Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barbra Streisand Defends Fani Willis: ‘A Woman Is Allowed to Have a Private Life’
Breitbart ^ | 02/17/2024 | David NG

Posted on 02/17/2024 8:38:55 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

Hollywood star Barbra Streisand has found her next big role: defense attorney for Fulton County district attorney Fanni Willis.

Barbra Streisand has argued her case for the embattled Fani Willis, who is on trial in Georgia for her alleged ethical violations in the prosecution of former President Donald Trump and 18 other co-defendants.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fanipack; life; private; streisand; willis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

And in some cases, an IQ of 40.


41 posted on 02/17/2024 9:04:23 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Precisely the problem with Clinton and Monica: He used the public sphere to cover up his private life. You can claim the right to privacy all you want, but not when you are using the public to aggrandize you or buffer you from scrutiny. It’s pretty So its pretty simple Babs: She made her private life the public’s business.


42 posted on 02/17/2024 9:04:52 AM PST by Free Louie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“Stop sticking your nose into things you don’t understand babs.”

I see what you did there.


43 posted on 02/17/2024 9:05:19 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The left has these stupid “celebrities” at the ready for when they are caught with their pants down. (Ha)

BS probably got a call from the Biden regime to tell her what stupid, moronic thing to say. She wouldn’t be commenting if there were no Trump connection.


44 posted on 02/17/2024 9:06:35 AM PST by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

that hag is STILL alive?


45 posted on 02/17/2024 9:08:24 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Right up until you use your personal life to defraud the public treasury. But ghetto and Hollywood is as ghetto and Hollywood does.


46 posted on 02/17/2024 9:09:46 AM PST by txeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

True...but a woman is not allowed to lie when under oath. And a lawyer should be particularly aware of that.


47 posted on 02/17/2024 9:10:39 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Private life is one thing, but when you hire someone in Georgia State government or Fulton County Ga government you are required to disclose any relationship you have with the person hired, whether by blood or otherwise. When there is a relationship, the hire has to go through additional clearance. She lied to avoid that process.

Not to mention, she personally gained from paying him over $650,000 because he turned around and spent thousands of it on her.


48 posted on 02/17/2024 9:12:08 AM PST by clashfan (Whom shall I fear?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Who is the one on the left?


49 posted on 02/17/2024 9:14:47 AM PST by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Every time I see a pistol grip I'm reminded of Babs for some reason....


50 posted on 02/17/2024 9:14:53 AM PST by Manic_Episode (A government of the government, by the government, for the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

These folks are not very good at this. Its either gaslighting or ignorance. They are allowed to have a private life, it just cant be paid for by the taxpayer.


51 posted on 02/17/2024 9:14:59 AM PST by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Well I guess if Fani Willis can be a prosecutor, Barbra Streisand can be a defense counselor.


52 posted on 02/17/2024 9:17:52 AM PST by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

No doubt this Hollywood creep would say the same thing if it was a white DA going after a rat ex President…right?


53 posted on 02/17/2024 9:18:17 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

MOST STATE/COUNTY rules are very clear about relationships between employees.

THIS ONE IS PARTICULARLY OUTLANDISH Due to who could hire/fire who.

She obviously OVER PAID HIM...


54 posted on 02/17/2024 9:18:47 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
One would be mistaken if they thought Barbara Streisand would hire a handler to tell her to keep her mouth shut. This is the woman who single-handedly exposed how attempts to silence, suppress, or censor something can backfire, an affect aptly named 'The Streisand Effect'

A picture of her home in 2003 was part of a public collection of images displaying coastal erosion. She sued sued the photographer for $50 million for invasion of privacy. ("Laws for thee but not for me.")

Ironically, the attention surrounding the lawsuit made the photo of her house go viral. In the month before the lawsuit, the picture had been downloaded a half-dozen times, including twice by her lawyers, whereas the image was downloaded more than 420,000 times during the month following the lawsuit.

55 posted on 02/17/2024 9:19:08 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
"Barbra Streisand Defends Fani Willis: ‘A Woman Is Allowed to Have a Private Life’"

Not at public expense.


56 posted on 02/17/2024 9:19:21 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Listen, you ugly twit. I suggest you go live is some European Hellhole taken over by Islamo-f**k thugs, and see how you like it.


57 posted on 02/17/2024 9:20:16 AM PST by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This is a lawyer’s analysis of the “affair.” (Hilarious.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlhXDknUGcE


58 posted on 02/17/2024 9:20:27 AM PST by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

FROM what I have learned-—he also did NOT have the kind of background (RICO) that this case was supposed to require.


59 posted on 02/17/2024 9:20:43 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

IT USED TO BE CALLED:

“DO NOT DIP YOUR PEN INTO THE COMPANY INK”


60 posted on 02/17/2024 9:22:00 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson