Warren: If Trump Wins Republicans ‘Are Coming After Abortion, Contraception and IVF’

Breitbart ^ | 06/23/2024 | Pam Key

[ChicagoConservative27]

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” that if former President Donald Trump wins the election, Republicans “are coming after abortion, contraception and IVF in every single state in this country.”

Warren said, “We need three things. We need access to abortion. We need access to contraception, and we need access to IVF. The Republicans have blocked all three. They have laid out their plan to say they’re not going to permit women to have those three, and have access to them. The Democrats are fully on board. If we have the trifecta, the House, the Senate, and the White House, then we are going to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again. With Joe Biden in the presidency rather than Donald Trump, we will have as much protection for women as humanly possible.”

[dforest]

The problem with democrats is they thought they could ruin the economy and make people poorer and sail to victory on abortion. Women don’t like poverty Liz.

It is the economy, stupid. All the bullshat “bidenomics is great” smells to the everyday American.

Can’t afford rent, food, insurance, gasoline, heating and cooling, and an occaisonal vaca for the middle class people.

We aren’t lovin’ it, Lizzie. Even the beer prices have increased.

Trump needs to keep mentioning how Biden has cut medicare advantage back too.

[blueunicorn6]

Another Democrat criminal yelling that the sky is falling so she can continue her criminal actions.

[HerrBlucher]

Kittens and bunnies too.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

It be soc sec too with gop strays prone to discuss cuts

They are already spreading the lie "Trump will cut social security" to seniors. How? Network media, social media, ads. AARP? Some seniors believe it.

[Gene Eric]

If Democrats win, they’ll kill your babies, cut off your sex organs, impregnate males, and have illegals rape and kill you.

Go take a bath, stinky.

[Jumper]

Trump should say Americans will have a choice with me:

The Needs of the Many Outweigh the Wants of the Few.

We will have a National Referendum on Abortions/Homosexual Conversions vs. Dental and Eye Care.

The funny thing is Americans have never been given a choice before.

[Reno89519]

Is Warren now identifying as a fertile woman?

[KC_Conspirator]

Yes, expect this to be ramped up in fall advertising to get the suburban woman forget about crime and inflation.

[The Free Engineer]

I don’t understand the notion that people who favor life would oppose IVF. Nor how people who favor killing the unborn for any reason care.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

12 Women Come Forward Alleging They were Sexually Assaulted by Whoever Trump's VP Pick Is

Should be "Whomever" but whatever.

[Aeneas2112]

I think as long as anyone is talking about trying to outlaw or prevent the distribution of Mifepristone like a couple of dolts it is going to seem plausible

[Z28.310]

More importantly, they’re coming after your 1/250th% of native American blood droplet. Be afraid! Very afraid! They’re sending mosquitos!

[whitney69]

“...to outlaw or prevent the distribution of Mifepristone...”

The two main used are mifepristone and misoprostol. But I think the main point is that terminating a pregnancy is now in the hands of the states and not the feds, as much as they would like it to be. And being closer to the people it places the decision at the right level no matter how it is made. There has become such a disconnect between the feds and the voters (people) that probably the less than can influence the decision the better it is.

wy69

[kiryandil]

LOL!

Honest Injun! :)

[Aeneas2112]

I am referring to the attempt of some medical professionals to make it illegal to distribute. SCOTUS slapped down one attempt.

[Scrambler Bob]

We need access to abortion. We need access to contraception, and we need access to IVF.
= = =

Aren’t these mutually exclusive?

Contraception rules out need for abortion

Abortion is counter to IVF

IVF is only needed if some one wants an abortion, and can’t get pregnant naturally.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Contraception rules out need for abortion

Even if contraception did not exist, that would not prove a "need" for abortion, unless the consequence of not aborting was death. Also, unless the method was abstinence, the pro-abortion faction would argue that some contraception methods are not totally effective.

Even abstinence can fail to prevent pregnancy in the case of rape. In that case, even red states have permitted abortions, and there is no law that is 100% agreed upon in that situation. And of course exceptions for rape can be abused by those who believe that lying about rape is justified. Sometimes the law produces unjust outcomes, in my opinion.

[Scrambler Bob]

Yes.

I was making a general logical comparison of these “Woman’s Needs”, and that Warren is contradicting herself with her short statement.

(Oh, and I don’t think she will be needing any of the three needs.)

And at a deeper level, you are right.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Thanks. It’s difficult to write simple statements on this subject because there are so many possibilities. Feminists, or whatever they call themselves now, think about the uncertainty and worst cases of every path.

[Svartalfiar]

I don’t understand the notion that people who favor life would oppose IVF.

Because it kills tons of kids. IVF itself isn't the problem, it's how it's conducted. Normally 10—30 eggs are initially harvested and fertilized, as not every egg will be good/viable, especially as women age. So at this point, you have moment of conception with 5-20 viable embryos. Normally 1, maybe 2 are implanted each month to see if they take. Once pregnancy happens, the remaining embryos (little kids) are normally destroyed. That is why most pro-life proponents are against IVF. Some may be donated as 'embryo adoption' for other couples' IVFs, or kept in the freezer (questionable on appropriateness here, keeping the kid frozen hoping to be implanted eventually), but the majority are simply discarded. So basically the same as Plan B or early-term abortion for the majority of the embryos created.

If this process was one egg at a time the whole cycle through, most pro-lifers would be perfectly fine with it. But from a time- and money- cost basis, that is terribly ineffective.