[Sacajaweau]

she lost by 17,000 votes....moot....

[CFW]

“she lost by 17,000 votes....moot....”

—

That is probably what the Court will decide, but her appeal states “over 8,000”, so the alleged number itself should not be an issue. The Court will probably rule the winner has been certified and thus they can’t interfere with the State’s election process and its verification of the winner.

It matters not that the left uses those types of rulings to lock in their cheating as they know that all they have to do is pretty much get the media to declare their candidate the winner (as was done in the 2020 Arizona Presidential election when barely 50% of the votes had been counted). They can create the actual ballots in the following days.

[AndyTheBear]

"Moot" would be if the total was known to be less than 17,000 right?

But since when is "up to 8000" known to be less than 17,000?

[gibsonguy]

The real cheat here was that thieving bitch Hobbs sabotaged the machines in Republican precincts on Election Day. They were down for hours and a rat judge refused to extend the hours so the thousands who had to leave couldn’t come back later and vote l was in AZ that day and it was a hell of lot more than 17,000

[Fresh Wind]

she lost by 17,000 votes

That's only what the official vote count tells you. If you believe that, you probably also believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.