Posted on 05/25/2023 8:14:44 AM PDT by Jacquerie
The Durham report refuted the narrative of former President Donald Trump colluding with Russia to win the 2016 Election for good. Now, Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) seeks to charge former House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) a $16 million fine for continuing to propagate the narrative.
Why $16 million? Rep. Luna stated this was approximately half the cost of the federal investigation, therefore suggesting Rep. Schiff owes much culpability in pushing the Trump-Russia collusion story.
"The GOP Conference agrees that Adam Schiff has betrayed the trust of the American people, purposely abused positions of extreme authority, lied continuously, and as such, must be held to account. Accordingly, the resolution requires Rep. Schiff to pay a $16 million fine, half of the cost American taxpayers were forced to pay for the Russia hoax investigation," Luna told Fox News.
Luna had also filed a motion to have Schiff expelled from Congress, stating he was "a dishonor to the House of Representatives" and "unfit for office."
Schiff continued making himself the hero, claiming he "stood up to Donald Trump and held extreme MAGA forces accountable," adding, "They'll go after anyone who defends the rule of law."
(Excerpt) Read more at floridianpress.com ...
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving guy.
Yay Baby!!
Love it, he is very deserving.
She’s my cogresswoman.
She’s great!!!
Schiff is a lying sleaze bag who deserves a lot more for blatantly lying to the public and everyone else. He should be kicked out of congress and fined much more than $16M.
Bugsy Schiff
He shouldn’t be
I agree. She is a mongoose among a den of snakes, and I would love to see her dispatch Schiff. I watched her on Gutfeld last night and thought she was lovely.
He will be out of the HOR soon enough anyway. And in the Senate. :-(
That said, I support her.
You all know the 16 mil is all taxpayer monies in the first place.
Hold hearings and put Schiff under oath. Compare the facts with his lies.
Great idea.
That is a drop in the bucket for what he did to this country for 4 years.
Purple district. She needs to pick fights with outsiders outside her state.
This Adam Shifty Shift.....Where the Standard Hotel,,,famed for having barrels of acid on the property by the local Fire Department and the mysterious crash of a helicopter that killed the manager.
Hi Shifty Schiff......what about the Liddle children ?
The 'Liddle Kidz Foundation' has had several training workshops within Adam Schiff's 28th district of California, I've also seen the two share an address, though I can't verify, I'll still leave those pictures down below... Again, note the spelling! Tina Allen the founder of 'Liddle Kidz' has a long history of working in the Hollywood area, as does Adam Schiff.
The organization is a global non-profit offering 'internationally accredited' pediatric and infant massage certifications.
http://www.liddlekidz.com Check it out, yourself, you can't make this up. I don't know about you guys but this whole idea seems a bit fishy and crazy to me..
Images: https://steemitimages.com/p/4qEixipsxSf1sSorKgZ3xNtxFtedRFwvsjGMsmRm2sUEARHS7o7qxEatoP3LMax5kr?format=match&mode=fit&width=640
and https://steemitimages.com/p/4qEixipsxSf1sSorKgZ3xNtxFtedRFwvuFRNCh3EhYygeekxLAhEnsbK99XPgPAige?format=match&mode=fit&width=640
Web site only takes FL zip codes.
"Treason," by a non-US Constitutional definition, has arguably been committed by many on the left in the process of fixing the past few election cycles. The Framers were obviously quite concerned by British overuse of that charge for political behavior, placing strict limits thereon. Some skilled legal historian and writer on the right needs to review why the Framers were so concerned and just what kind of misbehavior qualified for the Framer's concept of "Treason." Also should review the Framers' concept of what kind of political behaviors, although short of treason, should be considered illegal and how they would have charged them. A similar review of the 14th's intended meaning of "insurrection or rebellion against" [the US Constitution] would be nice. It's not written as if events of the Civil War were the only possible trigger of that clause. The left would love to apply it to Trump and everyone who opposes the left. I'd love to use it to rip a bunch of anti-americans from office, but unlike the the left I want to first make sure they fit the intent of the 14th's Framers. Whereas the J6 folks mostly fit the intent of the 1st rather than the 14th.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.