Posted on 05/17/2024 4:42:14 AM PDT by SJackson
During the last few years, while the American left and its media minions have been presenting clueless consumers with a narrative that’s well-nigh unprecedented in the degree to which it deviates from the truth, David Horowitz, in a series of model books, has been busy setting the record straight. Was Donald Trump’s presidency an exercise in authoritarianism and a threat to our democracy? No, it was an attempt – foiled by his enemies in the deep state – to return the country to its constitutional roots. Was George Floyd a martyr in a nation founded on white supremacism? No, he was a thug who’s been deified by race hustlers out to divide Americans along racial lines. Are corporate DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs a necessary measure to redress longtime prejudices and inequities? No, they’re part of a cynical Maoist attempt to compel universal acceptance of an ideology that’s utterly at odds with core American values.
I’ve compared these short volumes – which form a distinctive sequence in Horowitz’s large, storied, and wide-ranging oeuvre – to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and other pamphlets which, in the lead-up to the Declaration of Independence, played a crucial role in setting before the American public the argument for breaking from Britain. Now, in America Betrayed, Horowitz steps back from the present historical moment and from the left’s current menu of mischievous machinations in order to elucidate the origins and essence of the American project – and the long history of malevolent efforts to derail it. Those efforts, as it happens, have repeatedly centered on race, hence Horowitz’s declaration, in his preface, that he “wrote this book to provide a concise, easily digested and accurate history of race in America to serve as an antidote to the hateful lies progressives have promoted about their own country.”
To achieve this end, Horowitz first takes us back to the Protestant Reformation. His subtitle is How a Christian Monk Created America & Why the Left Is Determined to Destroy Her; the monk in question is none other than Martin Luther, whom, despite the fierce antisemitism of Luther’s later years, he has come to admire as a key figure in the back story of America’s founding. I should mention that fans of Horowitz who are also devout Catholics may find this part of the book problematic; but he’s quite simply correct when he describes the Roman Catholic Church of Luther’s time as a deeply corrupt authoritarian institution that, with no biblical warrant, and in defiance of the plain fact that all human beings (even priests, pontiffs, and prophets) are capable of evil, had “elevated the priesthood and the Church to superhuman heights.”
Among other things, the Catholic clergy, in their arrogance, claimed to possess the power to sell salvation itself in the form of “indulgences” – a practice that Horowitz rightly condemns as an “unholy scam.” Taking on this nasty business, Luther “brought the Church to its knees” – an accomplishment that Horowitz compares to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s role in bringing down the Soviet Union – and, translating the Bible into German so that his followers could read the Word of God for themselves, accustomed them to the notions of freedom of conscience, the sanctity of the individual soul, and “the priesthood of all believers.” As Horowitz explains, the United States of America could never have been established – at least in the form that we know it – without a basis in these principles of Luther’s, which by the mid-18th century had come to be embraced by most Christians in northern Europe. To quote from America Betrayed: “The sanctity of the human soul: this is the foundation of all democracy and the nemesis of human tyranny.”
Of course, a generation of young Americans are now being taught – thanks in large part to more recent unholy scams like the New York Times’ mendacious 1619 Project – that their country was, uniquely, built not on the sanctity of the individual but on the evil of slavery, and that the enslavement of Africans was, from the outset, justified by its defenders entirely on the basis of racial superiority. Horowitz shoots down these falsehoods with bullets of truth. For example:
No, far from being rooted in America’s founding principles, black slavery was, from the beginning, an affront to them. Most of America’s founders recognized this, and knew that one day the slavery question would have to be decided once and for all, probably on the field of battle. Given the number of soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice to end slavery, the 1619 Project’s lies are, as Horowitz puts it, “as malicious as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”
To be sure, as in any society where multiple ethnic groups have lived side by side, there have always been ethnic frictions in the U.S. And yes, there has been terrible racism. But it wasn’t as prevalent in the colonial era as it was in the antebellum Republic – especially in the Southern states – in the decades leading up to the Civil War, where defenders of the “peculiar institution,” living in a country founded on freedom and equality, had no argument for their position other than that those principles didn’t apply to black slaves. And why? Because, they maintained, those slaves, by virtue of their race, were by definition unequal, and thus unentitled to freedom. Needless to say, they had a weak case – and an un-American one. What was “distinctly American,” in other words, in the prewar arguments over slavery “was the declaration of equality embraced by the American majority, not the racist defense of slavery by the soon-to-be-defeated slaveholding majority.” Alas, the notion that blacks were naturally subordinate to whites persevered in the South for a century following the Civil War, providing a justification for Jim Crow and, during the presidency of the Virginia-born Woodrow Wilson, for the introduction of Dixie-style racial segregation into the federal government – a policy that was not reversed until World War II.
If the civil-rights movement of the mid-20th century won so much support – and accomplished so much reform so quickly – it was, affirms Horowitz, because the message of freedom and equality preached by the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., was consistent with, and indeed firmly rooted in, America’s founding values – and, in turn, in the teachings of Martin Luther. One wonderful detail that Horowitz mentions here came as news to me: King’s father, who, like him, was a Baptist minister, was actually born Michael King, but, after he learned at a conference in Germany about the life and teachings of Martin Luther, he changed his name to Martin Luther King.
Thanks to Dr. King’s approach, the transformation of race relations in America during the second half of the 20th century was nothing short of miraculous. Dr. King had called for America to “live out the full meaning of its creed” – and it did. Yet in the 1960s and afterwards, even as racial prejudice was steadily diminishing on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line, race hustlers were stepping up their efforts to sow division. Jews had played an outsized role in the civil-rights movement, but hatemongers like Stokely Carmichael (aka Kwame Ture) and Louis Farrakhan depicted Jews as devils. And in the 21st century, the Democratic Party, which had been the home of the KKK, reaffirmed its role as the “party of racial divisions” (Horowitz’s apt phrase) by embracing the tribalist – and explicitly Marxist – movement known as Black Lives Matter.
It goes without saying that Barack Obama would never have been elected (and re-elected) president if America had not overcome the blight of racism. But once ensconced in the Oval Office, he spoke of racism as America’s founding sin and of black slavery as if it had been a uniquely American evil. No surprise there: Obama was a devout disciple of the pernicious political theorist Saul Alinsky, who in books like Rules for Radicals preached that mankind is divided into oppressors and oppressed, and that the radical’s job is to drag down the former and empower the latter. During Obama’s presidency, the toxic notion of America as a “white supremacist” nation in which the oppressors had always been white and the oppressed always black became nothing less than establishment orthodoxy. So it is that those of us who reject this premise are now faced with the daunting task of somehow returning America to its senses, to its values – to itself.
By turns infuriating and inspiring, America Betrayed is a masterpiece of concision, tracing the American idea – the real American idea – from its Protestant roots to the present day with remarkable precision and clarity. Horowitz’s preface alone is full of sentences that should be carved in stone somewhere:
It’s fascinating, moreover, to learn about what the author refers to as his own youthful “flirtations” with Christianity. A lifelong secular Jew, Horowitz was nonetheless, for a time, a “Christian romantic.” During his second year of college, he was permitted to deliver a sermon at a Lutheran church in which he discussed Oscar Wilde’s short story “The Happy Prince,” which, in Horowitz’s view, “captured the Christian message.” Horowitz calls Wilde’s story “poignant,” and I found this anecdote itself quite poignant, because it captures something of what makes Horowitz stand out from all other conservative intellectuals of his generation. Which of them, after all, can you imagine as a 1950s college kid, preaching from a Lutheran pulpit about a story by Oscar Wilde, of all people? This passage, along with a handful of other autobiographical references, imbue America Betrayed with an affecting personal touch that makes it seem at times less similar to one of his potent political jeremiads of recent vintage and more reminiscent of his pithy meditative volumes with titles like A Point in Time. It is, in any event, a gem of a book, and should be read by everyone who’s been swayed by the left’s loathsome lies about race in America.
Related threads
'October 7' play opens in NYC, telling victims stories through verbatim accounts
Police kill armed man trying to set fire to synagogue in France, says minister
Current fighting in Jabaliya is among the war’s ‘most violent,’ says IDF
Protestants will never understand how this sentence makes Catholic eyes roll: “Among other things, the Catholic clergy, in their arrogance, claimed to possess the power to sell salvation itself in the form of “indulgences” – a practice that Horowitz rightly condemns as an “unholy scam.””
Selling indulgences had already been strictly, absolutely, unequivocally, universally condemned by the Catholic Church. I don’t mean to whitewash the Church — I think what really set Luther off was predatory homosexuality which likely existed in his seminary. Anyone who thinks this is a new problem should know that the majority of people sentenced to death by the Spanish Inquisition were sentenced for homosexual abuse within the clergy.
What I can’t stand is the deification of one of the world’s most evil men of all time, Martin Luther. He was the very mouthpiece of Satan, who yes, does use sin to separate us from God and each other. Luther’s insistence that the efficacy of a sacrament depends on the sanctity of the clergy is without a doubt the greatest profanation since the Crucifixion itself.
Luther’s inspiration to the Nazis isn’t just some late-in-life faux pas; he was absolutely, wickedly, insanely bent AGAINST the notion that all men are created equal, and
believed the elites should see the commoner as wretches who DESERVE to die as cannon-fodder, whether Catholic or Reformed.
Even in Hitler’s or Stalin’s writings, you get the sense that the commoner is some pathetic victim whose passing is a sacrifice to a greater cause, but Luther saw the suffering and death of the millions of soldiers whose suffering he caused as a deserved fate and whose deaths he caused as an improvement.
Nor There is any reason for any serious historian to expect any sincerity in Luther’s writings. When the Muslims threat was distant, he deadened princes’ consciences with claims that it was God Himself who ordained the Muslims to kill and torture their Catholic victims; Don’t waste your fortunes, he told the princes, but enjoy your whores instead! But when Muslims encroached on Germany, then he decided that Mohammed was a demon. Such was the scandal that to this day, this is why any land threatened by Mohammed, including the South of Germany, is Catholic whereas Protestantism is found only in the areas remote from Islam’s threat, places like Scandinavia, Britain, the North of Germany, the lowlands. The Princes would neither forgive, nor forget the treachery.
“Among other things, the Catholic clergy, in their arrogance, claimed to possess the power to sell salvation itself in the form of “indulgences” – a practice that Horowitz rightly condemns as an “unholy scam.””
Indulgences - at least those actually authorized by the Church - did not, nor could not, “sell salvation”.
I really wish people who would write about these things would research them first rather than believing the created myths.
"Now go forth, and vanquish the commies." pic.twitter.com/MO0Rs67fci— Haikus From Underground (@HaikusFromUnder) May 17, 2024
Probably could have found a better example. I'd take issue with the word created in the headline as well. Neither of which negates the thrust of the article which is the left's attempt of the destruction of American culture and character.
I want to know more about this, I have always kind of suspected exactly what you are saying.
BTTT
ping
Re” “Slavery still exists today – not in any majority-white country”
It exists here in the U.S.A., too. It is illegal but it exists. Slavery in our nation is crossing our southern border every day.
My husband and I recently took a one-week road trip through 3 states. At every rest stop, there were posters where slaves ( the abducted) could call for help.
puhleeze.... do you ever wonder how the Kennedys have had all their marriages "annulled" hahahahahaha... or how the pederasts and manipulators have tried to destroy the Roman Catholic Church....
We have a communist homosexual as a pope and everything is just peachy in Rome.
I am a Catholic and would not mind if Rome was visited by the Visigoths again. I believe it's called "creative destruction".
The Vatican has more land and wealth than most countries but still shills for cash and is used by communists as a front to manipulate governments.
Bttt.
5.56mm
I’ve heard that the Catholic Church inherited the Roman Empire. England is an exception which wouldn’t have flipped if Henry VIII had a healthy son early on.
I suppose Poland is an exception too? The lecture I heard didn’t explain that one.
Suggested reading: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1902/medieval-indulgence--martin-luther/
Looking back to the institution of Roman catholicism by Emperors Constantine and successors (emperors and kings of European & Mideast natinns) os the organ of state religion, i see that murderous domination of Western culture as simply a state-run form of religious slavery supported by the feudal systen from which the Founders of the United States of America freed us.
review
Luther was the 16th Century equivalent of the alt-right types of our time like Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, who see a highly corrupt institution, in their case the U.S. government and cultural institutions, and see Russia and even China as being the scourge of God sent providentially to defeat that institution. You even have traditional Catholics like E. Michael Jones, who sees Protestantism as satanic, and Nick Fuentes supporting the Russia-China-Iran axis.
Good article
Thanks for posting
“ Indulgences - at least those actually authorized by the Church - did not, nor could not, “sell salvation”.
That’s right. Of course they couldn’t.
“ really wish people who would write about these things would research them first rather than believing the created myths.”
Did you read it? It said claimed.
“claimed to possess the power to sell salvation”
When the Catholic Church inherited Rome, Rome was mostly pagan. In order to bring pagans into the church the Vatican adopted many pagan practices and beliefs. Such as goddess worship and idol worship.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.