Posted on 04/15/2024 6:24:50 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
In Addition to being prohibited from attending my son Barron’s High School Graduation, I have just learned that the highly biased Judge in the Soros “appointed” D.A. Alvin Bragg’s Witch Hunt Case, will not allow me to attend the historic PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY argument in front of The United States Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 25th (next week!).
(Excerpt) Read more at truthsocial.com ...
It's probably better you post less. You're not that bright.
I saw that
He’s been on the go non-stop. He needs a break.
A well reasoned and dispassionate reply that addresses the issue succinctly.
Well done.
Yup.
‘You’re not that bright.’
I’m aware.
On what grounds can a father not go to his sons graduation ceremony?
On the grounds that a judge ordered him to be in court for his criminal trial. Right or wrong, the judge can do that.
I think he was mocking them, like, this is not worth my energy. And it went right over thier heads. They don’t scare him.
Barron is being deprived of what and by whom?
The timing could not be better. What's happening in New York City today is exactly what future Presidents should fear when making executive decisions in a divided government.
If there are no limits on what a corrupt city burough DA could do, like taking a federal charge he can't prosecute to revive a misdemeanor charge he can't prosecute, and then harass the leading opposition candidate to interfere with his election campaign, then there should be no limits on Presidential immunities to prevent it from happening again.
The Bragg case itself wouldn't be affected by Presidential immunity (Trump wasn't President when the payments were supposedly made), but the behaviors of the Attorneys General, District Attorneys, federal investigators, and trial judges generally need to be reined in when dealing with decisions that Presidents made while still in office.
-PJ
Trump is not being charged for crimes related to executive decisions.
Yeah but who is to say that trial date will be the same as his son’s graduation. I mean is it?
-PJ
Complete lie. Not surprised.
I was talking about how the behaviors exhibited by the players in this case would be repeated by prosecutors in other cases if the boundaries of immunity are defined too narrowly.
-PJ
Pretty bold or should I say foolish statements to make without proof.
Yes.
I was actually taking your side on the argument about Trump attending SCOTUS, but you're too blinded to see that.
-PJ
Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... Ha... trial my arse... more like a kangaroo court with clowns and monkeys. Have yet to figure out whether you’re a clown or monkey. Prolly a little of both, I suspect.
FO.
You’re on the wrong forum. I guess you haven’t seen the statement where the “actress” in question, denied the affair herself. This is just more made up bullshit where the idiots involved are happy to follow orders....for a price.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.