Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Committed to WHO Pandemic Accord, Ambassador Says
The Epoch Times ^ | February 28, 2023 | Chase Smith

Posted on 03/01/2023 7:35:17 AM PST by Twotone

The lead negotiator representing the United States in discussions on a global pandemic accord said in a statement this week that the United States is committed to the accord amid debate on the draft document.

Leaders are meeting this week in Geneva as part of the fourth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Bureau (INB) to consider a “Zero Draft” (pdf) of the agreement.

The INB was set up by the World Health Assembly in December 2021 to “draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The first draft was released this month and is being debated during this week’s meeting and will be continuing in April. The INB will issue a report on the development of the accord at the WHA in May with a final report expected in 2024. On the agenda this week is to decide whether the draft will be the basis of negotiations for a pandemic accord and discuss the document in-depth. Ambassador’s Recommendations

The U.S. pandemic negotiator for the proposed accord, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, said this week that the United States is committed to forming the accord as part of a “major component of the global health architecture for generations to come.”

“Shared commitment, shared aspirations and shared responsibilities will vastly improve our system for preventing, preparing for, and responding to future pandemic emergencies,” she said. “We seek a Pandemic Accord that builds capacities; reduces pandemic threats posed by zoonotic diseases; enables rapid and more equitable responses; and establishes sustainable financing, governance, and accountability to ultimately break the cycle of panic and neglect.”

Hamamoto said the draft has a lot of work to build on and specifically said it is unbalanced toward response at the expense of prevention...

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: marxism; nationalsoverignty; pandemictreat; treason; un; unitednations; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2023 7:35:17 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/


2 posted on 03/01/2023 7:37:15 AM PST by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

FJB


3 posted on 03/01/2023 7:37:20 AM PST by lgjhn23 ("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/stop-the-who


4 posted on 03/01/2023 7:38:01 AM PST by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

This is patently illegal and unconstitutional. This amounts to a treaty. All treaties must be ratified by the US Senate.


5 posted on 03/01/2023 7:38:18 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Trump dumped WHO....follow the money.....


6 posted on 03/01/2023 7:40:14 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

It is treason.

Molo Labe


7 posted on 03/01/2023 7:40:15 AM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

A treaty made under the Constitution cannot violate the Constitution by delegating powers not already possessed from the Constitution or by delegating powers that cannot be delegated.

“Treaties” that try to do these are constitutions, governing conventions in their own right. Not treaties.

Treaties are not amendments.

**** the Lawless Scumbags of the Left.


8 posted on 03/01/2023 7:41:40 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

This is a clear attempt to undermine national sovereignty giving the globalist elites full control and must be resisted at every turn. Just as they used private corporations to enforce the vaxx mandates, they want to use the WHO to circumvent our constitutional rights.


9 posted on 03/01/2023 7:42:57 AM PST by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
tyrv9cW .. nz-RODS5-1
10 posted on 03/01/2023 7:45:42 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

But “ Executive Agreements” can be concluded and have virtually the same effect on compliance…forced on agencies, corporations, businesses…as we have seen with “ vaccine mandates”

The “ Paris Climate Accords”

The JCPOA with Iran

Who ratified those?

If fascism demands a boot stamp on human faces “ for the benefit of mankind”…then Orwellian order will ensue


11 posted on 03/01/2023 7:51:52 AM PST by silverleaf (“Freedom ultimately means the right of other people to do things that you disagree with”. T. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

James Roguski is terrific. I’ve been following his reporting on Substack.


12 posted on 03/01/2023 7:53:30 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Somehow Obama got away with a similar treaty through some stinking loophole that. He exploited if i recall right. Trump had to undo it when he took office.


13 posted on 03/01/2023 8:21:39 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx

[[This is a clear attempt to undermine national sovereignty giving the globalist elites full control]]

Thatnis exactly what it is, and therefore it is treason. Gop however will act like there is nothing they can do to stop it


14 posted on 03/01/2023 8:23:15 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Congress better challenge this as a TREATY & that would need their vote.


15 posted on 03/01/2023 8:27:02 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
This is patently illegal and unconstitutional. This amounts to a treaty. All treaties must be ratified by the US Senate. P>They think if they call it an "Accord" then it's not a treaty.
16 posted on 03/01/2023 8:28:25 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Twotone; 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...
twotone: The U.S. pandemic negotiator for the proposed accord, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, said this week that the United States is committed to forming the accord
as part of a “major component of the global health architecture for generations to come.” ..

"Hamamoto said the draft has a lot of work to build on
and specifically said it is unbalanced toward response at the expense of prevention..."

(My Comment) : Thus enrichening Big Pharma financially
rather than the prevention , or cure of the medical problem.
That is called a 'repeat business model', assuring future Pharma earnings on a world-wide stage.

17 posted on 03/01/2023 8:31:03 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

I think enriching Big Pharma is the least of our worries with the WHO & the pandemic treaty. They mean to control everyone thru these rule changes.


18 posted on 03/01/2023 8:57:26 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
Twotone : ".. the pandemic treaty. They mean to control everyone thru these rule changes. "

Exactly true !
They intend to ignore national sovereignty, Constitutional and human rights.
The pandemic treaty is a means for them to obtain more power and control.

19 posted on 03/01/2023 9:11:12 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

They better not....


20 posted on 03/01/2023 10:00:13 AM PST by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson