Posted on 05/08/2024 9:42:47 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
Inquiring minds would love to know.
The upside: defense gets some extra time to prepare her complete obliteration on the stand.
She’s back on the stand Thursday.
Daniel’s bumper bullets (155mm actually) needed a new reinforced bra emplaced? who knows? this is really stupid crass porno thing. A washed up madam. Avenatti commentary from 3rd party says she and Cohen were banging and trying to shake down Trump. That line of info would, on its own tear apart a trial for a “crime” that has not yet been charged. The “crime” of improper bookkeeping entry, has already been disproved. This is a show trial concocted by real idiots.
Is this televised?
the judge had the obligation to stop her testimony. i’m betting he’s a little nervous right now,
From “Liar Liar” (1997):
Fletcher Reede: Your honor, I object!
Judge Marshall Stevens: And why is that, Mr. Reede?
Fletcher Reede: Because it’s devastating to my case!
JUDGE ONE MORESCAM
After thoroughly "servicing" Judge Merchandise?
stormy opened a lot of doors with her big mouth. remember...she’s not just a whore...she’s an actress and obviously has her own cliff notes. find her interview of the kimmel show...she is a pig.
You again.
Yep, that’s why...
Luv when you pop into group.
This banana republic judge came here at the age of 6 from Columbia. It would be interesting #1 if he came here legally, and #2 if and when he actually became a citizen.
When President Trump’s lawyers are done with her, I hope to see blood oozing out of her eye sockets.
Maybe he has an “appointment” with stormy?
This may be like a baseball game with the prosecution giving signs to the judge about what to do and when to do it. All these Trump cases appear to be coordinated, scripted, and choreographed.
Well said.
That’s the problem.....Judge “Juanito” sure isnt enforcing American laws.
No — would backfire even more if it were.
Well, yes I believe that was the reason. Can’t have the people of the jury see more of Stormy Daniels without giving the prosecution time to dress her down for her flippant testimony, as she provides terrible optics to the charade of a prosecution case that is a BS load of nonsense potting it in jeopardy of him having to dismiss the case completely.
Good point. Even legal beagles on CNN were embarrassed this case made it to a courtroom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.