Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/15/2024 6:35:10 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

I think judge Jeanine Piro nailed it.....it’s all going to come down to jury instructions from the judge.....and we all know what that means.


2 posted on 05/15/2024 6:37:41 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Turley said yesterday evening ,he believes Cohen committed perjury when he said he taped Trump without his knowledge to protect Trump.

If he was protecting Trump why didn't he tell Trump he was taping the conversation. Doesn't make any sense.

3 posted on 05/15/2024 6:43:08 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I haven’t been following the nitty gritty details, but how does lying about business records cover up a conspiracy in the election? Now I understand when they ask the question “what is the crime?”


4 posted on 05/15/2024 6:43:51 AM PDT by GMThrust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The prosecutor laid out the case, now the witnesses would have to provide the evidence to back up these claims. However, witness after witness seemed to undercut the central components of the case: that Trump had knowledge of the payments, that he was the orchestrator, and that he was motivated by manipulating the 2016 election to win.

Let us assume for the sake of argument that all of what these things were absolutely true (although its doubtful they are):

Trump still was not guilty of even second degree falsification of books. The payments to Cohen were indeed legal expenses and thus the entries were factually true. Nor was anybody defrauded by the entries, since the election was over when the entries were made.

Should one care to argue he should have entered as "reimbursing black mail payment" as being more precise than "legal fees" then by that absurd standard Alvin Bragg's charges are breaking the same law since they do not reveal his motivation to interfere in the current election.

7 posted on 05/15/2024 6:53:17 AM PDT by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If the members of the jury decide to “believe” the charges are true, then he can be convicted without any evidence. I only served on one jury and I and one other man prevented that verdict. He was an elderly black man who kept repeating, “But there was no evidence.” I stopped the others from bullying him. We ended with a mistrial, hopelessly deadlocked.


9 posted on 05/15/2024 7:07:32 AM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

It’s obvious Cohen was paying off Stormy for his own sex with her. Why else would he hide the home loan from his wife?


11 posted on 05/15/2024 7:16:07 AM PDT by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races you do not like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Enough with the legal stuff, just let us find him guilty already.

- The Jury


14 posted on 05/15/2024 7:21:56 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Trump should have demanded a televised trial.

Judge and prosecutor would have said no, which would have given Trump a perfect opening to accuse them of personal cowardice and political motivation.

I like the image of Trump refusing to show up if the trial was not televised, and the judge and prosecutor threatening to have Trump dragged into the court room by marshals.

The fact that Conservative Americans must depend on the politically corrupt MSM to disseminate trial news is politically insane.

22 posted on 05/15/2024 8:08:39 AM PDT by zeestephen (Trump "Lost" By 43,000 Votes - Spread Across Three States - GA, WI, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Like the glove too small to fit OJ Simpson

The glove was not too small to fit O.J.’s hand. They had him wearing rubber gloves. He then tried, with exaggerated and comic awkwardness, to put the leather gloves on over top.

Go get a pair of leather gloves that fit you, and then try putting them on while wearing rubber gloves, and see how much they don't “fit”. The whole O.J. trial was a joke.

29 posted on 05/15/2024 8:51:16 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

watching the local Miami Florida tv “news”, one would think the prosecution and Stormy and Cohen have proven their case 10,000 times over.

Barely a mention of the defense poking holes everywhere.


30 posted on 05/15/2024 8:54:41 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

BTTT


32 posted on 05/15/2024 9:16:20 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

They don’t really care if they get a conviction or not, they just want to make Trump look bad to women voters and keep him from campaigning.


43 posted on 05/15/2024 2:51:39 PM PDT by Smittie (Just like an alien I'm a stranger in a strange land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
...efforts to "catch and kill"...

Is that anything like a bimbo eruption?

45 posted on 05/15/2024 3:17:17 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson