Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vg0va3
It was in the article:

Kevin Wallace, a lawyer from Letitia James’s office hit back at the defense lawyer.

“I think the idea that you can’t lie to a bank is pretty well established,” Wallace said.

Judge Arthur Engoron sided with the attorney in Letitia James’ office and said, “that the mere fact that lenders were happy doesn’t mean that the statute wasn’t violated.”
6 posted on 11/29/2023 8:13:27 PM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: chaosagent
"I think the idea that you can't lie to a bank is pretty well established," Wallace said.

Except the bank executive described this as a "difference of opinion" and not a lie, you jackass (Wallace).

8 posted on 11/29/2023 8:17:51 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: chaosagent

a difference in fmv is not a lie

not all appraisers come up with the same number


9 posted on 11/29/2023 8:18:16 PM PST by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: chaosagent
Judge Arthur Engoron sided with the attorney in Letitia James’ office and said, “that the mere fact that lenders were happy doesn’t mean that the statute wasn’t violated.”

I’ve never heard of a judge constantly giving his own extremely biased opinion against a defendant DURING a trial. Of course, this isn’t a trial, it’s a circus and the “judge” is the head clown. If they actually convict Trump of this absurd and imaginary “crime”, and if (big if) there’s even the tiniest shred of integrity at the appellate level in New York, such a decision should be reversed in a nanosecond due to this “judge”’s outrageous antics.

But I know that these leftist vermin don’t care in the least if what they are doing is legal, or even if it is eventually overturned. All they care about is using a show trial to fling mud at Trump in an election year. Whether their accusations are true is unimportant to them. I don’t know what more it is going to take to finally rouse the “silent majority” from their paralysis and get them to finally admit that we are at the point of no return here if we don’t immediately take every possible action to defeat and destroy these tyrants. We have literal show trials and political prisoners in this country now, and yet most “conservatives” sit idly by and watch it all burn down because they don’t want to be seen as doing anything “radical.” Do they seriously think it will all somehow get better on its own? 1776 was a picnic compared to what it will take to get our country back now, but the sooner people turn off their TVs and admit the dire situation we’re in, the sooner the necessary kinetic action can take place. Talking and “voting” ain’t gonna do it.

These evil monsters are openly lawless and defiant now, and have rigged every system to prevent that approach from dislodging them. Even if Trump miraculously survives the Category 5 hurricane of vote fraud that we all know is coming and wins, it is now crystal clear that the tyrannical Left will not abide by any legal or Constitutional actions that he attempts to take. The Left is at war with us now, and the sooner we acknowledge that and respond accordingly, the sooner we can begin to take out the trash.

30 posted on 11/30/2023 12:12:41 AM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: chaosagent

Judge Engoron is PURE EVIL and needs an EXORCISM by his RABBI!


38 posted on 11/30/2023 2:54:34 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: chaosagent

Ahh. Thanks. They put that entire backstory in the article and hid the payoff. What garbage writing. I enjoy GP. But their article formats stink.

Btw. If the state believes that statute was violated then the state should have filed criminal charges. Not civil. What standing does the state have in this transaction?

Civil court is so those that are harmed have a venue to seek relief because they do not have the authority to file criminal charges and extract damages like the state.


48 posted on 11/30/2023 5:00:48 AM PST by vg0va3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: chaosagent

“I think the idea that you can’t lie to a bank is pretty well established,” Wallace said.

I think the idea that these prosecutors do like is pretty well established.


52 posted on 11/30/2023 5:39:02 AM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson