Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem congresswoman silent on why she signed hush agreement with Chinese tech company
Fox News ^ | 4/20/23 | Thomas Catenacci

Posted on 04/20/2023 5:26:28 AM PDT by CFW

Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., ignored multiple requests for comment when asked why she signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to engage in closed-door discussions about a Chinese battery company's proposed factory.

Slotkin's office confirmed to The Detroit News earlier this year that the Michigan lawmaker and her deputy legislative director Austin Girelli signed NDAs to discuss the proposal from Gotion, a subsidiary of the Hefei, China-based Gotion High-Tech, to build an electric vehicle (EV) battery plant in Big Rapids, Michigan. The proposed factory would be located outside of Slotkin's congressional district.

Austin Cook, a spokesperson for Slotkin, explained to the outlet in February that Slotkin believed it was important "to learn more about significant economic development projects like this to better understand their impact, and if there are ways to help from the federal level." He acknowledged Slotkin and her staff signed NDAs to "be part of those conversations."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: congress; corruption; elissaslotkin; slotkin; treason
We need more information as to this NDA and Congressperson Slotkin. What was the purpose for it and what did she agree not to discuss?

We are being ruled (not governed) by a corrupt bunch of criminals.

1 posted on 04/20/2023 5:26:28 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Damn women politicians are just as big of crooks as men are. Trannies are as bad as both men and women.


2 posted on 04/20/2023 5:31:12 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (It's time to indict the Dung Beetle Party's token affirmative action chubby cheeked shyster lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

About two weeks ago NDAs were considered here as ordinary, everyday things.

The Chinese company may not wish to make its decision points known so it can drive better deals with land owners and local governments and to leave other battery makers unsure of the size of the market it will be taking for itself.


3 posted on 04/20/2023 5:33:23 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Congresswoman Slotkin is only one of 435 deciders.


4 posted on 04/20/2023 5:36:12 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The amount of the bribes and who gets them was discussed.


5 posted on 04/20/2023 5:36:24 AM PDT by dynachrome (“We cannot save Ukraine by dooming the US economy.” Rand Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“The Chinese company may not wish to make its decision points known so it can drive better deals with land owners and local governments and to leave other battery makers unsure of the size of the market it will be taking for itself.”

And a U.S. representative has exactly what reason in participating in those discussions and agreeing not to reveal the subject matter to her colleagues and constituents?


6 posted on 04/20/2023 5:37:07 AM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW
I'm with you on that. As a Representative I can't see how that should even be legal. A personal or business NDA that is separate from her duties as a Representative I understand, but not as a Representative.
7 posted on 04/20/2023 5:50:29 AM PDT by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFW; bitt; little jeremiah

Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., ignored multiple requests for comment when asked why she signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to engage in closed-door discussions about a Chinese battery company’s proposed factory.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Check her background, she may have been a Clown, iirc


8 posted on 04/20/2023 5:58:51 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Traitor


9 posted on 04/20/2023 6:00:01 AM PDT by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Snells like... treason.


10 posted on 04/20/2023 6:53:28 AM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Payoffs, ripoffs and things nobody saw


11 posted on 04/20/2023 6:56:35 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

She learned her word salad remarks from Harris.


12 posted on 04/20/2023 8:26:36 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

NDA’s are SOP... No company is going to discuss its internal plans or details of anything important with anyone external who hasn’t signed one.

I’d honestly be shocked if any company ever discussed potential plans for expansion, growth, or anything with a politician or anyone else without having them sign an NDA.

Otherwise, the person they are talking with are free to blab all their internal plans to the press, their competitors or anyone else without the company having any recourse.


13 posted on 04/20/2023 8:29:52 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

This is government-to-government. Big diff. Sunshine should prevail when congressclowns deal with the Chicoms.


14 posted on 04/20/2023 11:47:46 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

No it’s a private company and a government official, not government to government.

Could there be something nefarious going on? Sure.. but as I said, no company worth its salt is going to openly discuss its detailed plans with an outsider without an NDA in place.

I’ve had to sign NDA’s with nearly every company I’ve ever worked with in any capacity, some required them to just have an interview with them.

The underlying supposition that an NDA in and of itself is evidence of malfeasance is hogwash


15 posted on 04/20/2023 1:31:13 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

i think the problem with this one is the Chinese battery manufacturing is outside the critter district. plus why need fed help


16 posted on 04/20/2023 2:40:53 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson