Posted on 06/21/2024 6:30:15 AM PDT by CFW
The Supreme Court will release Opinions this morning at 10:00 a.m. Attorneys at scotusblog will be in the press room and live-blogging the Opinions as they are received.
There were four opinions released yesterday which leaves 19 cases remaining for this term. Yesterday's thread on those opinions is here:
For those keeping score, thus far Roberts has written 2 opinions; Thomas 7, Alito, 4, Kagan 5, Gorsuch 2, Kavanaugh 5, Sotomayor, 7, Barrett 3, and Jackson 4. (three cases were per curiam)
Cases of interest and great importance that remain undecided are the Trump immunity case (Trump v. U.S.), the Fischer case (relating to Jan 6 and Trump), and the two cases relating to the Chevron deference issues, Loper Bright and Relentless.
There is also a 2nd Amendment case, Rahimi, regarding possession of a firearm by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders.
And of course, there are the First Amendment case. First is NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, then Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and finally Missouri v. Murthy Issues: Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.
A list of the cases for this term can be found at October 23 term
Happy SCOTUS Opinion day. Say a prayer for the Justices.
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...
I sure wish you the best in succeeding with your quest for a visa.
I’ve read it is pretty hot in Thailand. But I imagine you’ve already experienced it.
Blessings to you and your fiancee.
“Ooh. Does this mean that IOmar will not be able to get a visa for marrying her brother?”
—
Wouldn’t it be nice if someone had even questioned her on the issue? Now that is a case I’d like to see before the courts.
Please add me to your ping list. Thanks in advance.
And thanks in the present for this thread today.
They ultimately revert to their emotions, although they will deny this.
Please add me to your ping list. Thanks in advance.
And thanks in the present for this thread today.
I’ve added you to the ping list.
By the way, for those interested in the 2nd amendment case, there will be a write-up on it at scotusblog later this afternoon. Those attorneys lean left but they are good at legal writing so it’s worth your time to check in for updated articles occasionally.
When Gorsuch screws up, he does it BIG.
Bostock was a horrific decision, which HE authored. It put a HUGE bludgeon in the hands of the Gaystapo. We're only beginning to see the downstream outworking of this travesty.
Notice anything interesting about our “laws” and “courts” these days?
“The Second Amendment does not exist in my courtroom”.
“You must find him guilty of something... Here’s a multiple choice list...”
Etc...
👍🏼 👍🏼 ❤️
Exactly, thanks for your feedback and for this thread!
Probably won’t change until Roberts retires as he’s not providing much leadership. The Supreme Court needs to reign this in, not ignore and facilitate it.
Please add me to your ping list, too. Thanks in advance!
They literally just codified it. It’ll be decades to correct.
Done!
—
In other court news:
Some mildly good news for Steve Bannon. Bannon filed an emergency appeal to SCOTUS regarding his sentence.
Chief Justice Roberts has ordered the Biden DOJ to respond to the emergency stay application to keep him out of jail by 4 pm this coming Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 4 pm.
At that point, Steve’s clock will have ticked down to 4 days left before his prison report date of 7/1/24.
The House must file an amicus brief in support of June 26. The evening of June 26 is when the Supreme Court (or Chief Justice Roberts acting on his own) will start considering the stay application.
The House must be on file before the Supreme Court starts that process for its views to be heard
How far does this extend since elsewhere someone charged with a crime and in court doesn't lose their rights if I recall correctly?
Bit by bit the entire wall will be worn away by well meaning courts.
Wonder if they’re going to save all of the other decisions until after the debate, or drop them before in order to burn up the news cycle during the debate?
Thanks!
Problem being that these orders can and are issued as just a complaint about someone with no proof or legal process, just a one side request to the court. Can be as simple as a complaint via a phone call that the receiver felt threatened by the conversation or verbal threat. The actual hearing where the accused actually is able to defend themselves or dissent can be weeks later depending on court availability, but firearms are surrendered immediately.
I must have said a thousand times that Nicole Brown Simpson should have gotten a gun and learned how to use it.
And she should have gotten a restraining order.
Short sighted. What was established here is the a simple bench ruling trumps your rights.
The specifics will not matter. This is how a tax on full auto guns turned into bump stock bans.
The precedent is now set and codified. It WILL be misused. If you need convincing that it won’t, you failed History 101.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.