Posted on 03/09/2024 4:27:08 AM PST by CFW
Afederal judge on Friday dismissed a challenge from 21 states against a Biden administration program that allows 30,000 asylum-seekers into the U.S. from four countries each month.
U.S. District Judge Drew B. Tipton ruled that Texas and 20 other Republican-led states didn’t have legal standing in the lawsuit because they didn’t demonstrate suffered financial harm from the federal program, the Associated Press reported. The program lets a total of up to 30,000 asylum-seekers enter the U.S. each month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
“In reaching this conclusion, the Court does not address the lawfulness of the Program,” Tipton wrote in his ruling.
The states argued that the program forces them to spend millions of dollars on health care, education, and public safety for the asylum-seekers.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
I hope the majority of the voters are just as ticked off as I am over the Democrat's open borders. That is the main thing that is destroying our nation (which of course is the reason the left is so hell-bent on keeping the border open).
more enemies
Tipton was nominated by Trump…
I know him this is surprising.
Oh Im sure the black American citizens in Illinois would easily and gladly prove that they “have legal standing in the lawsuit because they (can) demonstrate suffered financial harm from the federal program”
"states didn’t have legal standing in the lawsuit because they didn’t demonstrate [that they] suffered financial harm from the federal program"
Especially since financial harm is easy to prove.
Just shove the bills for Medicaid costs under his nose.
They can use "standing" to avoid actually having to think about it - similar to all of the country's "zero tolerance" rules/laws.
It's like the first decision block of a decision tree diagram.
Standing? ->Yes
|
v
No
If no, reject the matter regardless of law or common sense, and and hit the bar.
Reference 2020 election rulings.
There are not 30,000 asylum-seekers on the planet in a year
If they come in.... ok....NO
1. MEDICAID / HEALTHCARE
2. WELFARE / FOOD STAMPS
3. FREE HOUSING
4. DRIVERS LICENSE
5. EDUCATION FOR KIDS
6. CITIZENSHIP FOR BABIES BORN HERE
This is just about the worst case of a failed judiciary as we’ve seen in some time.
The States bear the costs, but the ‘judge’ determines that’s not harm to the States?
Bull Puckey!
They used lack of standing to dismiss all the lawsuits about the vote as well.
Bad trend. Maybe NYC and Chicago could sue. Maybe the hospitals and schools should sue.
Another recommendation by RINOs no doubt.
U.S. District Judge Drew B. Tipton
Nuts. Some of Trump’s nominees have not been the best and once they are confirmed, they are beyond reach.
Who the heck are you measly states thinking you actually have “standing”…
Our system is broken.
Wonder how long until all these “Trojan Horses” are called to action....
Does a judge also have the power to allow 30,000 burglaries a month?
Sadly could be not enough ticked off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.