Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Shoots Down 24 Houthi Drones And Missiles In Biggest Attack So Far
Daily Caller ^ | January 09, 2024 9:25 PM ET | MICAELA BURROW - INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, DEFENSE

Posted on 01/10/2024 2:06:34 AM PST by Red Badger

U.S. destroyers shot down 24 drones and missiles fired by the Iran-backed Houthi rebels, constituting the largest attack on commercial shipping in the Red Sea since tensions escalated in October, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed Tuesday.

The Department of Defense is operating a panoply of naval assets in the region as part of Operation Prosperity Guardian, a U.S.-led coalition to defend critical waterways from repeated threats by the Houthis. Three guided-missile destroyers, the USS Mason, USS Gravely and USS Laboon, and F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jets from the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower aircraft carrier engaged the mix of drones and missiles fired Tuesday, CENTCOM said in a statement.

An initial assessment showed no damage or injuries to either the U.S. warships engaged in the firefight or any of the dozens of commercial vessels in the vicinity, according to CENTCOM.

The U.S. intercepted 18 Iranian-made one-way attack drones, two anti-ship cruise missiles and one anti-ship ballistic missile in a combined effort at around 9:15 p.m. local time, the statement added.

CENTCOM reiterated a Jan. 3 warning from the U.S. and partners against the Houthis launching further attacks. “The Houthis will bear the responsibility for the consequences should they continue to threaten lives, the global economy, or the free flow of commerce in the region’s critical waterways,” the statement said.

Over the weekend, the Laboon shot down a single explosive-laden drone in “self-defense,” CENTCOM said. It was the first time the military had characterized an engagement as taking place in self- defense, although it has said that previous one-way attack drones were inbound before the warships neutralized them.

Prior to Tuesday, the largest single onslaught took place on Dec. 16, when the USS Carney shot down 14 attack drones that came at the destroyer in a wave without any sign of commercial vessels nearby.

U.S. military assets in the Red Sea now include 130 aircraft and the vessels assigned to the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group, carrying about 4,000 sailors and Marines, White House national security spokesperson John Kirby said at a briefing Wednesday.

“As the president has made clear, the United States does not seek conflict with any nation or actor in the Middle East, nor do we want to see the war between Israel and Hamas widen in the region,” Kirby said. “But neither will we shrink from the task of defending ourselves, our interests, our partners, or the free flow of international commerce.”

Members of Congress have raised concerns in recent days over Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s unannounced hospitalization, during which top national security leaders and the president were unaware he had been hospitalized for at least three days. While Austin’s deputy performed some routine operational duties, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle worried the apparent breakdown in chain of command could hinder the U.S.’ ability to respond to global tensions.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Iran; Politics/Elections; War on Terror; Yemen
KEYWORDS: drones; iran; redsea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2024 2:06:34 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If these are the same missiles that Russia is using.... No wonder they’re losing.


2 posted on 01/10/2024 2:22:19 AM PST by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wonder how much each missle costs? Raytheon has got to be loving this .....


3 posted on 01/10/2024 2:32:47 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
...and one anti-ship ballistic missile...
Fired at a moving target?
4 posted on 01/10/2024 3:02:18 AM PST by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

They need to Target the launch sites and the host of terrorism, Iran.
Wasting all that missle cash just to hammer drones is simply not cost effective.


5 posted on 01/10/2024 3:29:04 AM PST by himno hero (had'nff 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jerod

Shouldn’t we be sending some ordinance. Back to them.


6 posted on 01/10/2024 3:49:41 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So will Biden figure out how to send Iran more money which will be used to improve the terrorist proxies?


7 posted on 01/10/2024 3:51:33 AM PST by Ex-Episcopalian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
"Fired at a moving target?

Ballistic missile refers to its trajectory, not its guidance system.

8 posted on 01/10/2024 4:04:55 AM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

I am assuming that the author is using the wrong term and actually means anti-ship missile, which has to be programmed before launch and generally uses radar to home in on its target.


9 posted on 01/10/2024 4:05:15 AM PST by kg_mobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Yes, I know. Must be a short time in flight, though.


10 posted on 01/10/2024 4:07:44 AM PST by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
US taxpayers should not be bearing the cost to defend foreign flagged vessels.
That said, if our ships are actually being targeted, why aren't we bombing the terrorists out of existence?
11 posted on 01/10/2024 4:15:19 AM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“The Houthis will bear the responsibility for the consequences should they continue to threaten lives, the global economy, or the free flow of commerce in the region’s critical waterways,”

Idel threats from this administration, These Houthis and the Blowfish should have been tracked down and destroyed months ago.


12 posted on 01/10/2024 4:17:32 AM PST by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
US taxpayers should not be bearing the cost to defend foreign flagged vessels.

I would have hoped that this sentiment would be unanimous on this website. I honestly think one would have to be retarded to disagree with it.

13 posted on 01/10/2024 4:26:37 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

US Military = World Police


14 posted on 01/10/2024 4:30:16 AM PST by The Louiswu (Pray for Peace in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Damn.. based on that picture they’re shooting drone boats with a 50.. last resort I would think.

CWIS systems were upgraded to “block ib” variants which added surface protection vice just air threats only using that along with the SeaRAM would be far more effective than a 50.


15 posted on 01/10/2024 4:57:22 AM PST by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Why aren’t we bombing the launch sites? No way we don’t know within a few meters the locations.


16 posted on 01/10/2024 5:00:51 AM PST by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Feckless

The U.S. has no legal or diplomatic justification to engage in military action to protect foreign commercial shipping in international waters. This whole mission has been a disaster from the start.


17 posted on 01/10/2024 5:07:01 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jerod

They aren’t.


18 posted on 01/10/2024 5:14:01 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

They aren’t. Raytheon can’t get the chips needed to build replacement missiles. They’ve bitterly complained about that. It’s not that they don’t *want* to make a ton of money off it, it’s just that they *can’t*.


19 posted on 01/10/2024 5:14:53 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

ASBMs are now a thing, and yes, they do work against a moving target.


20 posted on 01/10/2024 5:15:15 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson