Posted on 01/19/2023 12:15:44 PM PST by Coronal
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday announced that it has been unable to identify the person who leaked an unpublished draft of an opinion indicating the court was poised to roll back abortion rights.
In an unsigned statement, the court said that all leads had been followed up and forensic analysis performed, but "the team has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence."
But the attached report suggested the court was not watertight, with some employees admitting they had talked to spouses about the draft opinion and how the justices had voted.
Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley, who is in charge of the investigation, said that 97 court employees were interviewed and all denied being the leaker. She said it was unlikely the court's information technology systems were compromised.
The report made no mention of whether the nine justices were questioned.
"No one confessed to publicly disclosing the document and none of the available forensic and other evidence provided a basis for identifying any individual as the source of the document," Curley wrote.
"If a court employee disclosed the draft opinion, that person brazenly violated a system that was built fundamentally on trust with limited safeguards to regulate and constrain access to very sensitive information," she added.
The court also consulted Michael Chertoff, who served as Homeland Security secretary during the administration of President George W. Bush. Chertoff wrote in a separate statement that he had recommended several measures the court could take to improve security, including restrictions on the circulation of hard copies of sensitive documents.
Chertoff said he had reviewed the investigation and concluded that it was conducted thoroughly.
"At this time, I cannot identify any additional useful investigative measures," he added.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
HA HA HA
Every branch of our government is CORRUPT!
Can not or will not?
Yup
Turley is right, a weak half hearted investigation which will only serve to encourage more leaks and thus less confidence in the institution.
So I suppose the destruction of our institutions and thus our country, is well on it’s way.
I am glad that it leaked because that stopped the 5 Justices who voted for it from reversing their positions.
If the leaker was one of the liberal members of the Supreme Court, that Justice must be impeached.
The Supreme Court said it has been unable to determine who leaked Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case last May.
After a probe that involved interviews with more than 100 employees, investigators are “unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence,” according to the court.
Perhaps the draft was leaked as a result of illegal electronic surveillance on the Court by the FBI or other federal agency.
This wasn’t a leak of pillow talk between spouses—it was a leak of the entire written opinion!
Bwahahahahahaha.
We “crazy conspiracy theorists” could see this coverup coming a mile away...
Unless they already recently retired.
LOL
“Can not or will not?”
Perhaps dare not.
It was the wise latina.
I am SOOOO surprised.
“illegal electronic surveillance”
That makes sense as an explanation of the leak and the coverup.
Those who are talking don’t know.
Those who know are not talking.
OR hadn’t been sworn in as the new Justice…..
“ Perhaps the draft was leaked as a result of illegal electronic surveillance on the Court by the FBI or other federal agency.”
Bingo. Or another government. Or the EU. Or Zelensky - and I’m not really kidding
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.