What is blatant is that the Dems are practicing lawfare against Trump and for SCOTUS to say that acknowledges there is not equal justice for all.
Aaaaahhhh yes, the voice of reason and civil political discourse that is MSNBC.
Snicker... We are beset upon all sides by clowns.
Some guy on Twitter says for the only second time, Roberts is erecting fencing around the Court building. The first time was after the Roe leak occurred. Thursday morning a ruling(s) will be announced.
Trump deserves due process. These liberal a$$holes wanted an expedited trial in a kangaroo court.
So MSNBC says that if the Court had just ignored all law and legal precedent from the beginning they could now have Trump convicted on federal charges. How dare SCOTUS not get with the program!?
“...Justice Department tradition....”
Someone remind me of the Justice Department’s tradition in trying to remove immunity from a President. I know Merrick Garland has indicated he has immunity from Congressional oversight but no one has mentioned the “tradition” our nation has in a situation where a Presidential administration is charging the previous Presidential with a crime in such a manner.
How was this handled in previous instances? Or “traditionally” so to speak?
Answer: It’s never happened. And MSNBC think that SCOTUS should just wave it on through without a word under the concept of the “Trump exception” to all laws and precedent.
Dennis Aftergut? Sounds like a fictional character from Charles Dickens.
I’m sure Roberts, being the woosie he is, hates Trump’s guts and will try to throw him to the wolves if he can.
ORANGE MAN BAD.........
“OH Nos, he is gaining in the polls, assassination is our sole option.” SICKOS!
THese bastids have wound themselves up so tightly, they are like head hunters beating the war drums for a volcano sacrifice.
What idiocy.
Yeah, as if depraved Jack Smith respects political or legal norms.
Hey Roberts....you have some VERY WISE Judges and some VERY STUPID, EVIL Judges!!
“radical conservative”... no bias here
“[R]adical conservative majority”? This kind of rhetoric is a threat to democracy.
The Democrats decided to call what, on Trump’s watch, was a 4 hour riot an insurrection for political purposes and to get around the Presidential immunity issue that all Presidents have in dealing with situations that arise as part of their duties when they are President. The media, of course, cooperated and only referred to it as an insurrection. The conservatives on Supreme Court do not read the newspapers and know a riot when they see one. Thus, immunity is certainly an issue
deceit & conceit both.
The only radicals on the supreme court are the 3 communists.
MSNBC, the voice of temperate legal foundations.