Posted on 02/18/2024 10:00:41 AM PST by Twotone
Most coverage of Friday's verdict from a Manhattan courthouse has focused on the $350 million plus that rogue judge Arthur F Engoron has demanded Trump cough up - for a "crime" which has no known victims and no identifiable proceeds. Confiscating (with interest) close to half-a-billion dollars for no good reason is certainly unusual, even by the standards of US "justice".
But that's not what caught my eye about Arthur F Wankeron's judgment. The truly striking passage was this (page 90, just before the sign-off):
The Court hereby enjoins Donald Trump and the Trump Organization and its affiliates from applying for loans from any financial institution chartered by or registered with the New York Department of Financial Services for a period of three years.
This struck a chord with me. As many of you know, a little over a week ago, the District of Columbia Superior Court ordered me to pay one million dollars in punitive damages to climate mullah Michael E Mann. So I'm currently living the dimestore version of Trump's travails.
Nobody seemed to think the former president had much chance of winning in this particular venue. So most of the commentary had airily assumed he'd be obliged to kick it upstairs to the appellate court, where he'll surely win. Several legal scholars said the same of my own case. For my own part, I was too focused on the trial to give much attention to what came next. But one hears so much breezy chit-chat in America about appealing this and appealing that that one takes one's appellate rights for granted.
(Excerpt) Read more at steynonline.com ...
What we have learned is that the legal system is weaponized. I guess that we found out how far the left are willing to go. But we are not done yet.
Forget all this...
I want to know when will dirty fani be back on the stand? That was the best entertainment I’ve seen in years...
“ And, by the way, this Trump fellow is what other countries call the Leader of the Opposition: we’re talking about the guy running against the ruling party in this year’s election. The “banana republic” jibes don’t capture the scale of what’s going on here - for what ramshackle basket-case in Latin America has ever had the need to confiscate half-a-billion from its political opponent and pass it off as “justice”? We are way beyond bananas here.”
She said she paid him her fair share...BS....That would have established her “price”. Now for the when...Yeh....they didn’t have sex for 2 years and suddenly...after he was hired...they did “it”.
Her conduct on the stand brought her an exit interview.
i do find the restriction on loans in NY concerning with regard to need to post sizeable bond for appeal, although i imagine DJT has other avenues. i wonder if that is the reasoning behind opening a GoFundMe.
“But one hears so much breezy chit-chat in America about appealing this and appealing that.....”
Especially on Free Republic. Along with let the crooks appoint our senators.
This is where I state: “I.M.H.O.,,,I would shrug and sigh, it is at this point I would not quibble if a few overactive poor citizens were to be affected by Mom Luna and exacted some kind of something or other upon thosr engaging in what some may term as lawfare, just to even things out for a day till the next masked lawfarer rides into toen.”
Yeah, we got to see how truly dumb and venal that stupid fat moron pig is on live TV. She was exactly what I expected.
Interesting. But, for me, the most dangerous aspect of this case against Trump is that a candidate for the elected office of District Attorney can campaign on targeting a political opponent in a partisan district, win election and then immediately pursue that individual with charges that name no victim, win before a corrupt judge and then confiscate financial penalties directed to the state while driving him out of business. This is Orwellian in the extreme.
It’s simple Power and Money - will always destroy it’s target or the Cartels would never survive. Our Gov. now operates like a Cartel.
A cartel is an association of similar companies or businesses (or governing bodies) that have grouped together in order to prevent competition and to control.
‘ESSENTIAL’ FEDERAL SPENDING BILL
....
The Treasury shall withhold payment of all money under current federal law to the State of New York and its political subdivisions and legislated entities and pay it instead to Donald J. Trump upon his application at any IRS office in the State of Florida until he has received $500 million.
Any payment he shall so receive shall be free of federal revenue imposition.
Are you talking in general terms, or about Steyn or President Trump? Neither has such a fund so far as I know. I bought a gift certificate from Steyn, which I will keep as a souvenir, but that's as far as he has gone. Trump???
Trump - and there is already a GoFundMe - but they have a tendency to close accounts down if they are unsympathetic towards the receipient.
There are more crooks under the direction of universal suffrage than in State legislatures. At least I can round up a posse and raise Cain at the private residence of my State Legislatures then vote them out or intimidate them to direct their vote based on why they were elected in the first place; can’t do that with drunks under the overpass that get paid to vote at homeless shelters, canvassers who fill in ballots at nursing homes of those who have Alzheimer’s, one issue voters who want to murder their unborn offspring at will, too many of them. 17th Amendment is the antithesis of an ingredient for a republican form of government (State representation).
Mark makes the same incorrect claim that I have seen several others make on this site—that in order to appeal, one must first post a bond.
This simply is not true. Every one is entitled to appeal, whether you post a bond or not.
Where the bond comes into play is in addressing whether you can stay (postpone) the enforcement of the judgment while the appeal is going on. If you post a bond, you can. If you don’t post a bond, then the other side can act to enforce the judgment during the pendency of the appeal. If you win the appeal, you can get a court order requiring the plaintiff to disgorge any amounts collected.
Now, for Mark, allowing Mann to collect pending appeal may be extremely disruptive to his practice and business.
Given the unique circumstances of Mark’s case, where the punitive damages awarded are so disproportional to the actual damages (and hence so facially unconstitutional), Mark should apply (first to the trial court and then to the appellate court) for an order either eliminating, or at least substantially reducing, the amount of the bond he is required to post.
I’ll be darned! Yes, one has been started for President Trump’s legal fees. I will keep a sharp eye out because it may well not be sanctioned by him and may be short lived.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.