Posted on 06/28/2024 12:08:45 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) distanced themselves from President Joe Biden Friday after a disastrous debate performance which spurred key Democrat elected officials and power brokers to question Biden’s ability to win in November.
The current and previous leaders, respectively, of House Democrats, Jeffries and Pelosi have raised and spent millions to strip the majority from Republicans in November – money and effort which could be wasted if Biden drags down the rest of the Democratic ticket and Donald Trump maintains his dominance in the polls.
Jeffries refused to comment on the debate Friday morning before darting into the safety of the House chamber.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
What a great great day! After 50 years of being a sociopathic liar, Biden said at his rally, “I know how to tell the truth.” Hey that’s a start in the road back.
That photo is either doctored, or I now need to see a doctor after looking. My eyes are scorched...
I told ya! LOL
Bela Lugosi’s twin sister
Who was it who said that if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog...
Yogi’s first catcher’s mitt.
Calling Jackson Brown.
“Jeffries and Pelosi have raised and spent millions to strip the majority from Republicans in November”
“The 10 Senate seats most likely to flip in 2024”
WV(Republican Jim Justice)
MT(Republican Tim Sheehy)
OH(Republican Bernie Moreno)
NV(Republican Sam Brown)
AZ(Republican Kari Lake)
PA(Republican Dave McCormick)
MI(August primary)
WI(Republican Eric Hovde)
MD(Republican Larry Hogan)
TX(Republican Ted Cruz)
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/05/politics/senate-race-rankings-april-2024/index.html
The National Democratic Congressional Committee
said these congressional districts were in play
as of early June 2024:
AZ-01 David Schweikert
AZ-06 primary July 30th
CA-03 Kevin Kiley
CA-13 John Duarte
CA-22 David G. Valadao
CA-27 Mike Garcia
CA-40 Young Kim
CA-41 Ken Calvert
CA-45 Michelle Steele
CA-47 Scoll Baugh
CO-03 primary June 25
FL-13 Anna Paulina Luna
FL-27 Maria Elvira Salazar (primary August 20)
IA-01 Mariannette Miller-Meeks
IA-03 Zach Nunn
MI-07 primary Aug 6th
MI-10 John James
MT-01 Ryan Zinke
NE-02 Don Bacon
NJ-07 Thomas Kean Jr.
NY-01
NY-03
NY-04
NY-17
NY-19
NY-22
OR-05
PA-01
PA-10
VA-02
WI-01
WI-03
Candidate Party
Total receipts Total disbursements Cash on hand
LAWLER, MICHAEL VINCENT REPUBLICAN PARTY
$4,179,635.87 $1,195,612.77 $3,022,484.75
JONES, MONDAIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
$3,904,490.00 $860,669.98 $3,115,165.39
just substitute for state and district:
https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/house/NY/17/2024/
National Republican Congressional Committee:
https://www.nrcc.org/
Biden's debate catastrophe viewed by 50,000 Americans.
Looks like a casket photo with the eyes open.
Doctored.
I think this was all a setup to get rid of Biden and get Newsom in. So, it is no surprise Nancy is publicly retreating from Biden.
The dems knew Biden would do a terrible job at the debate and they needed to convince everyone on their side he wasn’t fit to run again. Isn’t June kind of early for a Presidential debate? Something seemed fishy to me.
Everyone’s talking about the debate. Where is it?
Sometimes, when you ask the right questions, you don’t ask why people in assisted living facilities suddenly realize Joe Biden is more than a few french fries short of a Happy Meal, and instead you ask why Politico proactively had a journalist embedded in an assisted living facility to get feedback on Joe Biden.
Seriously. What did Politico know about the debate in advance, such that it was an assignment to have a top headline article prepped? I think we all know the answer to that question. Essentially, the entire professional political class in DC knows about an operation to replace Joe Biden. If you understand that is the plan, you adjust your corporate assignments accordingly. Politico did just that.
(Politico) – […] “How Biden’s devastating debate went over at an assisted living facility” – For Biden, it was a disaster. His allies had seen the debate as his best chance yet to ease concerns about his age, a persistent liability for his campaign. And the perception of older voters — who turn up to vote at higher levels any other age group — is critical to the Democratic president. He lost voters 65 and older to Donald Trump by 5 percentage points in 2020, but is courting them aggressively in the run-up to November.
Nothing his contemporaries saw here Thursday helped his case. “I think that he is rushing it, and he’s not looking at the camera for the most part,” said Meg Maguire, 81, who was visiting the facility to watch the debate with her husband. She said, “In terms of just physical relationship to the camera, Trump is doing better.”
[…] And by the first commercial break on Thursday — when at least three residents here had nodded off — the damage to Biden had been done.
“Let’s face it, a debate is a performance,” said Claire Moses, 83. And she offered a blunt assessment of the one that Biden was turning in.
“Biden is not a good performer,” Moses said. “And I’m very sad tonight because I think that Biden is a great president, and he is a great president because of what he has done, what he has accomplished, not how he speaks.” (read more)
She is doable.
Oh boy, and some were saying that since the Biden’s won’t take orders from Obama and Mooch hates them, only Pelosi might be able to talk Joe into quitting.
Go ahead follow these 2 idiots over the cliff
that’s really the picture from her attic...right ?
I am surprised that Pelosi and Jeffries are not claiming the debate was UNFAIR because Joe did not have a teleprompter to read the answers to any question posed to him.
After all, Pelosi and Jeffries have implied Joe has successfully been a world leader for 3 1/2 years by reading a teleprompter written by someone else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.