Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Barr Elected NRA President, Reform Slate Sweeps Other Offices
Bearing Arms ^ | 5/20/24 | Cam Edwards

Posted on 05/20/2024 3:18:31 PM PDT by CFW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: CFW; Bob Barr

Wasn’t this ex- congresscritter from GA a member here on FR a while back? Maybe still is?


41 posted on 05/20/2024 8:08:03 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Tagline outlawed by Obama, the Outlaw in Chief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Wasn’t that Sen. Frank Lautenberg. D-NJ?


42 posted on 05/20/2024 8:36:30 PM PDT by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Lotta Cretaceous Aged folks here on FR too. :)


43 posted on 05/20/2024 9:05:20 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: gundog

Kinda, kinda not.

Lautenberg did the original full and retroactive ban. Barr changed it to only apply to people convicted of misdemeanors from 97 on. We held the house then. Dole and Trent Lott ran the Senate in that era.

“Representative Barr’s amendment could arm thousands of convicted abusers by narrowing the law so that it applies only to those batterers and child abusers convicted after the date of the law’s passage: September 30, 1996. Under the Barr measure, any wife beater or child abuser convicted prior to that date�and who is now forbidden to purchase or possess a firearm could once again legally own or buy a gun.”


44 posted on 05/20/2024 11:49:27 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
I remember that there were a considerable number of law enforcement officers that were prohibited from owning firearms after the amendment. Apart from the clearly un-Constitutional ex post facto nature of the law, I wonder how much that played into Barr’s decision.
45 posted on 05/21/2024 3:01:34 AM PDT by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Maybe, but my impression is that the ACLU is about as ‘reformable’ as the NAACP.


46 posted on 05/21/2024 12:34:06 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson