Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Lindell Teases Supreme Court Evidence
Newsweek ^ | Kate Plumber

Posted on 03/12/2024 6:24:22 AM PDT by joesbucks

Mike Lindell has said that he will bring explosive new evidence to the Supreme Court regarding Kari Lake's bid to challenge the use of electronic tabulation systems.

Speaking to Steve Bannon on the podcast War Room, the MyPillow CEO said he had strong evidence in the case that would help him save this country.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; cryptodemocrat; joesdemocrats; karilake; kateplumber; mikelindell; newsweek; okboomer; stevebannon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
Here we go again. No financial guarantee of authenticity this time.
1 posted on 03/12/2024 6:24:22 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
No financial guarantee of authenticity this time.

Could you elaborate?

2 posted on 03/12/2024 6:26:33 AM PDT by JesusIsLord ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

This guy just needs to go away. He is our version of a kook that gets headlines that in no way help Trump.


3 posted on 03/12/2024 6:31:41 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

I agree. I want to like Mike but I think he’s a nut.


4 posted on 03/12/2024 6:34:03 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

A Federal Judge in the last couple of weeks has ruled that Lindell must pay the 5 million he put up as a challenge to his data that was shown at the Cyber Symposium a couple of years ago.

The ruling supports the Arbitrator that ruled the same way.

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/federal-judge-affirms-mypillow-mike-lindell-must-pay-5m-in-election-data-dispute/

Of course, Lindell is going to appeal and not pay the guy right now, I don’t think he will be offering any financial guarantees anytime soon.


5 posted on 03/12/2024 6:34:05 AM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

He is a naive idiot who is unaware of how little credibility he has left on this topic, even among conservatives.


6 posted on 03/12/2024 6:35:10 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

A couple of years ago Mike Lindell put on a Cyber Symposium, where he claimed he had packet captures that would show the Chinese hacked the 2020 election and stole it from Trump.

He offered a 5-million-dollar challenge to anyone who could prove the packet captures didn’t show what he claimed, fairly quickly a computer engineer did prove the packet captures were false.

Lindell refused to pay, the computer engineer sued, a court appointed arbitrator ruled against Lindell, who refused to pay and recently a Federal Judge ruled that Lindell should pay up and he’s refused to pay up again pledging to appeal to a higher court.

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/federal-judge-affirms-mypillow-mike-lindell-must-pay-5m-in-election-data-dispute/


7 posted on 03/12/2024 6:38:54 AM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Expecting real evidence from Lindell is like Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown


8 posted on 03/12/2024 6:41:50 AM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (The “only Trumpers” are just as damaging to the conservative cause as are the “never Trumpers”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

He was scammed by Dennis Montgomery and a couple of other pseudo-experts. Can’t admit he was snookered.


9 posted on 03/12/2024 6:44:03 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I am pretty sure that the Supreme Court (whether State or Federal) is not the place to enter new evidence. Those places are to settle questions of law, not guilt or innocence.

If Mike thinks he is going to walk in with new evidence, they will slap him back pretty hard.


10 posted on 03/12/2024 6:48:39 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

If you read the entire story of Dennis Montgomery a lot of people knew he was a fraud and scam artist, but Lindell was so invested in the idea that the 2020 election was stolen he bought off on a fraud, as you say, he can’t back down now and admit he was scammed.

The 2020 election was fraudulent, just not in the way Lindell believes, certainly not from Chinese hackers and he had the packet captures to prove it.

Anyone with a fundamental understanding of computer networking and how someone gathers packet captures would almost immediately know his claims were a fraud.


11 posted on 03/12/2024 6:49:09 AM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

Yeah, I know all about Montgomery and then some. Very much in agreement with you.


12 posted on 03/12/2024 6:52:27 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

At least, Lindell has gotten-up, off of his ass and is doing “something” to save this country from perdition; unlike the usual “subject matter experts” who constantly bloviate and contribute nothing! And, who offer no substantive facts for their attacks on Lindell!


13 posted on 03/12/2024 6:53:47 AM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: old school

He’s better looking than Sidney Powell.


14 posted on 03/12/2024 6:56:02 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: old school

Contributing easily refuted “evidence” is not helping. It is damaging!


15 posted on 03/12/2024 6:56:25 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

put up or shut up.


16 posted on 03/12/2024 6:57:08 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Another Kraaken.


17 posted on 03/12/2024 6:58:28 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

What easily refuted “evidence?” And who is refuting it? The crooks?


18 posted on 03/12/2024 7:01:43 AM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: old school

Nope! People who actually understand networks.


19 posted on 03/12/2024 7:07:18 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reily

I’m a person, who needs details, not generalities! Prove it!


20 posted on 03/12/2024 7:10:23 AM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson