It might be that Trump never showed those documents to the writer.
“That's a damning piece of evidence," Dershowitz said.
Maybe. But as I understand it - Jack Smith does not have that document. Therefore he has Jack Shit.
Lawyer opinions don’t mean much in this day and age of forgiven lawlessness of one side and persecution of the other.
Trump needs a speedy trial, followed by the forced withdrawal of these indictments or a speedy acquittal. The longer it’s drawn out, the worse it will be.
“That's a damning piece of evidence," Dershowitz said.
DJT's next thought after alleged recording was saying, to himself, three times, the words:
"I declassify this document.
I declassify this document.
I declassify this document."
And, poof! Document is de-classified.
“Hey, I had the right to have that piece of information because the Records Act permits me to have it.”
President Trump will easily be able to explain that in court.
Oy, such a barimer this one.
The Judge at the hearing tomorrow should rule the indictments as null and void. That would save the Country a great deal of strife that will develop from these charges. According to Professor Dershowitz the charges are groundless anyway since Federal Law overrules Smith’s charges..
“...and then the investigation produces some evidence of crime”
Hmmm, last time I checked, our 4A requires there to be evidence of a crime prior to an investigation. It should be thrown out on that alone.
I had the right to have that piece of information because the Records Act permits me to have it.
Weak or strong a fact can’t be denied.
Jack Smith is wrong when he says there’s one set of laws. He was assigned only one job: to get Trump.
The puppet masters gave Biden to much slack now it’s ass eating time on them.
Matthew Whitaker was the only U.S. AG, IMHO.