paywall free link:
The Most Expensive Judicial Race in US History Is Raising Questions
Sounds a lot like the strange donation patterns that James O’Keefe uncovered on the East Coast about a year ago. Tons of small “contributions” from people who didn’t know they had “contributed.”
The Obama 2008 campaign had similar large numbers of small donations that were for odd amounts, leading many to think they were foreign donations that underwent a currency conversion, say from Euros to USDs.
The lameystream media and politicians love money. Neither politicians or lamestream media care where the money comes from. When the money spent is more than what the job pays …. corruption is guaranteed and what media sources are going to work to find the money sources when doing such would guarantee the money sources to the media would dry up. We each (you and I) understand the facts yet (you and I) lack the solutions or do we lack the solutions but to have a microphone means submitting to the corruption ? Money wins most every time is spent imho
Janet C. Protasiewicz <—- This witch is poisonous.
Just more proof our government and “Justice” systems are all bought and paid for by those who would rule us all....
When the person with the most money wins makes one wonder about the voters? Idiot, moronic, ignorant, nefarious?
Basically the same thing Obama did with illegal foreign donations in his 2008 election.
At some point here soon, people are going to lose respect for “judges”.
Let me guess. Janet is queer?
Even if Wisconsin Ethics Commission determined that the dems cheated, even if that evolved into a lawsuit and the good guys won, what would the punishment be?
I think what is going on is this:
1. Money that is recycled US Tax dollars, put through various outsources, and brought back into accounts. State Department, CIA, FBI, ect. then to foreign corporations for ‘aid’ then back to other corporations and finally to DNC associated entities.
2. The DNC entities need a way to recycle it into campaigns, without triggering investigations, so they need ‘donors’. The money is then processed to ‘donors’ go give daily in small amounts not to trigger investigations. You can’t have to many ‘donors’ as someone might notice that they are giving money when they have not and complain, so they have to limit the ‘numbers of donors’ some.
With the above scheme, it’s only a problem if people check the donor lists by computer. Please note, if this theory is true, then it’s not only interstate organized crime and election fraud, it’s international. You will notice that the Federal Government itself would be involved.....and you can certainly count on the FBI and Federal Government to investigate it, right?
ROFLOL. Nothing is going to happen even if the scenario I just put out was 100% true.
No doubt in my Military Mind that ‘Judge Janet’ was bought and foisted upon us with outside money, as was Tammy Baldwin (D, Lesbian) a decade ago.
Not sure WHY we’re such an easy mark. Too polite, I guess. *SPIT*
However - the Republican candidate running against Judge Janet was a piece of work. I voted for him, but I did NOT like him. Ugh!