[Oldeconomybuyer]

This figure, a detail taken from Figure SPM. 1 in the AR6 Synthesis Report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, shows the observed and possible future average global temperature changes. The changes in global surface temperature are shown relative to 1850-1900. Very low shows a scenario where warming is limited to around 1.5 degrees Celsius; low shows warming limited to around 2 degrees; intermediate shows warming limited to around 3 degrees; high shows warming around 4 degrees; very high shows warming above 4 degrees.

[pfflier]

This is so much crap. We've been loaded up with these types of predictions forever and they just keep moving the goalposts to make it fit.

Here's a blast from the past:

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/12/28/egg-on-their-faces-10-climate-alarmist-predictions-for-2020-that-went-horribly-wrong-n1289371

[alternatives?]

Just move a little further north. However, most people seem to be moving south. Hmmmm.

[RatRipper]

More boolsheet

[Aevery_Freeman]

It is officially Spring and where I live we have a two-feet deep snow pack.

I'm terrified of Global Warming. < /SARC>

[Migraine]

I’m stunned. In order to be scientific, don’t the measurements need to be based on the same instruments being placed in the same locations going back to 1850?

It’s obvious that this isn’t the case. Assumptions or interpolations about conditions worldwide in 1850 can only give spurious results.

Anyway, what is the average global surface temperature SUPPOSED to be? What would be ideal? What would satisfy the scaremongering industry?

[Scrambler Bob]

Hey, this is just evolution in action.

Evolution is science, don’t fight it.

That chart of progressive development of creatures looks like that germ to fish to frog to . . . to ape to human chart.

Can’t fight that science.

[Chode]

arrogant pukes thinking they’re smarter than people 50yrs from now and that technology is stagnant and won’t progress...

feh

[Tell It Right]

Our children will never experience a childhood as cool as ours. And our childhood wasn’t that cool.

Our childhood was cooler than the children experienced at the top of the Medieval Warm Period (~700 years ago), and children in the Roman Warm Period (~1,700 years ago), and the children of the Minoan Warm Period (~3,100 years ago).

[NorthMountain]

Our children will never experience a childhood as cool as ours.

That's ... debatable.

And our childhood wasn’t that cool.

Speak for yourself, puta!

[blackdog]

Comedy takes on many forms. Most are cloaked as news.

[FlyingEagle]

Looking forward to the Atlantic Ocean washing away beach houses of Obama, Brandon and Kerry.

[Candor7]

Funny, that graphic parallels the evolving size of my plenipotentiary appendage over the entire time period.

This proves that this is all so much crap.

The cult still believes in warping the geological scale of time and the evolution of climate driven primarily by changes in the sun.

SAY THE WORDS “SOLAR MINIMUM “ and watch them reach for their holy water, garlic, and oaken stakes........THEY ARE NUTZO....just look at the farmers revolt against them in Holland where they have banned cow farts. The farmers are winning.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64967513

[cuz1961]

AR6 Synthesis Report

/\

Ahh, the GIGO report !

[IYAS9YAS]

For people who love to tout Darwin over God, they sure do have an issue with the adapt-or-die way of things.

[Red Badger]

...how climate change will affect generations

[cp124]

I would like to thank the MSM for saving us from the ice age they predicted in the 70’s.

[Wuli]

“For a person born in 2020, the extent of warming highly depends on society’s response.”

That statement is a lie, and in true Left-of-center hypocrisy is even in denial of the so-called “science” of the alarmists. [1]

[1] That “science” use preumptions on how long CO2 remains in the atmosphere, and further posists that is a very, very long time. And how long is that? ASccording to their own “science” that time is so long that even with the most radical CO2 reductions possible right now, CO2 will continue to accumulate (increase as a total ppm of the atmosphere) for the next 100 to 200 years. That being the case it would be, under the very best scenarios, from 4 to 8 generations before the rate of atmospheric CO2 levels off - at highs way above today.

Meanwhile, while providing no material atmposheric change in CO2 for 4 to 8 generations, the “climate change” mandates will be economically destructive in two ways. First it will impose criplling added costs to every form of energy, and as the whole economy runs on energy, crippling new costs on everything. Meanwhile, the “investments” in “green energy” and their resulting additional costs will PREVENT economies from taking MORE NECCESSARY climate mitigation and adjustment meaures, which the alarmists own “science” would have to say MUST be done even if they are all that is done.

The “green” agenda is a Pol Pot approach to “climate change”, as if the ONLY way to “cure” to “climate change” is to economically destroy society, pushing energy use back to pre-industrial times, and doing so at staggering costs.

[nesnah]

The author of this tripe:

Kasha Govind Patel (born July 18, 1991) is an American science writer,[1] stand-up comedian,[2] voice artist, and podcaster.[3] She currently works as the deputy weather editor for the Washington Post.[4] She has produced the only regularly-recurring science comedy shows in the United States since 2014.[5] Before her time at the Washington Post, she was known as a digital storyteller for the NASA Earth Observatory.[6][7]

[Jim Noble]

The biggest consequence of climate change so far is that you no longer need the whitest skin possible and an IQ > 120 to survive among all that ice and the scarcity of game - so, IQs have been dropping for quite a while.

Either the ice comes back, or we’re all going to be killed by stupidity.

[no-to-illegals]

Fake News ….. Fake Science