Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump says he ‘strongly’ supports IVF, calls on Alabama lawmakers to ‘find an immediate solution’ for keeping treatment option available
The New York Post ^ | 02/23/2024 | Patrick Reilly

Posted on 02/23/2024 4:33:52 PM PST by thegagline

Former President Donald Trump said he supports in vitro fertilization treatment after Alabama’s highest court ordered hospitals to stop offering the procedure.

Trump took to Truth Social Friday to call on the state’s lawmakers to preserve access to IVF days after The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

“Like the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of Americans, including the VAST MAJORITY of Republicans, Conservatives, Christians, and Pro-Life Americans, I strongly support the availability of IVF for couples who are trying to have a precious baby,” Trump railed online.

“Today, I am calling on the Alabama Legislature to act quickly to find an immediate solution to preserve the availability of IVF in Alabama,” he said.

The ex-president often trumpets how the conservative Supreme Court Justices he appointed ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade, ending federal protections for abortion rights and sparking state-level efforts nationwide to cut women’s access to the procedure.

But he has also criticized certain hardline anti-abortion policies in some states.

The all-Republican Alabama Supreme court found that an 1872 state law allowing parents to sue over the death of a minor child “applies to all unborn children, regardless of their location.”

Critics blasted the potential impact on fertility treatments and the freezing of embryos — which had previously been considered property by the courts.

Since the ruling, two of Alabama’s IVF providers have suspended portions of its care to patients.

Alabama Fertility Services said in a statement Thursday that it has “made the impossibly difficult decision to hold new IVF treatments due to the legal risk to our clinic and our embryologists.”

On Wednesday, the University of Alabama at Birmingham health system said it was pausing IVF treatments so it could evaluate whether its patients or doctors could face criminal charges or punitive damages.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alabama; democratconcerntroll; democratskillbabies; embryo; invitrofertilization; ivf; life; nevertrumpingtroll; politics; rinosmurderbabies; romneybabykiller; rubbersbush; thefagline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2024 4:33:52 PM PST by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thegagline
“Like the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of Americans, including the VAST MAJORITY of Republicans, Conservatives, Christians, and Pro-Life Americans, I strongly support the availability of IVF for couples who are trying to have a precious baby,” Trump railed online.

Creating a bunch of embryos (new human organisms) to simply be disposed of and never used for pregnancies is not the way to do that.

2 posted on 02/23/2024 4:52:18 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

They are NOT viable in a frozen state. Until they’re implanted and “accepted”, they are NOT beings...And if I remember correctly, many are destroyed all the time in the process.


3 posted on 02/23/2024 4:52:47 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

It’s a person.


4 posted on 02/23/2024 4:54:42 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

With a soul


5 posted on 02/23/2024 4:55:12 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
They are NOT viable in a frozen state

So we are now going to adopt the Left's definition of when life begins? "Viability"? None of us were "viable" for many months into the term of pregnancy, either.

6 posted on 02/23/2024 5:22:23 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Didn’t they used to burn witches in Alabama?


7 posted on 02/23/2024 5:39:46 PM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
They are NOT viable in a frozen state.

Yes they are, or they wouldn't store them.

Until they’re implanted and “accepted”, they are NOT beings...

Good heavens! This sounds like the same nonsensical argument made way back when by notoriously pro-abortion California Senator Barbara Boxer in her debate with Rick Santorum.

And if I remember correctly, many are destroyed all the time in the process.

Which makes it all the more immoral.

8 posted on 02/23/2024 5:40:57 PM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

You should examine your conscience


9 posted on 02/23/2024 5:44:41 PM PST by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Also...will Alabama eventually go after women that ovulate, but alas...the egg winds up as a spot on a sanitary napkin?

Is that murder?


10 posted on 02/23/2024 5:54:13 PM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

It isn’t immoral (IMO) to create frozen embryos as long as those embryos are used in an implantation attempt or adopted by organizations such as Snowflakes.


11 posted on 02/23/2024 5:55:26 PM PST by olivia3boys (t )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

Nope , that was Massachusetts.


12 posted on 02/23/2024 6:09:19 PM PST by RobertoinAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stanne

No


13 posted on 02/23/2024 6:13:37 PM PST by Reynoldo (BurnLootMurder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reynoldo

Yep


14 posted on 02/23/2024 6:16:37 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reynoldo

And then there’s this:

“ The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.”


15 posted on 02/23/2024 6:28:02 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

If you ban IVF there will be fewer children born.

Complicated situation, you have to weigh discarding embryos versus blocking a child from being born.


16 posted on 02/23/2024 7:57:14 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07
If you ban IVF there will be fewer children born.

How many fewer?

Not as few as human organisms being conceived to be destroyed...just a twist of fate which ones get to develop and be born or put down a sink drain unwanted.

Technology that advanced faster than our ethics.

17 posted on 02/23/2024 8:52:58 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: moovova
Also...will Alabama eventually go after women that ovulate, but alas...the egg winds up as a spot on a sanitary napkin? Is that murder?

Hillary - is that you?

18 posted on 02/23/2024 8:53:59 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

That’s a bad take. IVF is hard to defend once you learn more about it. It’s disappointing to see so many Republicans, even Trump, bending over backwards trying to condone this procedure, while Alabama gets it right.


19 posted on 02/25/2024 10:15:32 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

What The Ruling REALLY Was The Right Angel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VbMYBa7BBY


20 posted on 02/27/2024 3:22:17 PM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson