Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court possibly upends scores of Jan. 6 Capitol riot prosecutions, narrows obstruction charge
NY Post ^ | 06/28/2024 | Ryan King

Posted on 06/28/2024 8:29:34 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

In a move that could upend scores of Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot prosecutions, the Supreme Court on Friday narrowed the use of a charge of obstructing an official proceeding.

In a 6- 3 decision in which Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the conservative majority and Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the liberal dissenters, the high court concluded that prosecutors need to hang closer to the statutory langue of the obstruction charge used in a slew of Jan. 6 prosecutions.

“The Government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or as we earlier explained, other things used in the proceeding, or attempted to do so,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

At issue was a technical reading of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act which stipulates that anyone who “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so” faces criminal liability.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: capitol; capitolriot; j6; jan6; jan6th; obstruction; prosecutions; riot; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: frogjerk

“”high profile corporate accounting scandals at the time.””

Outdone by Enron, I would say. I am reading “Conspiracy of Fools”..has more or as many pages as “Atlas Shrugged” or “Unintended Consequences”. I may not live long enough to finish it. I was much younger when I read those two...

I do most of my reading in bed and this isn’t a book to read in bed - can barely lift it so it remains on my dining room table and I read while I eat.


21 posted on 06/28/2024 9:41:45 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

We get a whole slew of conservative opinions, including 5-4 decisions such as the overturning of Roe v. Wade (that’s kind of a big one), that would not have occurred without ACB being on the Court...yet we were “burned” by ACB?

Is Kentanji Brown Jackson now a conservative justice because of the way she ruled on this and a couple of other cases?


22 posted on 06/28/2024 1:09:03 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The DOJ and D.C. judges will twist the words of thise decision to keep prosecuting and imprisoning these patriots.


23 posted on 06/28/2024 1:31:53 PM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson