The Most Expensive Judicial Race in US History Is Raising Questions

Epoch Times ^ | 10/21/23 | Steven Kovac

[CFW]

Under the microscope are multiple small donations from voters who say they didn't make such donations to Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz.

In the most expensive state judicial race in U.S. history, Janet C. Protasiewicz, a liberal, defeated conservative attorney Dan Kelly in April for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

The record $23 million raised by or on behalf of the Janet for Justice campaign prompted a group of citizen investigators in Wisconsin to look into where all of the money had come from.

Election Watch, an election integrity watchdog group, has now asked the Wisconsin Ethics Commission to investigate campaign contributions made to Ms. Protasiewicz.

The complaint is based on a computer analysis of state and federal databases conducted by Election Watch.

The filing against Justice Protasiewicz is part of a broader nationwide investigation into how both Democrats and Republicans benefit from lax campaign finance rules that may result in violations of contribution limits.

Peter Bernegger, a data analyst with Election Watch, which filed the complaint, told The Epoch Times that the group’s research found that the Protasiewicz campaign has received a myriad of repetitive small contributions purportedly from the same individuals totaling at least $6 million.

[Pete Dovgan]

I think what is going on is this:

1. Money that is recycled US Tax dollars, put through various outsources, and brought back into accounts. State Department, CIA, FBI, ect. then to foreign corporations for ‘aid’ then back to other corporations and finally to DNC associated entities.

2. The DNC entities need a way to recycle it into campaigns, without triggering investigations, so they need ‘donors’. The money is then processed to ‘donors’ go give daily in small amounts not to trigger investigations. You can’t have to many ‘donors’ as someone might notice that they are giving money when they have not and complain, so they have to limit the ‘numbers of donors’ some.

With the above scheme, it’s only a problem if people check the donor lists by computer. Please note, if this theory is true, then it’s not only interstate organized crime and election fraud, it’s international. You will notice that the Federal Government itself would be involved.....and you can certainly count on the FBI and Federal Government to investigate it, right?

ROFLOL. Nothing is going to happen even if the scenario I just put out was 100% true.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

No doubt in my Military Mind that ‘Judge Janet’ was bought and foisted upon us with outside money, as was Tammy Baldwin (D, Lesbian) a decade ago.

Not sure WHY we’re such an easy mark. Too polite, I guess. *SPIT*

However - the Republican candidate running against Judge Janet was a piece of work. I voted for him, but I did NOT like him. Ugh!