Posted on 05/30/2024 1:41:36 PM PDT by DCBryan1
Verdict in.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I just checked this using Brave AI.
"In New York, felons can vote as long as they are not incarcerated." However, Trump is a resident of Florida and votes there, not in New York.
According to Brave AI, "According to the Florida Department of State, a felony conviction in another state makes a person ineligible to vote in Florida only if the conviction would make the person ineligible to vote in the state where the person was convicted."
This would appear to mean that Trump can still vote in November regardless, unless Merchan goes so far as to incarcerate Trump. THAT act would take us to a completely different level of engagement -- DEFCON 1.
-PJ
“I’m praying in the coming days, the names of each and every one of these jurors is leaked and they’re doxxed“
He here isn’t the slightest doubt in my mind that if the polarity were reversed the names and pics would be out by now.
I would have expected some of the jurors to have been on TV to bask in applause by now...maybe they realize that a lot of the public knows what a farce the trial was.
Thanks, interesting. I had just gone by what someone on Fox had said.
None of the Carroll jurors have done so. I expect that these ones are going to want to keep[ a low profile.
“Judge Jeanine said it can’t go straight to the SCOTUS because that isn’t procedure.”
Stay of the Florida recount
See also: Supreme Court of Florida § 2000 presidential election
Florida Supreme Court
By December 8, 2000, there had been multiple court decisions about the presidential election in Florida.[16] On that date, the Florida Supreme Court, by a 4–3 vote, ordered a statewide manual recount of undervotes.[17] On December 9, ruling in response to an emergency request from Bush, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the recount.
wiki
They say they are just as 'woke' (if not more) than Harvard, Berkley or any other institution!
He sure sucks at it
I would love to see the SCOTUS step in. But the talking heads say that the present case is a state court action. The other, in Florida, involved a federal situation because it was considered national.
“I would love to see the SCOTUS step in. But the talking heads say that the present case is a state court action. The other, in Florida, involved a federal situation because it was considered national.”
Florida was a state court case. It does not have to be a “national” issue to submit an application for emergency appeal to the federal courts.
Ideally there would be a negotiated settlement on all this, like Brexit. Which won't be painless. Texas will have to assume some portion of the US Debt. (I would say perhaps exclude the debt accrused under Biden seeing as our objections to the stolen election were not attended to by the Feds, we shouldn't take the debt of the fake Biden Occupation government.
You need to grow a pair.
What funds? SS? After seperation the people of Texas will pay THE SAME AMOUNT OF TAXES except tp the country of Texas. Get it? Why is that so hard for many to understand?
Gotta wonder about the $850,000 Bill Clinton payoff to Paula Jones, November 1998.
Campaign hush? Line ledger classified?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.