Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia announces nuclear weapon drills after angry exchange with senior Western officials
AP ^ | May 6, 2024

Posted on 05/06/2024 2:35:56 AM PDT by McGruff

Russia plans to hold drills simulating the use of tactical nuclear weapons, the Defense Ministry announced Monday, days after the Kremlin reacted angrily to comments by senior Western officials about the war in Ukraine.

The drills are in response to “provocative statements and threats of certain Western officials regarding the Russian Federation,” the Defense Ministry said in a statement.

It was the first time that Russia has publicly announced drills involving tactical nuclear weapons, though its strategic nuclear forces regularly hold exercises. Tactical nuclear weapons have a lower yield compared to massive warheads that arm intercontinental ballistic missiles intended to obliterate entire cities.

The announcement appeared to be a warning to Ukraine’s Western allies about becoming more deeply involved in the more than two-year war. Some of Ukraine’s Western partners have previously expressed concern about stoking the war amid fears it could spill beyond Ukraine and into a conflict between NATO and Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: France; News/Current Events; Russia; War
KEYWORDS: 3daywar; bidenswar; bluff; cluelessneoconsbelow; escalation; foreverwar; killkillkillforpeace; mic; moscowinruins; neoconsarefools; noobiemaximus; putinsfolly; russia; tothelastukrainian; ukraine; welfarewar; worldwariii; ww3; yawn; zeeperscheer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2024 2:35:56 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: McGruff

It’s a bluff.


2 posted on 05/06/2024 2:57:41 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; null and void; Travis McGee; Diogenesis; Red Badger; rx; rxsid; ransomnote; kiryandil; ...
[and into a conflict between NATO and Russia]

Before the November election where Potato Joe would definitely lose, if things were properly counted, NATO in open combat in Ukraine vs. Russia. By October. /shiny side out


3 posted on 05/06/2024 3:23:56 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

What they are definitely planning to do is a covert program of major sabotage in Europe. Like when they blew up an ammo dump in Czechia a couple of years ago. The big fire in Germany last week may be a start.


4 posted on 05/06/2024 3:24:19 AM PDT by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Russia’s Kremlin has labeled recent statements by officials about the war in Ukraine as “dangerous.”

French President Emmanuel Macron said he doesn’t exclude sending troops to Ukraine.

U.K. Foreign Secretary David Cameron said during a visit to Kyiv the same day that Ukraine will be able to use British long-range weapons to strike targets inside Russia.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/kremlin-spox-slams-french-president-uk-foreign-secretary-calling-criticisms-war-ukraine-dangerous


5 posted on 05/06/2024 3:29:19 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

“It’s a bluff.” Maybe. But they are talking drills with tactical nukes. They could test a few on their own territory first. Tacticals can be smaller than what was dropped on Japan and won’t trigger WWIII but the live video will probably scare the crap out of a lot of people. Let’s push them and see what they do.


6 posted on 05/06/2024 3:29:31 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

No kidding it’s a bluff.

However is Z-man stupid enough to do something deadly in Moscow using drones during the Victory Day Celebrations??? That would be a good way to get Kiev erased in a nuclear fireball.


7 posted on 05/06/2024 3:35:33 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

I’m more concerned with what our feckless leaders will do.


8 posted on 05/06/2024 3:37:49 AM PDT by TermLimits4All ("If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

A lot more talk of sending western troops to help the Ukrainians. So much for “good investment” of only Ukrainians fighting. And We continue the slow march to all out war with Russia.

Dear deep state, pick up the freakin phone.


9 posted on 05/06/2024 3:45:33 AM PDT by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; anyone
Hakim Jefferies—-Dem speaker of the house. Also a racist, Trump election win denier (2018), Hugo Chavez communist supporter and more is a CHIEF supporter for sending US troops to Ukraine. Amazing how I see so many conservatives in bed with these leftist scum. (Shadows of how many joined far leftists in attacking Desantis). Hakim Jefferies Statements: 1. Lock up Rittenhouse and throw the key away 2. “… there's a significant likelihood that America will have to get into the conflict” He went on to say a Russian victory goes against “our values”. Well really Hakim? Because I always thought personal self-defense was a foundation of our values even more than defending foreign countries 5000 miles away. IMG-9519
10 posted on 05/06/2024 3:55:49 AM PDT by Phoenix8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

The reason why it is a bluff is because, as that song by Sting went, ‘the Russians love their children too.’ Use of tactical nukes in Ukraine may trigger UNFORESEEN actions by NATO that Russia may not necessarily want to happen.

For example, the entry of NATO proper to Ukraine. Which would result in direct NATO vs Russia war. Which would result in the conventional defeat of Russia. Which would mean that Russia would have to accept conventional defeat, or trigger is anti-NATO strategy in the event of conventional defeat - use of atomics. And thus, even a limited use of that brings ever greater threat of escalation, the end of which would be no winners.

The same calculus exists in the side of NATO, but the likes of France (which has lost a lot of ground in Francophone Africa due to the Russians) and the UK (which is trying to remain relevant) don’t care much and are pushing. Germany is obviously more cautious, as is - believe it or not - the US (as much as Biden and his ilk are rolling crazy dice, some of the idiosyncrasies like the cap on oil prices that is not capped, free flow of Russian fertilizers, drip drip of aid to Ukraine, indicate they are trying to punish Russia as much as they can without triggering global nuclear Gehenna. It may not work out that way.)

As for Russia - huge miscalculation on their side. What they thought would be a repeat of Crimea became a huge smear on their credibility. Sure, they would have defeated Ukraine if it did not get help, and even with help Russia enjoys certain demographic and other advantages over Ukraine that will likely result in a slow grinding ‘victory’ of sorts, but it has cost Russia big time. Huge miscalculation, and I doubt they are willing to make more/greater mathematical fails.

So, a bluff. Russia’s hope is that Germany makes noise, that Poland thinks twice, that British voters wonder what their government is doing, and that Hawks in DC take a short pause.

But they will not use tactical nukes!

The ONLY time they would do that is if Ukraine was in the verge of overwhelming the Russian army, was pushing back hard in the Donbas, and the fall of Crimea was inevitable.

THEN, Russia would definitely use nukes. It is in their clearly available nuclear use doctrine …

… but the US will never allow Ukraine to get that close to winning!

Unless people here really think the West (not the Baltic countries, the ‘proper’ West) actually want Ukraine to win!?!?

:)


11 posted on 05/06/2024 4:16:05 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

Bluff is not the word, terrorist BLACKMAIL is.

Small yield tac nukes are the dirtiest

What is alarming is that we have divested of tactical nukes, ie we have no counter to them but full blown strategic nukes.

Our divesting in tactical nukes make WWIIi much more likely, and one laying on our laps, which is what politically the Soviets always wanted.


12 posted on 05/06/2024 4:41:15 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Russia is a failed state hanging on by the threat of nuclear retaliation.


13 posted on 05/06/2024 4:42:48 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Hamascide is required in totality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

You consider tit for tat.

The instantaneous end of St Petersburgh and Moscow is the actual tat


14 posted on 05/06/2024 4:49:02 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Hamascide is required in totality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Let’s just give the Z-dood a few off the shelf nukes and see what happens... would the raging queen exercise restraint?


15 posted on 05/06/2024 4:49:41 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Well, it’s Monday. I guess it’s time for some small in the shorts Russian drunkard to start yammering about nuclear war.

Sure, they might do it some day. But its more likely they will get vodka smelling vomit on their shoes.


16 posted on 05/06/2024 4:58:30 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
The instantaneous end of St Petersburgh and Moscow is the actual tat

Not before they launch their ICBMs at many US cities.

17 posted on 05/06/2024 5:03:01 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Can you imagine the missiles are launched from Russia and will be her in 15 minutes and Mr. Potatohead has the nuclear codes in his pocket and then has to poke them into the Nuclear Football?

We are doomed...............


18 posted on 05/06/2024 5:07:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bert

European Nigeria with nukes.


19 posted on 05/06/2024 5:08:48 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Proper thinking!

It’s rare on these threads where insults and propaganda from both sides are used.


20 posted on 05/06/2024 5:18:44 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson