We just won a 50-year battle, and she's wringing her hands.
What about the children, Nancy?
Back in 1973, a handful of guys in black robes decided Roe v Wade.
For the Left, that was a victory for “our democracy” and they love it.
After Dobbs, voters in each of the individual states can elect state legislators who will then vote as a body on state-level laws to determine local legality of abortion.
For the Left, this is fascism.
And RINOs think that voters don’t like it when voters have political power — and those voters will use their political power to punish the party that gave them political power on this issue.
Republicans: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory since 1992.
I fear God only, no one else. It is so sad that people do not realize what is going to happen when God decides He’s had enough of all of this: Rampant immorality, abortion, rampant sexual perversion, constant lying, corruption, murder, ruining God-fearing peoples’ lives because they stand up for the truth. It’s not going to be pretty when He punishes this nation.
She’s right, BUT MANY BABIES WILL NOT SUFFER!!<P<Our country is OVER anyway.
No one suffers more than a baby being murdered in his mother's womb.
she’s correct but alot of folks don’t see that. Oh, well. If the R’s make abortion the #1 focus they will lose.
Outside of religious circles, most people and especially those evil wimmin are pro choice in certain circumstances.
This is how sick this woman is that follows Satan. She believes that we’ll suffer because we can’t kill babies and yet look at the state of our nation, the degradation that is oppressing us from everywhere. She’s Wicked. That’s how blinded she is by her false idol of abortion
She wiggle out of the net last time. South Carolina get the job done this time.
Total rino operative, classic winning is losing lies the pretenders spread!
They do everything the can to demoralize conservatives, this issue should be a rallying cry of unity and victory but instead this lying quisling tries to potion the win and use it to further promote murder and chaos.
Some Republicans are concerned with new proposed restrictions, such as the 6 week ban. Even Donald Trump made such remarks earlier this week, saying he thought a 6 week ban, as supported by Desantis was “a bit severe”.
For Trump to say this probably means research is showing that many younger conservatives want some flexibility in the abortion laws vs an almost total restriction.
Matt Walsh spoke against these timid antiabortion so-called Republicans the other day on his show. We’ve been working for decades trying to reverse the horrific Roe abortion decision, and when we finally got the decision reversed, we walk gingerly and are afraid to make any quick movements. It’s absolutely pathetic.
The new “Americans” love abortion more than freedom. Natural born baby killers.
As much as I dislike this woman….she is right. Trump has stated a compromise is what he wants. I think the idiot Republicans should have coalesced around ….”it’s been sent back to the states where it belongs.” Now let each state decide.
But we Republicans have to shoot off both feet and cause a backlash. We won Dobbs! Let the states make their decisions and work within your state.
I wish I’d never heard the word ‘abortion’. All I’ve ever seen that issue do in fifty years of observation is get good candidates for public offices defeated by vermin. Nobody ever thought anything could turn Virginia blue.
Winning is more important than life. That slippery slope has got us where we are.
Trump agrees with her. Winning is more important than babies being ground up like sausage.
If it’s trump who is pro abortion vs RFKjr.. well at least one isn’t a lockdown, big pharma, corporate crony guy.
Let’s say it’s 1858, and an anti-slavery Republican running for office in the South. He knows how vile slavery is. Should he accept slavery just to help his chances?
I’d say no. With some things there cannot be compromise.
Same goes with abortion.
But perhaps the candidate mentioned above can help to change things once he’s elected. So it’s not always so simple.
The Roe v Wade “law” was not law. It was an activist decision by the supreme court. Therefore, if it wasn’t law, what is Nancy talking about?
Removing an activist decision did not prohibit women from getting abortions. But, that abortion decision was not approved by the people or by any legislature. Therefore, it was the proper thing to do.
If judges can enact decisions which are treated as laws, what do we need the legislative side of government for? Besides, killing babies should not be codified in any form whatsoever. A law which permits killing of anybody, is the same as codifying murder. A similar decision could be made to ‘codify’ the killing of the elderly, and after 50 years or so of such a decision having been accepted, it would have a hard time being removed from ‘law’.
Nancy is okay on most things, but she is totally wrong on abortions.
Mace, the voters should’ve ABORTED YOU!
she is correct