Posted on 12/10/2023 2:44:12 PM PST by marcusmaximus
Hamas on Sunday threatened to kill all of its remaining hostages if demands such as more aid for Gaza and prisoner exchanges were not met, after suffering repeated losses in its battle with Israel.
The Palestinian terror group is still holding the bodies of 20 hostages who died in captivity, Israel said over the weekend.
Abu Obeida, a spokesman for Hamas’ armed wing, claimed Sunday that not another single kidnap victim will leave Gaza alive unless Israel agrees to all its demands in negotiations that broke down at the start of December. At least some of those demands have been for more aid for Gaza residents and the freeing of Palestinian prisoners.
“Neither the fascist enemy and its arrogant leadership… nor its supporters… can take their prisoners alive without an exchange and negotiation and meeting the demands of the resistance,” Obeida said in a televised broadcast.
The ultimatum came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said that of the 137 hostages believed to still be in Hamas custody, 20 are dead.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Yep, sounds like they just gave Israel the green light to go thermonuclear against Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and Syria if that’s what they do.
If they kill all the hostages, they lose world support, and anything that happens to Gzaz is on the heads of the Hamas.
They are ONLY saying this because most likely the hostages are already dead..otherwise they would be calling for another “truce” to exchange hostages for prisoners
I'll give Hamas this little bit of credit. They don't say "...most of them women and children, LGBTQs and persons of color, according to...
The rubble could be bulldozed into the Med to make a nice coral reef for tourists to explore from the new Gaza resorts.
Hamas gonna Hamas….
No comment from the UN, Harvard or MIT?
Im afraid so.
Hamas days are numbered.
They can never let the female hostages go, because they will tell how they have been mistreated.
They're not talking to Israel. There talking to the media and libs so they'll put the pressure on the IDF to let up.
They know better than to kill their only bargaining chips.
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
— Barack Hussein Obama
That’s a death threat that piece of sh— gave. If the future does not belong to someone, what does that mean? It means they are dead, they have no future. So what he is saying is “Death to those who slander the prophet of Islam” One of the worst things to ever happen to this country is putting that punk ass bastard into office with his “fundemental transformation”. He just may very well have destroyed this country for good.
Hate to write this. They are probably already dead.
Agree.
And there it is. They are very likely already dead, anyway.
IDF, Shin Bet, here's your next target.
True.
When the IDF carefully avoids incidents that kill bystanders and human shields at the cost of Israeli lives, it gets no respect or rewards from the UN, the media and the Left. Still “occupiers” “slaveholders” and perpetrators of “genocide.” All untrue.
Once the last hostages are accounted for, sadly meaning many dead, then no holds barred is justified.
Did Hamas gently treat the reported 1,200 Israelis who were killed at the start of the October 7th unprovoked invasion of homes and offices in Israel during the Sabbath? No. Some children were deliberately made to watch their parents maimed, burned, raped and then murdered.
— Barack Hussein Obama
Slander is unnecessary, the truth will do.
It is Islamic Law to rape captured women. Here is Ali Sina with a quote from the Hadith of Bukhari.
From Ali Sina’s book “Understanding Muhammad”.
p. 39 Rape
Muhammad allowed his men to rape the women captured in raids. However Muslims faced a dilemma. They wanted to have sex with their female captives, but also wanted to return them for ransom and therefore did not want to make them pregnant. Some of these women were already married whose husbands had escaped when taken by surprise and were still alive. The raiders considered the possibility of “coitus interruptus” (withdrawing from intercourse before ejaculation). Unsure of the best course of action, they sought the counsel of their Prophet. Buhkari reports:
Abu Saeed said “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said “How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said “It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exists, it will exist.
Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459.
Muhammed did not forbid raping the captive women. Instead he made an asinine claim that when Allah intends to create someone, nothing can prevent it. He told his men that coitus interruptus is ill-advised because it would be an attempt to thwart the will of Allah. He did not say a word against the rape of the captives, and by discouraging coitus interruptus, he supported forced insemination.
He made even his god legitimize intercourse with women captured in wars, the so-called “right hand possessions,” even if they were married before their capture.
Hamas, thinking that they are holding the high cards.
What a pity.
Wipe Hamas out of existence, every last one of them and Hezbollah too.
It is time to clean the crap off the face of the earth.
Why do civilized people deal with Islam? We are considered “infidel,” non people.
Let’s show them the door to Hell and the Devil!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.