Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leave your cans out, park your truck: DeSantis signs bill to rein in overbearing HOA fines
The Daytona Beach News-Journal ^ | June 3, 2024 | C.A. Bridges

Posted on 06/05/2024 12:09:23 PM PDT by chickenlips

Florida residents with oppressive and obsessive HOAs, your day of freedom may be at hand.

Homeowner associations (HOAs) were created to maintain standards, uniformity and a sense of community while collecting dues to pay for common areas, services and general neighborhood improvements. But they also tend to attract people with strong opinions about what their neighbors can do.

It seems that everyone who has lived in an HOA has a horror story about petty or arbitrary fines that keep increasing, harassment, inflexible and overly restrictive rules regarding the appearance of homes and lawns, the lack of budget transparency, or just the ongoing grind of living under the watchful eyes of HOA busybodies with tape measures and a lot of free time who care deeply about where you park.

A new bill, signed Friday by Gov, Ron DeSantis, may change all that when it takes effect July 1. Or at least make life a little more manageable.

HB 1203, Homeowners' Association, was just one of several HOA bills introduced in this year's legislative session but it may be the most sweeping one, amounting to essentially a Homeowner's Bill of Rights. Under state law, HOAs will be restricted from some of the most complained-about rules and fines and required to be more transparent. This law comes just after another one forcing HOAs to allow homeowners to harden their homes against hurricanes.

Here's what changed.

(Excerpt) Read more at news-journalonline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: desantis; florida; hoas; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: ConservativeWarrior

“kitty-corner”

I always used catty-corner but see it is now a close second.

Catty is closer to the middle English catre.


21 posted on 06/05/2024 12:48:14 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: refreshed

“It seems to me that people that live in HOAs bind themselves to their own hurt. I really don’t want another layer of government.”

Interesting that people willingly pay more to live in HOA communities ...


22 posted on 06/05/2024 12:50:17 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Well in the case of denying the installation of storm shutters for hurricane protection, it’s because they were doing stupid shit against community safety and public policy, which often makes a contract unenforceable anyway.

This is just a way to keep HOA cases from clogging up the courts.


23 posted on 06/05/2024 12:52:22 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

Lived in two subdivisions with HOAs. Never had a single problem and really had no contact with them except for notices of HOA meetings, and the yearly bills, which were $500/yr in one (swimming pool and tennis courts) and $150/year in another (grass trimmed at the entrance, and some street signs put up).


24 posted on 06/05/2024 1:00:00 PM PDT by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

I would like a law that required EVERY bylaw or rule on an HOA, of any kind, to be approved not just by a majority of residents in the HOA who vote on a measure, but by an absolute majority of all the residents in the HOA, and upon initiation of the law, to require those approvals on all the existing bylaws and rules when the law is adopted.

And further, than any 10% or more of HOA residents who later petition to have am existing bylaw or rule put up for a vote, MUST be granted an HOA wide vote in which an absolute majority of HOA residents must vote to keep the bylaw or rule, or it is rescinded and a 2nd vote must be held to consider a replacement bylaw or rule, again which must obtain a majority of HOA residents to put the new bylaw or rule in place.

THAT should clean out much the HOA leeway that allows for ruling cliques and petty dictators.

I believe in real democracy, not controlling cliques and petty dictators, even in an HOA.


25 posted on 06/05/2024 1:03:34 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

I won’t be told what to do. Couldn’t live in those hellholes.


26 posted on 06/05/2024 1:04:05 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

UNLESS AND UNTIL you have suffered financially, mentally, physically and Spiritually at the hands of HOA dictators, you should just shu’up! say...YOU aren’t one of “Them”....right?


27 posted on 06/05/2024 1:05:48 PM PDT by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips
Homeowner associations (HOAs) were created to maintain standards, uniformity and a sense of community while collecting dues to pay for common areas, services and general neighborhood improvements.

Don’t kid yourself. HOAs were created as a tool to deal with desegregation. It’s really that simple.

28 posted on 06/05/2024 1:07:18 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Nobody is forced to live in an HOA community. If you don’t like them then don’t live in one.


29 posted on 06/05/2024 1:09:40 PM PDT by bankwalker (Repeal the 19th ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

HOA’s just blow. No thanks.


30 posted on 06/05/2024 1:13:07 PM PDT by ronniesgal (have you even tried to mind your own business?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

That is mostly true. But there are cities/communities within Florida who pattern their governance after HOAs.

You get what you bought into with an HOA or Condo Assn, without question.

But this is a shot across the bow for many municipalities within the State, to be sure.


31 posted on 06/05/2024 1:18:02 PM PDT by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior

Knowingly harboring dangerous animals on HOA common grounds. Could cost the board and the neighborhood millions in a negligence suit. Oh, and how about the potential for conspiracy to murder of a child under the.depraved indifference theory.


32 posted on 06/05/2024 1:20:59 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

Not quite the option you think it is, actually since many counties, states and municipalities have forced all development to be done planned community development to move the cost of city services for new citizens from the city to the developer and his clients.


33 posted on 06/05/2024 1:22:52 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I live in a benign HOA whose only purpose is to maintain the storm water detention basins, maintain the trail through the adjacent woods, and pay the property taxes on those common areas. They also have a set of basic rules that just prevent you from letting your home look like the suburban ghetto subdivision on the other side of town.

The HOA fees are less than $100 — a YEAR.

Homes in this subdivision are selling for at least 30% more than the ones on the other side of town where real estate listings include prominent bragging that there’s “No HOA!” there.

34 posted on 06/05/2024 1:28:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (“Ain't it funny how the night moves … when you just don't seem to have as much to lose.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior

He was one of my favorites as well. Why my stepfather was dying, I read That’s books to him. It seemed to help with the pain he was experiencing prior to his death


35 posted on 06/05/2024 1:29:44 PM PDT by Glennb51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

Good. Somebody is finally challenging the Karens.


36 posted on 06/05/2024 1:34:48 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking
You have no idea what I have been through with HOAs and condo associations in the past. LOL.

In the last two cases that I worked on, the HOA had two different attorneys over the course of five years. By the time the second case ended, both attorneys representing the HOA were out of business and one of them ended up paying a settlement to my client — the DEFENDANT.

37 posted on 06/05/2024 1:35:20 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (“Ain't it funny how the night moves … when you just don't seem to have as much to lose.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

“I believe in real democracy, not controlling cliques and petty dictators, even in an HOA.”

**************

Not defending HOA hegemony, but voting on issues can become problematic as most residents seems uninterested in participating in any decisions in my experience. Its often hard to get quorums for meetings.


38 posted on 06/05/2024 1:37:54 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001
Vague language and tie-ins to covenant language that wouldn't be legally valid.

My HOA said I had to do a bunch of stuff never before expected, based on the contracted “keep the property up.”

The property looked good and professionally done, but changing out to stuff no one else had and this property never had, was about a desire for what the president wanted everyone home to have.

It would be like saying all home owners suddenly had to have EVs and a charger on the front part of the driveway, under the same “keep the property up” clause.

That same board had just funneled many hundreds of thousands of dollars (from new HOA loans) to friends to redo perfectly fine entrances no one had ever complained about. He and his flunkies were voted out, next election.

39 posted on 06/05/2024 1:40:36 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

It seems ludicrous to have to have a law to stop arbitrary abuse, but it’s valid.


40 posted on 06/05/2024 1:42:06 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson