Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Aileen Cannon Rejects Trump Request to Dismiss Documents Case
Breitbart ^ | 04/04/2024 | KRISTINA WONG

Posted on 04/04/2024 2:00:58 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon denied former President Donald Trump’s request to dismiss the documents case in a ruling on Thursday.

Trump’s team had argued that the Presidential Records Act takes priority over the Espionage Act when it came to highly classified documents he took to Mar-a-Lago after he left office, but Cannon rejected the request to dismiss the case on those grounds, writing in the filing, “The Presidential Records Act does not provide a pre-trial basis to dismiss.”

Cannon also defended herself against attacks from Special Counsel Jack Smith, who had harshly criticized a request she gave both parties. He argued that the judge’s request embraced Trump’s view of the Presidential Records Act, allowing him to consider government documents as “personal.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cannon; dimiss; documents; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Thoughts concerns?
1 posted on 04/04/2024 2:00:58 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I think she’s enjoying making Jack Smith look like a fool.


2 posted on 04/04/2024 2:02:41 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Keep track of all these judges and persecutors.

Regardless of what the candy-arses think, revenge is sweet.


3 posted on 04/04/2024 2:06:16 PM PDT by ABStrauss (I miss Rush! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
I think so too.

Notice that she did not rule that the Presidential Records Act does not apply - only that there is no provision for a pre trial dismissal.

Trump can re file this dismissal once the trial takes place - in the future. Once the motion is filed it will take several weeks at minimum to rule and even if she does not dismiss, Trump will have the right to appeal .

This case is not going to go to trial for a long time, almost certainly after the election.

4 posted on 04/04/2024 2:08:16 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Some people are claiming the PRA defense are bogus. Thoughts?


5 posted on 04/04/2024 2:09:40 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Cannon will be verfy famlous inUS history. She is following established procedural law while simultaneously trolling Jack ( Off) Smith.

Cannon will rope a dope Smith right into his obvious avanue of ideologial insanity, right up tio NOvember 5th wigthout going to trial. All the TRuimp legal team need to keep doing is bringing procedural motions that have just enough teeth. The Discovery motions alone have endless possibilities, because JAck Off Smith doesnt want anyone to see the poop on the assassination attempt planned for PDJT on Jan 6th, that failed. Cannon wants it to leak out.The documents seized from Trump were proof of the failed plot.


6 posted on 04/04/2024 2:10:09 PM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=300</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I think she wants it to go to trial with a not guilty verdict. Will make it nearly impossible for Jack Schitt to appeal successfully.


7 posted on 04/04/2024 2:10:10 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (We used to be a Republic, we are now a Fascist Klepto-Thugocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

She did a tactical retreat in the face of Smith’s bloviating temper tantrum.


8 posted on 04/04/2024 2:11:16 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Judge Cannon is the cat and Jack Smith is the mouse. Lots of play time left before meal time.


9 posted on 04/04/2024 2:16:21 PM PDT by JPG ("...if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“”Thoughts concerns?””

No concerns but my thoughts are these people make it up as they go along....If it flies, fine, if it doesn’t, they just change their minds hoping no one notices...like throwing everything at a wall to see what sticks. We’re bombarded with garbage day in, day out.


10 posted on 04/04/2024 2:20:37 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

I kind of expected. This would be the outcome in terms of the dismissal, but it’s definitely not helping Jack Smith’s case right now.


11 posted on 04/04/2024 2:21:17 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What this does is make the case a winner for Trump that cannot be appealed by the prosecution. She can still dismiss later.

Once it goes to the jury, and they get her instructions, it’s basically over for Trump. If she dismissed it, it could be appealed.

It’s true legal judo.


12 posted on 04/04/2024 2:50:15 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

Correct.


13 posted on 04/04/2024 2:50:29 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

My God they are ALL EFFIN CORRUPT! These POS have destroyed any ounce of honor and trust they had! I don’t trust them one iota….the evil corrupt black robe club IS VERY DEEP and completely VERY CORRUPT! The justice system needs a great big overhaul up their asses! Yet FJB TOOK top secret chit docs when HE WAS JUST A FREAKING SENATOR to write an effin book and the POS skated! SICK OFTHIS DOUBLE STANDARD of justice….Enough!!


14 posted on 04/04/2024 3:07:21 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Judge Cannon is showing the country what a lawful judge and a lawful trial looks like.

-PJ

15 posted on 04/04/2024 3:13:26 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

She will be overturned because the law is very clear, As is the case in all of the cases there is no there there.


16 posted on 04/04/2024 3:53:12 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

They are full of crap and politically motivated liars. Also there were no classified documents in his possession. Even the government doesn’t claim that. They carefully call them “documents with classified markings”.
He was not charged under the laws regarding classified documents. He was charged under the wide ranging Espionage Act for having “National Defense Information”.
That Espionage law does not require it be classified.

The PRA sets the President as the final authority on what documents he can possess. This was already litigated in the Clinton era.

“The socks ruling addressed whether a private party — Judicial Watch — could get a court to order the archivist to determine whether Clinton had improperly designated the audiotapes recorded during his presidency as personal.
​​”The court concluded that the Presidential Records Act did not give the judiciary that authority to require that of the Archivist,”

PRA applies. Trump had no classified information. The Archivist cannot overrule the President. The FBI was searching for the records Trump declassified about the five eyes/CIA/FBI Russiagate scam.


17 posted on 04/04/2024 5:23:39 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

And Jack Smith is a low quality lawyer, constantly overturned, mistrials, advancing weird legal theories, has practiced most of his life outside the USA, made his life in Holland, and has the rare honor of being overturned 8-0 (Actually 9-0) by the US Supreme Court.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jul/4/jack-smiths-record-rife-mistrials-overturned-convi/


18 posted on 04/04/2024 5:29:38 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

You don’t know what you are talking about. The law and case law clearly supports him. You’ll see soon enough sport.


19 posted on 04/04/2024 5:31:47 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Don’t tell the hopium addicts that.


20 posted on 04/04/2024 5:33:11 PM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king (Just a Texas Playboy at heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson