‘NO Climate Crisis’ Says Coalition of 1,600 Actual Scientists

californiaglobe.com ^ | 05.13.2024 | Katy Grimes

[rxsid]

‘NO Climate Crisis’ Says Coalition of 1,600 Actual Scientists
The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is ‘one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation’

“There is ‘NO Climate Crisis’ says a coalition of 1,600 actual scientists” in a recent letter to the California Air Resources Board. In fact, the scientists find that “California is in no danger of unusual drought: The annual precipitation in California has fluctuated greatly over the last 150 years, with only a slight decrease.”

California also has record low levels of air pollution that are below the threshold of human health effects, James E. Enstrom, PhD, MPH has told us repeatedly for years. He’s also one of the 1,600 scientists signed onto the letter to CARB.

The scientists also insisted that carbon dioxide is beneficial to Earth.

The CO2 Coalition’s letter is particularly timely with Gov. Gavin Newsom taking his climate change road show to the Vatican later this week where he was invited to speak by Pope Francis at a Summit of mayors and governors. The Summit, which will be held from May 15th to May 17th, will cover “the impact of rising temperatures” in local communities, and “climate resilience.”

This one-page summary letter begins with a link to a 16-page detailed report containing the strong evidence.

****************

An open letter to the California Air Resources Board

Dear Sir or Madam:

Good news: There is NO climate crisis in California. This claim was verified by the scientific data that were compiled by the CO₂ Coalition, a nonprofit organization with the goal of determining and propagating the facts regarding carbon dioxide (CO₂) and the climate (CO₂ Coalition, 2024). The key findings provided below stand in contrast to the climate crisis claims made in the March 1, 2024, California Priority Climate Action Plan (Priority Climate Action Plan, 2024) and the California Climate Disclosure Rules (Senate Bills No. 253 and No. 261) (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, 2024). More details can be found in the attached letter and appendix.

• Modest warming of California is beneficial and not a cause for concern: Globally, more people have died from the cold than from the heat since 2000.
• Increase in agricultural production: The combination of lengthened growing seasons (from warming) and increased CO₂ concentrations has contributed to this increase.
• CO₂ is essential: Plants need CO₂, sunlight, water, and nutrients from the soil to produce food and oxygen, both of which are essential for human and animal lives.
• CO₂ is beneficial: Exposing plants to higher concentrations of CO₂ increases their growth, food production, and drought-resistance; and greens the Earth.
• California is in no danger of unusual drought: The annual precipitation in California has fluctuated greatly over the last 150 years, with only a slight decrease.
• Ski resorts are experiencing more snow: Most (21 of 22) ski resorts in California had increasing snowfall from 2012 to 2023.
• California is in no danger of drowning: North Spit, CA, has the highest rate of sea level rise of 0.005 meter/year, or 1.64 feet in 100 years, which is easily mitigated.
• Less natural disasters over the years: Significantly reduced number of wildfires and acres burned were reported in the United States and globally; California has infrequent tornadoes, no landfalling hurricane from 1851 to 2023, and no tropical depression from 1950 to 2023; and tropical storms are rare in California, with the last two reported in 2023 and 1997.
• Air quality in California keeps getting better: The concentrations of major pollutants have decreased over the years.

In conclusion, there is NO climate crisis in California and CO₂ is essential for all life on Earth. If you need additional details, the CO₂ Coalition will be happy to respond to any inquiries you may have, and the members of the CO₂ Coalition will be happy to meet with you for further discussions. Several members of the CO₂ Coalition have signed the No Climate Emergency Declaration (CO₂ Coalition, 2023).

*******************

The letter is signed by Gregory Wrightstone, Executive Director of the CO2 Coalition.

The summary letter contains a link to the September 2023 “NO Climate Emergency” declaration signed by the 1,600 scientists, including long-time scientist and epidemiologist Dr. James Enstrom: https://co2coalition.org/news/over-1600-scientists-sign-no-climate-emergency-declaration/.

Dr. Enstrom says one of the most prominent signers is 2022 Nobel Laureate John Clauser, who described the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as “one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation,” and was disinvited to speak before the U.N.’s International Monetary Fund (IMF) on July 25, 2023.

“The physicist believes that objective science on climate has been sacrificed to politics. The preeminence of politics is all the worse, he said, because so much money has already gone to climate,” the CO2 Coalition said.

“We’re talking about trillions of dollars,” he said, adding that powerful people don’t want to hear that they’ve made “trillion-dollar mistakes.”

“Concerns about such mistakes may have been what led to his dis-invitation to speak before the IMF,” the CO2 Coalition reported. “Dr. Clauser told The Epoch Times he’d received an email indicating that the IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office Director, Pablo Moreno, did not want the talk to go forward that day.”

“In an email, an IEO senior official told The Epoch Times that Dr. Clauser’s speech ‘has been postponed to reorganize it into a panel discussion. We are working to reschedule it after the summer,’ the official added.

“In recent years, the international economic and monetary agency has focused heavily on climate. Officials have laid particular stress on international carbon taxes. “The latest IMF analysis finds that large emitting countries need to introduce a carbon tax that rises quickly to $75 a ton in 2030,” the agency’s website on climate mitigation states.

[jimfree]

Best graph this year.

[Tell It Right]

Thanks. As another FReeper posted, here are 3 cycles working altogether.

Here are the ice age cycles over the past 2 billion years. We are currently in the Late Cenozoic Ice Age, which has been going on 30-40 million years.

On the far right of that graph are the interglacial cycles within the past half a million years. We are currently in the Holocene interglacial cycle (began maybe 12K years ago).

Then on the far right of that graph are the centuries long warming and cooling periods over the past 10,000 or so years. We are currently in the Modern Warm Period (about 2 centuries long so far), which is part of the larger Holocene Glacial, which is part of the even larger Late Cenozoic Ice Age.

[Forward the Light Brigade]

WWhy am I not surprised?

[HKMk23]

I would bet cash money you could overlay all that “chemtrail” data on top of a map of commercial flight routes, capture photograph dates/times, local data for winds aloft, and successfully correlate all of those images to specific, commercial flights.

EVERY.

LAST.

FEKKING.

ONE.

Now. That stated.
If you run the site, you should host hella ads on it. You’ll make a fekking mint off of the irrational fears of others. Kinda dark, I know, but phobes are gonna phobe, so ya may as well get a nice house and a bitchin’ car outta the deal.

[Theo]

Your gut tells you that, I understand.

It’s easy to just think that these are normal contrails, the vapor trails we learned about in high school.

I invite you to watch the video on https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/the-dimming-full-length-climate-engineering-documentary/ — I find it pretty compelling, pretty unsettling.

[HKMk23]

“Junk” science like in this image just blows the whole deal for me.

https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/pic57.jpg

The caption mentions “ice crystal formation” but that’s not what happens first; initially, the formation is LIQUID WATER condensing in the atmosphere, and -— EXACTLY like steam jetting from a teakettle — there’s VERY OFTEN a visible gap between the exhaust port and the point where the emerging stream of water vapor cools sufficiently to condense. After initial condensation, it will freeze into a fine powder of ice crystals. But it’s a process that involves heat, humidity, dew point at altitude — pointing out a gap between the engine exhaust and the condensation merely serves to expose that, either the person communicating doesn’t know what is going on, OR they know perfectly well but are intentionally trying to deceive others.

BOTH of those scenarios damn their credibility,

ALSO, as regards the trails indicated by the two arrows, every commercial jet of the size shown has an APU — Auxiliary Power Unit — in the fuselage, and the APU has its own exhaust port in the tail cone. The condensation trails indicated by the arrows are created by the APU exhaust.

-— OR -—

...as is also possible...

Aircraft can, and do sometimes dump fuel in flight depending upon fuel load, and proximity to destination; and this also would atomize in the slipstream and leave a foggy trail behind the aircraft.

The site tries to fob itself off as credible, but then commits such blatant errors; advancing such verifiably false “explanations” of what’s seen in the photos, and makes it worse by utterly FAILING to address these other common events.

And none of the commenters exhibit the least scientific inclination whatsoever; none of them report observing overflying aircraft with binoculars to document whether stream formation correlates to the engines on the aircraft, or whether the timing of the trails appearing correlate with commercial flight paths or schedules — all of that EASILY verified with flightaware.com. Everyone wants to jump on the “Oh, I seen it where I live, too” bandwagon, but comments detailing observations of specific aircraft — especially aircraft NOT identifiable as regularly scheduled commercial flights — don’t exist.

NO SALE. As much as I’d like to think that Mr. Wigington is sincere, I’m not gonna grant him credibility in the face of such mammoth gaps in the presented data. It’s very obviously a raft of snake oil salesmanship.