Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security, checks, and Rube Goldberg: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen suggests that 50 million seniors “could stop receiving benefits for a time.”
American Thinker ^ | 02/08/2023 | Brenton Smith

Posted on 02/08/2023 6:53:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The debt ceiling limit is back in the news. In the past, political leaders have responded to concerns about this issue by suggesting that Social Security checks might not go out on time should Congress not agree on another debt ceiling extension.

This begs the obvious question: Why a program with a $2.8 trillion reserve cannot pay benefits on time?

Pundits have weighed in on the subject, as have the fact checkers who largely agree that checks should not be at risk -- at least in theory. It is time for the Treasury Department to explain why Social Security checks might not be sent, and what steps have been taken to protect seniors who depend on the monthly checks.

In 2021, the last time this question surfaced, Treasury secretary Yellen wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal suggesting that 50 million seniors “could stop receiving benefits for a time.”  

 Clearly, “could” is a puzzling choice of words considering that Social Security serves as a lifeline for many of America’s senior citizens. Telling these Americans that “their monthly checks are in danger” conveys a cavalier attitude to the needs of the elderly.  

If there is any uncertainty about how Social Security would work in a situation where the government’s finances get tight, the question should move to the top of the priority list. “Could” implies that the question is not at the top list.

The history of the question makes me wonder whether it is on the list at all. It has lingered for more than a decade, dating back to 2011, when Barack Obama warned that “checks might not go out” in a CBS News interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debtlimit; seniors; socialsecurity; thevoteisautomated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
It is inexcusable, for a president to be unaware of the intricate details behind getting a Social Security check to every beneficiary. The president appoints someone to look after the details of how money moves from incoming taxes to the payment of checks, namely the Treasury secretary. Thus, it is that person’s job to know whether the checks heading to seniors will be sent or not.

After more than a decade living with this uncertainty, seniors deserve an immediate answer.

1 posted on 02/08/2023 6:53:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But the welfare checks and food stamps are sure to go out on time.


2 posted on 02/08/2023 6:56:27 AM PST by SamAdams76 (4,857,036 Truth | 87,716,542 Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Yellen hasn't considered the political ramifications of this.

The person in office who tries this (and probably Yellen too) will get tarred and feathered. And that's before the REAL trouble starts.

3 posted on 02/08/2023 6:56:46 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sure, they won’t stop welfare benefits, services for illegals, or the sending of billions and billions of $$$ to ukraine - but they will cut off SS checks first, and then blame republicans.


4 posted on 02/08/2023 6:56:47 AM PST by qwerty1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When the government has a shortage, they want the most vulnerable to suffer.


5 posted on 02/08/2023 6:57:52 AM PST by Spok (They lie, we know they lie, and they know that we know they are lying. And still they lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The money for the Illegal Immigrant population has to come from somewhere.


6 posted on 02/08/2023 6:58:30 AM PST by Quentin Quarantino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“We can guarantee cash payments from here on out, what we cannot guarantee is the purchasing power of that cash.” -Alan Greenspan during remarks on Social Security, Feb 16, 2005


7 posted on 02/08/2023 6:58:36 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But SS is not a ‘debt’, it’s backed by our money they took from us........................../s


8 posted on 02/08/2023 6:58:55 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Setting up the big “Blame the GOP”


9 posted on 02/08/2023 6:59:13 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Time for a bipartisan Social Security investigation as to the current financing and anticipated budgeting. As well as solutions that would be a win win for all involved.


10 posted on 02/08/2023 7:01:02 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Seniors are the last priority of this failed administration. But zalinskyy doesn’t have to worry his little head about where his next meal is coming from. Uncle Joe will send another 30 or so billion this quarter, and the next quarter, and so on.

Joe has given the people of this country a big middle finger, and I return it to him in like manner.


11 posted on 02/08/2023 7:01:34 AM PST by I want the USA back (News media are pond scum. My pronouns: Haha, heehee, hoho, hoo hoo. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What we were promised back in 1964! I just noticed a new disclaimer has been added to this web page.

“This is an archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or procedures.”

https://www.ssa.gov/history/ssa/usa1964-2.html

“Self-Supporting”

“The program is designed so that contributions plus interest on the investments of the social security trust funds will be sufficient to meet all of the costs of benefits and administration, now and into the indefinite future—without any subsidy from the general funds of the Government. Both the Congress and the Executive Branch, regardless of political party in power, have scrupulously provided in advance for full financing of all liberalizations in the program.”


12 posted on 02/08/2023 7:02:36 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (“No man’s life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

order of priority... military, social security, veterans services, everyone other than elected representatives and their staffs.


13 posted on 02/08/2023 7:03:10 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Social Security is a cash-flow system. There are no real funds in Al Gore’s lockbox in the sense of marketable assets. There are only Treasury IOUs.

In other words. SS operates out of general funds, regardless of the interagency accounting fiction of a reserve.

That’s what’s Ponzi about it. New (forced) entrants into the scheme pay older entrants. The money isn’t “held” or “invested.”


14 posted on 02/08/2023 7:03:39 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qwerty1234

Yes


15 posted on 02/08/2023 7:03:45 AM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Threatening the seniors is like local officials threatening education.

Do as I say or the old lady gets it!!


16 posted on 02/08/2023 7:04:04 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Correct!
At the county and city level, the first cuts threatened are to first responders. Fear tactics.


17 posted on 02/08/2023 7:04:11 AM PST by SheepWhisperer ("For the LORD gives wisdom; from His mouth come knowledge and understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

> Yellen hasn’t considered the political ramifications of this. <

I’ll bet she has. If the debt ceiling isn’t raised it will be because of the Republicans in the House. So the GOP will get all of the blame. Biden will go on TV and weep about those heartless Republicans. At least half the country will buy it.


18 posted on 02/08/2023 7:04:36 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
This was SNL at its finest....


19 posted on 02/08/2023 7:04:49 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: qwerty1234

Whenever there’s any talk of spending restraints the liberals immediately trot out their threats of draconian cuts to services. And they always blame Republicans.

Its all a game.


20 posted on 02/08/2023 7:06:57 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson