Posted on 02/28/2024 5:07:29 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
By now, we all realize that our government and many of our so-called “esteemed institutions” are steeped in massive corruption. Yet, even so, the sheer audacity of this corruption can still stun even the most jaded among us. That’s what has happened with the recent developments in the so-called “rape case” involving E. Jean Carroll, a weird and controversial “sexual writer,” who once called rape “sexy” during an interview on CNN.
In a move that baffles the mind, the judge, without any concrete evidence, has suggested that Trump might be guilty of an alleged “rape” that supposedly occurred in a department store dressing room decades ago.
But the plot thickens when we take a deep dive into the judge’s political leanings, which have recently come to light, unveiling a web of potential political bias. Remarkably, this is the same judge appointed by Bill Clinton, of all womanizing people, who had previously dismissed charges against the notoriously controversial Prince Andrew. Andrew faced accusations from Jeffrey Epstein’s victims of horrific acts involving minors. These women bravely came forward with firsthand accounts of their ordeals, providing details that are compelling and impossible to dismiss as mere political vendettas. The difference in judicial reactions casts yet another disturbing light on the non-stop corruption within our system. This is a very concerning scenario that challenges us to seriously question the integrity of our legal system and the unseen forces and bribes that are likely shaping its decisions.
A U.S. judge dismissed the sex abuse lawsuit against Britain’s Prince Andrew on Tuesday, three weeks after lawyers for the American woman who filed it reached a deal calling for the prince to make a substantial donation to his accuser’s charity and declare he never meant to malign her character.
(Excerpt) Read more at revolver.news ...
I have no questions about our legal system's "integrity." I am quite certain it has none.
reached a deal calling for the prince to make a substantial donation to his accuser’s charity and declare he never meant to malign her character.
We’re going to get The Mexico Model.
I'm waiting for a Corruption Tax. Were we pay them not to be corrupt. And it goes up 10% a year.
In a sane world it would not be safe for these people anywhere on the planet.
“...has suggested that Trump might be guilty of an alleged “rape””
Might be guilty? Might?
That disgusting vile little worm will be overturned and then Trump should sue the little bastard. Then let’s see if he squeals about judicial immunity.
Hey, what a great time to “learn” this.
I assume you have used your lamp in the darkest reaches of the current American “justice” system to confirm what we all figured was true.
Fabio - time to pack your bags buddy.
Had to be either Black or Jewish. Seems like those two groups make up 95% of the Judges these days.
I have observed the incompetence and injustice of our legal system all my life from national stories and articles detailing how they blundered/botched cases before them. I have some direct experience with observing courts blundering/botching cases, and what I have seen with my own eyes is that they more often than not get it wrong.
I perceive my local courts as just incompetent, while I perceive many national courts as lying/corrupt/evil.
Yes, our judicial system is a dysfunctional mass of ritual which places "procedure" above justice.
LIB/leftists have made a mockery of the US judiciary. Pathetic morons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.