Posted on 04/22/2024 11:36:00 AM PDT by Red Badger
Alvin Bragg doesn’t have a case, he has a kangaroo court.
“he has a kangaroo court”
A full on furry case and court....
Problems with the fake trial
Could Trump use his resources to go after these leftists - personally - for misconduct, defamation, etc to personally bankrupt them?
Yes.....................
Trump should file misconduct or defamation suits against them in Florida. Two can play this game!
This case against Trump, other being a political persecution, hinges heavily on contact law. The DA will have to prove that there was a valid contract in part by signature or performance or agency etc.
These idiots are giving Trump NEW ways to prosecute the left on his entry to President.
Couldn’t the prosecutor just write in Trump’s signature in purple crayon?
That would be sufficient for the judge to be sure.
In this case there is no signature at all! So how can tehre even be a ‘case’ in the first place?......................................
“ Couldn’t the prosecutor just write in Trump’s signature in purple crayon?
That would be sufficient for the judge to be sure.”
***********************************
Prosecutor Bragg? There’s a good chance he CAN’T DO CURSIVES.
Alvin Bragg faced years of oppression and was forced to attend
an inner city school. Reading was not required to graduate.
We used to say “You can indict a ham sandwich”.
Now the media implies, “Trump was indicted. Multiple times. So he’s obviously guilty of everything.”
They have no case. They know they have no case. But they want to smear Trump with all the Nothing in their possession.
Turley said this afternoon the trial is a farce. Also mention the James case sayin her next move may be to order pizzas and send to Trumps house.
You can prove a contract through other means such as performance, ratification, agency etc
If you are an attorney can you explain any of this:
He’s charged under the following statute (per the indictment)
§175.05 – 10A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the second degree
when, with intent to defraud, he:
Makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an
enterprise; or
§175.10 when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
§200.50An indictment must contain:
7. A plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature,
(a) asserts facts supporting every element of the offense charged and the defendant’s or defendants’ commission thereof with sufficient precision to clearly apprise the defendant or defendants of the conduct which is the subject of the accusation; and
As far as I can tell, there are at least 3 elements:
1. false statement
2. intent to defraud
3. intent to commit or conceal another crime.
The indictment only addresses the false statement. Who did he defraud by calling it a legal expense? and of what?
In the last week, I’ve heard probably 20 different “defense attorneys” claim that Trump will be acquitted, Trump is screwed, or some variation on both of those themes. It’s hard to put much faith in any of their opinions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.