Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking! Judge Merchan rules Trump not allowed to attend the historic PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY argument in front of The United States Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 25th
Donald J. Trump Truth Social ^ | April 15, 2024 | Donald J. Trump

Posted on 04/15/2024 6:24:50 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

In Addition to being prohibited from attending my son Barron’s High School Graduation, I have just learned that the highly biased Judge in the Soros “appointed” D.A. Alvin Bragg’s Witch Hunt Case, will not allow me to attend the historic PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY argument in front of The United States Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 25th (next week!).

(Excerpt) Read more at truthsocial.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alvinbragg; jacksmith; judgechutkan; judgeeileencannon; judgemerchan; lawfare; maralago; merchan; scotus; tdserbelow; trump; trumpimmunity; trumppersecution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: Fuzz
The lawyers who do speak in front of SCOTUS work for their client. The client needs to be there.

No. They don’t.

It is in the interest of the client to be there when their lawyer represents them. If you can't see why, I can't help you further.

41 posted on 04/15/2024 7:13:19 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

Fourth-this is not about who banged who or when, since no one was a witness, and both supposed participants were adults.


42 posted on 04/15/2024 7:13:57 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I can see his interest in being there, it’s just not legally necessary.


43 posted on 04/15/2024 7:14:28 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

Technically yes.

He’s not on trial for having an affair or multiple affairs.

Still, not required to attend the arguments in front of the Supreme Court for blanket presidential immunity.


44 posted on 04/15/2024 7:17:35 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz
It is in the interest of the client to be there when their lawyer represents them.

I can see his interest in being there, it’s just not legally necessary

Okay then. I worded the point better.

It's the petitioner's right.

45 posted on 04/15/2024 7:20:19 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

He has the right to petition, he does not have the right or obligation to attend.

The petitioner is represented by council. Trump would say or do nothing but watch.

He is however obligated to be in court for his felony trial.


46 posted on 04/15/2024 7:25:33 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

“Third, if Barron means so much to him, maybe don’t boink a porn actress when your wife just gave birth to the kid.”

Be a good little worm and go crawl back under the manure pile you crawled out from.


47 posted on 04/15/2024 7:26:40 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

I was not referring to the SC argument or lack of it. I’m not a lawyer and I don’t play one on TV-are you? I do know that non-disclosure agreements are legal and binding, and are not just for sexcapades-they also can also involve boring stuff like industrial spying, computer programming and even recipes at a restaurant...


48 posted on 04/15/2024 7:27:27 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Do defendants normally attend SCOTUS hearings?

I’ve got a friend who’s litigated twice in front of them over probate and bankruptcy issues

2-0


49 posted on 04/15/2024 7:30:02 PM PDT by wardaddy (. A disease in the public mind btw Alina Habba is fine as grits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“BREAKING: Donald Trump speaks out after Judge Merchan informed him that he could not attend his son Barron’s high school graduation or he will be jailed.”

Unwad your panties.


50 posted on 04/15/2024 7:31:37 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Is that where I would find the logical reasoning so prevent on these threads?


51 posted on 04/15/2024 7:32:27 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

They are used for many things.

He isn’t being charged for paying for an nda.


52 posted on 04/15/2024 7:33:54 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Amen. To the scumbag - did you not see the signed letter from the past her prime fleshh peddler that there was no affair (not that it legally matters) and no hush money? Or that cohen has been declared a serial perjurer? Yeah...gfy


53 posted on 04/15/2024 7:35:18 PM PDT by angrymarine (I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: angrymarine

Yes. She has addressed that. It was because of the nda she signed and was compensated for.

Did you not see her comments or what she wrote since then?

Wait a few weeks until the testimony.


54 posted on 04/15/2024 7:39:05 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

” maybe don’t boink a porn actress when your wife just gave birth to the kid.”

You dickhead, he didn’t. Trump is famous as a germaphobe. No way he touched Stormy the human petri dish.


55 posted on 04/15/2024 7:39:28 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

The judge hasn’t decided but you have. You are sure this happened and it really not decided yet. So you just are biased.


56 posted on 04/15/2024 7:40:22 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Awww. Cute.

You must not be in the NYC area. He’s cheated on every wife. Even grabbed women by the p***sy and moved on them like a bitch. Goes back decades.

But yeah, he’s pristine.


57 posted on 04/15/2024 7:44:12 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Aww. Did you;think you made a good point? Adorable.


58 posted on 04/15/2024 7:46:56 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz
He has the right to petition, he does not have the right or obligation to attend.

When one's liberty is at stake they certainly have the right to attend.

59 posted on 04/15/2024 7:47:13 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Right to attend in a legal sense? Not aware of any right that’s being legally violated here.


60 posted on 04/15/2024 7:52:53 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson