Posted on 05/01/2024 4:19:53 PM PDT by Twotone
Edited on 05/01/2024 5:47:47 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
See link.
Qanon said “trust. Kansas” so that’s it.
A friend in power is a friend lost.
The woman interviewing the CIA contractor from Deloitte must be very good looking.
It is amazing how a guy will spill his guts in order to get somewhere with a woman.
GO OMG!!!!!!
Pompeo was the one who recommended Haspel.
I think we all probably know what his motivation was for playing the game of subterfuge on a date.
But then again, who knows? We can assume this man doesn't care for Trump, but even that may be a false assumption, and he was again assessing what the lady in question might want to hear that will get her excited for him if he pretended to hate Trump.
I guess we will have to see what shakes out as a result.
Either way, I suspect it will not end well with him.
I’ve said this before and I will say it again, we need to disband the CIA, eliminate all Black Ops companies and demand complete accounting for all spending from the State Department for the last 30 years so we can prosecute any CIA employee after we fire them.
I don’t think Pompeo “recommended” her. As Trump’s appointed Head of the CIA and Trump wanting Pompeo to take over the State Department Pompeo was surely aware of Gina Haspel - she was one of the senior CIA deputies.
I am sure Trump consulted a number of people and I seriously doubt it was Pompeo who made the final “recommendation”.
I think both Trump and Pompeo IGNORED the proximity that Haspel had to the Russian misinformation pipelines that Steele used so much in putting his hoax dossier together, when he was putting it together. Haspel had been moved back to CIA headquarters before Trump took office.
Lol!
There is a special law that protects CIA executives when telling lies under oath, even to Congress, when they believe it protects deep state interests. So, getting them under oath just gives them an opportunity to plant red herrings.
Sorry but Pompeo is an off-gassing lump of swamp$**t
That law needs to be rescinded.
Government needs to NOT have license to lie, kill, steal, and destroy (Jesus’ description of Satan).
After what Congress just passed, it would be illegal for anybody paid by the federal government to say any of that stuff because it involves truth about (((them))).
What law is that? I’d like to look that up.
Another revelation of treasonous activity within the federal government that cones as a surprise to exactly no one.
Possibly it's the "Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949", aka "Public Law 110", particularly Section 6 on page 37. Like all things swampy, the deep state blob probably has expanded on that law several times since 1949.
The law is very likely unconstitutional, depending on the mood of the Supreme Court.
Appreciated. FWIW, I’m inclined to consider his sincerity.
Assange and Manning etc are/were the bad guys...Our country should have no secrets...you're nuts. He couldn't even get Assange extradited. Assange should be tried and hanged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.