Posted on 04/03/2024 2:27:10 PM PDT by thegagline
Documents for Donald Trump's $175 million bond in his New York civil fraud case were rejected by a court because a current financial statement was not included.
On Wednesday, a message on the New York State Supreme Court's electronic filing system showed Trump's "Bond/Undertaking" had been "returned for correction."New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron ruled in February against Trump; his two eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump; and others associated with the Trump Organization.
They were accused in a lawsuit from New York Attorney General Letitia James of inflating the former president's net worth and the value of his properties to obtain better loan and insurance terms. Trump has denied all accusations.
On Monday, Trump posted a $175 million bond in the case, ensuring that James does not seize any of his assets or bank accounts during his appeal. *** The New York County Supreme Court document he shared read:
The court has returned the documents listed below for the following reasons: Please include a current financial statement and Power of Attorney. Additionally, please list the name of the Attorney-in-Fact under the signature line on the Undertaking. Please use the 'Refile Document' link for Doc. No. 1707 to resubmit the corrected filing. Thank you and have a great day."
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
The whole premise of any ‘damage’ caused to NYS as a result of bank loan collateral proposed by Trump for any load is hugely improper. It suffered NO damage nor could have.
“”Trump has never done anything illegal””
That’s a pretty weird statement to make. How do you know? “Never” is a pretty strong word....I’m not saying he has or hasn’t as I certainly don’t know but neither does anyone else...
Not a trap at all. Because the supposed crime is to over evaluate, not under evaluate.
What you say makes a lot of sense...everything definitely should apply to the original case. Anything else is pure fishing...James should be asked if she has a fishing license!!
“That’s a pretty weird statement to make. How do you know? “Never” is a pretty strong word....I’m not saying he has or hasn’t as I certainly don’t know but neither does anyone else..”
Name one thing illegal that Trump has done.
Have a great banana republic!
oh there is certainly some way out of the trap, but I just pointed out that it is a potential trap either way if done without thinking through things.
“”Name one thing illegal that Trump has done.””
That’s even more strange. Did you or did you not read my reply? I said I don’t know and neither does anyone else. That’s a pretty safe statement so what makes you so sure he hasn’t?
I have not read the court file, but typically the bond principal does not file a finacial statement, power of attorney, etc. I am near certain that the idiots at Newsweek are referring to the surety (the company writing the bond). I suspect the person uploading the bond only uploaded the bond, but not the surety financial statement and power of attorney. Happens all the time in haste.
I can provide a more tailed explanation later when I am not typing on phone.
You are correct. See post 50.
“ That’s a pretty safe statement so what makes you so sure he hasn’t?”
Disregarding your judgemental statement, and regarding your answer that you cannot name one illegal thing Trump has done, tell us, why, after eight years of searching with the best investigators known to the U.S. government looking for something, anything illegal Trump has done in his 70+ years have they failed to find it?
I think conservatives do see it that way, but liberals are the kind of people who can watch it happen, have the government state why it happened and say they can do it to anybody, but the liberal will think he is somehow immune from that.
The liberal is wrong. They will do it to them The liberal sees the Clinton’s Obamas and Biden’s with a ton of money and they vote for them to be in the club. To get money they don’t earn. Then they end up being poor and enslaved.
I know they would, but the liberal. They won’t believe you.
Democrats never use the word Republic.
We have been on the train since GW, just haven't noticed yet.
“I know they would, but the liberal. They won’t believe you.”
What does that matter?
Tge liberal spends his life convincing himself of untruths. Surrounds himself with like thinkers. Negating people who don’t believe him.
I don’t do that to him.
His not seeing the truth doesn’t change the truth
That’s because their country is a Reich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.