Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds warn employers can be punished for failing to use preferred transgender pronouns, restrooms
Just The News ^ | April 30, 2024 | John Solomon

Posted on 04/30/2024 6:40:27 AM PDT by Red Badger

EEOC's landmark new regulatory guidance elevates gender identity as a protected class under discrimination laws like race, sex and religion.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In landmark guidance, the federal commission created to fight racial and sexual discrimination declared Monday that employers that fail to use a worker's preferred pronoun or refuse them the chance to use the restroom of their choice will be engaging in prohibited harassment.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission published the new harassment guidelines Monday after voting along partisan lines on Friday to approve them, even in the face of opposition from nearly two dozen red states. Three Democratic appointees approved the rules while two Republicans opposed them.

The new document elevates gender identity as a protected class under discrimination laws like race, sex and religion.

Prohibited harassment includes "repeated and intentional use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with the individual’s known gender identity (misgendering) or the denial of access to a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility consistent with the individual’s gender identity,” the new regulatory document declared.

You can read the document here.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-04/Enforcement%20Guidance%20on%20Harassment%20in%20t...qual%20Employment%20Opportunity%20Commission.pdf

Job Creators Network, one of the nation's leading small business groups, decried the new guidance.

"The Biden administration's new guidance on transgender employees is yet another example of executive overreach by unaccountable bureaucrats," Job Creators Network CEO Alfredo Ortiz said. "The guidance is a solution in search of a problem, as the overwhelming majority of employers already provide their employees with a respectful working environment, no matter what their backgrounds.

"While the Biden administration is focused on using the correct pronouns, small businesses are suffering under the weight of resurgent inflation, high energy costs, and a credit crunch due to Democrats' bad policies. Rules about how to treat transgender employees amount to another headache for employers at the worst possible time," he added.

The guidance offered a hypothetical example of the sort of conduct that will be prohibited in workplaces going forward.

"Chloe, a purchase order coordinator at a retail store warehouse, is approached by her supervisor, Alton, who asks whether she was 'born a man' because he had heard a rumor that 'there was a transvestite in the department.' Chloe disclosed to Alton that she is transgender and asked him to keep this information confidential," the regulatory document states. "After this conversation, Alton instructed Chloe to wear pants to work because a dress would be 'inappropriate,' despite other purchase order coordinators being permitted to wear dresses and skirts.

"Alton also asks inappropriate questions about Chloe’s anatomy and sexual relationships. Further, whenever Alton is frustrated with Chloe, he misgenders her by using, with emphasis, “he/him” pronouns, sometimes in front of Chloe’s coworkers. Based on these facts, Alton’s harassing conduct toward Chloe is based on her gender identity," the document states.

EEOC Chairwoman Charlotte A. Burrows argued the changes were necessitated by the Supreme Court’s Bostock v. Clayton decision in 2020 that found that a company would be in violation of Title VII anti-discrimination laws if it fired a worker “simply for being … transgender.”

But 20 Republican state attorneys general told the EEOC last November that the agency's efforts to impose restrictions on pronouns and bathrooms were not authorized by the ruling or by any action of Congress. “Bostock gives no license to these and other of EEOC’s novel proposals," the attorneys generals wrote.

You can read that letter here.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2024-04/AGsBostockLetter.pdf


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Red Badger

Can someone declare as a ‘Double Trans’?

Like a trans trans male, or trans trans female.

Would that null out back to normal, or result in ‘he-she’ pronouns?

Oops, that should be ‘she-he’, you’re fired!


61 posted on 04/30/2024 8:31:00 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I am not going to refer to a man as “she” just because he’s wearing a dress. I’m not going to indulge their twisted little fetishes.


62 posted on 04/30/2024 8:33:39 AM PDT by Allegra (Less propaganda would be appreciated. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This more demonstration for why we should never create these agencies with these regulatory powers in the first place.


63 posted on 04/30/2024 8:34:33 AM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

My preferred pronouns are “SpiderMonkey” and “LoveFactory”.


64 posted on 04/30/2024 8:36:30 AM PDT by Lazamataz (To anyone who also wants to see the Stealth Liberal 'joesbucks' banned, contact me by Freepmail. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
The first thing you do is CLOSE the bathrooms permanently and have porta potties
Better yet, single use unisex ADA compliant locker and restroom facilities. But then the exhibitionist and voyeur "communities" will bitch and moan. The hustle never ends
65 posted on 04/30/2024 8:40:30 AM PDT by Impala64ssa (Laiken Riley is my daughter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That insures these nuts jobs don’t get hired.


66 posted on 04/30/2024 8:59:33 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

I remember something about that. Thanks.

We all miss Rush. Boy, he’d be tearing them up now.


67 posted on 04/30/2024 9:02:00 AM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Easy solution to this. Request preferred pronouns on employment applications. Any application with those filled out goes directly into the circular file.


68 posted on 04/30/2024 9:22:38 AM PDT by grateful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“I wasn’t referring to that person’s gender, I was referring to that person’s biology. You cannot prove otherwise.
However, the fact that I referred to that person with the biologically correct pronoun is evidence of my intent.”


69 posted on 04/30/2024 9:29:14 AM PDT by Ignatz (The bees don't bother to tell the flies that honey tastes better than dung.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

In certain circumstances it could be such a violation.


70 posted on 04/30/2024 9:37:55 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

These people are using Orwell as a playbook.

Anything not forbidden is mandatory...


71 posted on 04/30/2024 9:46:47 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yep, I was born and raised here in NE Kansas on a farm. We didn’t know a helluva lot because we were in that “basket of deplorables” or people who “clung to their guns and religion”.
But we sure as hell knew the difference between a steer and a heifer calf. Color me stupid I guess.


72 posted on 04/30/2024 11:27:44 AM PDT by kawhill (kawhill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xoxox
for gawdsakes just don’t begin a sentence with them.

Better yet, don't hire them.

73 posted on 04/30/2024 11:52:20 AM PDT by fwdude ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pox
Can’t wait until this BS is finally put to rest in the courts.

The Supreme Court, where Roberts and Gorsuch put a bludgeon in the hands of the deviants?

74 posted on 04/30/2024 11:53:26 AM PDT by fwdude ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Why, that’s discrimination! If you refuse to hire weirdos who want to wear animal costumes or think they’re some different gender, you are nothing but a bigot. How dare you demand that they do something useful. Have you no decency!/sarc


75 posted on 04/30/2024 12:20:52 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

When will all businesses require their employees to sign a statement that they won’t sue the business for any sexual assaults in restrooms by trannies? Or that the employer isn’t responsible for any violations of this “guidance” by employees?


76 posted on 04/30/2024 3:00:42 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson