FBI dropped 4 probes into Hillary Clinton, family’s non-profit ahead of 2016 election: Durham report

NYPost ^ | 5/18/23 | Katherine Donlevy

[CFW]

The FBI had at least four open criminal investigations into Hillary and Bill Clinton that were suddenly dropped in the months before the 2016 presidential election, special counsel John Durham’s recently released report shows.

The bombshell report released by Durham — which concluded that the bureau’s probe into former President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia was “seriously flawed” — also shed light on the quashed probes.

The feds had been looking into claims that foreign countries and other individuals were trying to influence the Clintons through donations to their namesake non-profit and Hillary’s presidential campaign.

Three of the FBI’s four investigations that were launched in early 2016 were looking into allegations that the Clinton Foundation has a hub of “criminal activity.”

[CFW]

The corporate mocking-bird media's continued habit of turning a blind eye to the vile corruption by the Clinton's is almost amazing to watch. When you think of the fact that they are the ones who created the Russia/Trump collusion story, and the way the media ignore that one part of the story all in unison, you have to wonder exactly how many "files" the Clintons hold on those in the media.

[AnthonySoprano]

.
They also raided a Whistleblower on the Clinton Foundation and took his evidence.

.

[AnthonySoprano]

This one Text - from an FBi Agent immediately after questioning Hillary’s IT guy, tells the entire story. This Text was known and Sessions didn’t care. Rosenstein didn’t care. Huber didn’t care. Mueller didn’t care. Horowitz didn’t care. Weismann didn’t care. Barr didn’t care.


It immediately tells any Lawyer, Investigator, or Prosecutor that they were 100% covering for Hillary. Feds pressure and flip and they let this guy get away without hitting him with a dozen felonies and making him their Star Witness.

[cabojoe]

Anybody heard from Hillary lately? She’s probably too busy baking cookies or hiking in the forest to comment...

[nopardons]

BTTT

[Beowulf9]

So what is it? Money? That list she’s got going out there? She knows where the bodies are buried? What?

[linMcHlp]

bttt

[4Liberty]

Obama

[magua]

I didn’t make this up, but it’s worth repeating. At the rate, the only ones not involved in the Russia/Trump collusion were Russia and Trump.

[Robert A Cook PE]

So what is it? Money? That list she's got going out there? She knows where the bodies are buried? What?

800 FBI files she received for blackmailing people in the mid-1990’s.

[sauropod]

Drinking that box brand chardonnay....

[lowbridge]

“The feds had been looking into claims that foreign countries and other individuals were trying to influence the Clintons”

What took them so long anyways?

An all-but-forgotten episode from her husband’s time in office offers an ugly real-world illustration of what money can buy, and the Clintons’ role in peddling cash for favors. It involves a California businessman, Johnny Chung, who, back when big “soft money” checks could flow straight to parties, gave $366,000 to the Democratic National Committee.

Chung, who eventually pleaded guilty to tax evasion and election law violations, used the donations to arrange visits to the White House, at least 49 times in two years. As a Senate investigation found, “Chung was granted extraordinary access to the White House, and especially the first lady’s office.”

Although a National Security Council staffer considered Chung a “hustler,” Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, Maggie Williams, accepted his $50,000 check in her White House office — immediately after Chung brought a delegation of Chinese clients for lunch at the White House mess, a tour of the White House and a photo with Hillary Clinton in the Map Room.

This welcoming embrace did not simply reflect the first lady’s raising money for the team; as the Senate report relates, a Hillary Clinton aide told Chung that “the first lady had some debts with the DNC” to pay for holiday parties.

“I see the White House is like a subway,” Chung told the Los Angeles Times in 1997. “You have to put in coins to open the gates.’’ It’s fair to recall: Hillary Clinton stood on the other side of the turnstile.

https://www.goerie.com/story/opinion/columns/2016/02/11/clinton-sanders-both-have-money/25053141007/

[Ann Archy]

Democrats are LAW-LESS because Republicans are BALL-LESS!!

[nesnah]

I have opined before, with regard to the famous 900 Fib files pilfered by Craig Livingstone and delivered to the Clintons, were actually internal FiB personnel files, not files on political enemies as we would all assume.

They needed to know who was friendly and get them into positions where they could ‘help’ in the future.

[Texas resident]

Hillary had 900+ raw data FBI files back in the 90’s. She still uses that as leverage to get what she wants.
That is probably why the head of the fbi said that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute the accusations against her. Plus they all remember what happened to Vince Foster.

[From The Deer Stand]

We all know Hillary is an evil crook. We all know she broke the law intentionally. We all know she is protected and will never be charged. We all know somebody is above the law.

[popdonnelly]

The FBI is totally partisan and corrupt, and Democratic members of Congress love it that way.

[JoJo354]

I’d rather the info get out there and get it over with so I’d be free of the Clintons and their non-stop corruption. It’s like pulling off a band-aid. If all the people the Clintons have info on were to stand up and walk away from them and say “Go for it!”, maybe this country would get back to normal.

[protoconservative]

At some point we got to put the concert cap on feelings and lost inditement opportunities around the Clinton Global Initiative and learn the methodologies that are used by the same players around many organizations today. The same players are much more exposed by 2023 donations from China and Russia alliance, and exposing that cashflow has significant public costs to the maze of DNC/DNC PAC donation flows.

Using more than half a dozen non for profits to launder donations from public reporting unacceptable China, Saudi, Ukraine or Russia linked to from the Clintons PAC is the lesson to be learned. Sitting on the other side, we always wondered how they extracted so much from the public sector employees and AFL-CIO crowd, well they dont. For american donors the liberal causes are cheap and little is expected in return. Even the outward appearance of alliance is no longer expected because the costs are so low. On the other hand foreign largeness is “illegal” and the expression of being under control should be hidden except in “judgement” calls of Department of State halls of power. The liberal fund raising machine is not based on extracting union dues from US citizens, it is based on collecting payoffs for political favors not for US citizens and routing them into election campaigns with a commission taken at every step.

The projection that republicans must be dinging something will foreign powers is telling. The last republican senator who felt they owed something to a foreign power like china or Russia is burred deep at this point. The trade war against chinar aligned a resistance that never existed a decade ago. The crowd who resists foreign influences has a message to run on, the press wrongly places that as some sort of isolationism, the clean from foreign money need to use it to win on both sides of the isle.

[Fireone]

Well, at least the Awan brothers are serving their time in prison...oh, wait! (they were allowed to flee the USA, by the USA.)