Posted on 12/01/2022 4:20:47 PM PST by wastedyears
I’m sure they have the records -— wonder IF any of those she “vaccinated” with saline died of covid, heart failure/attack, or “sudden death syndrome” in the last year or two. I’ll bet we never hear unless it looks like her patients fared significantly worse than those who actually got the real jab.
“That decision rests with the patient, and with the patient alone.”
Agreed.
Meanwhile in the US, I’m pondering getting a colonoscopy. My vaccination status probably follows me around like a puppy dog (or imprinted ducklings). I’ll be out for the procedure. It’s easy to imagine someone taking it upon themselves to vaccinate me while I’m out.
Another scenario. I report for the colonoscopy. While out, they test me for COVID, with a test that has a ridiculously high rate of false positive. They conclude I have COVID. Once in the facility, I can’t go until all protocols have been met.
I wonder how many people will get their flu vaccine only to be told afterwards that they are now protected from Covid.
Year ago, my wife had an operation. Afterwards, the doctor told us that he also took out her appendix while he was at it.
I asked a nurse if she would vaccinate an orange I held up to my arm if it would get me a vaccine card. She said no. So for 6 weeks I couldn’t frequent any bars.
Appears to me she was honoring the oath she swore to uphold:
Hip·po·crat·ic oath
noun
noun: Hippocratic oath; plural noun: Hippocratic oaths
an oath stating the obligations and proper conduct of doctors, formerly taken by those beginning medical practice. Parts of the oath are still used in most medical schools.
“Nevertheless, the patient must make the final call. Not a nurse. Not a doctor.”
BS. What you really mean is your doctor will provide you options from the pre-approved menu of expensive pharma options. You may not choose any option but those provided.
While i agree that she was wrong, she also likely saved lives because....well you know why, even if you wont admit it.
So i wonder if her patients are upset that they didnt get the vax?
AMEN!
A hero!
> The patient had no say. <
I wouldn’t be a bit surprised by that. “You want the jab, don’t you? Sure you do. Here’s the jab.”
Moderna and Pfizer pushed their risky and unproven mRNA jabs on the public. That was vile, and inexcusable. But I still stand by my previous comments. It’s not for some nurse or some pharmaceutical company to decide what’s best for the patient. That’s the patient’s right, and the patient’s right alone.
Sad how few people here agree with you.
If these people were forced under duress to get the jab, then she did good.
If they chose of their own free will, she shouldn’t have done this, and should face fines.
Its like taking my car to jiffy lube and asking for an oil change and they decide it doesn’t need one but needs the tranny done instead and doing that.
The nurse is today’s version of Corrie Ten Boom, or Oskar Schindler. She saved many lives!
Sadly, decision does not necessarily rest with the patient.
I have family members who had to take the clot shots or get fired...
I have family members who quit prior to being fired...health care workers...
The military, healthcare, and company mandates changed everything :(
Someone needs to use this as a case study on what the outcomes were as far as deaths from Wuhan and suddenly as compared to those that got the “vaccine.”
Probably won’t happen because it would blow up the narrative of “safe and effective.”
> What you really mean is your doctor will provide you options from the pre-approved menu of expensive pharma options. <
No, I do not mean that at all. I mean that a patient should be able to freely choose from all the available options.
However, I will agree with you in that sometimes a doctor will limit those options due to his own personal prejudices. That does not weaken my argument. Instead it’s an indictment of those doctors.
So,how many of those elderly died as opposed those who received the not vax?🤔🤨
Chances are, with what we are now finding out about these “experiments” there are likely many who are now relieved and very thankful to this nurse.
“However, I will agree with you in that sometimes a doctor will limit those options due to his own personal prejudices. That does not weaken my argument. Instead it’s an indictment of those doctors.”
They should face the same repercussions as the nurse. You could argue the nurse was informed and made the best call under the circumstances. You could argue the doctors were paid.
Nope. How old are you? Do you have parents IN a Nursing Home setting? Are YOU in a Nursing Home setting?
My Dad DIED in a Nursing Home Setting on May 31, 2020. The last day I was able to see him was on March 12, 2020. Luckily I was there for my every-other-day ‘visit’ (which was really to make sure he was being well cared for) and they were locking things down that day.
They gave him a CovidBS-19 shot. I checked his records. He never, in a MILLION YEARS would have consented, had he known what was going on. He had cancer and DEMENTIA. And if he HAD been in his right mind, he would’ve found this whole NIGHTMARE to be what it was - Mother Government Overreach beyond anyone’s worst nightmare. He could NOT make his own decisions. And they sure as h#ll didn’t ask MY permission, though I had Medical Power of Attorney and it WAS activated.
I made d@mn SURE that his DEATH CERTIFICATE read that he died of his CANCER and not CovidBS-19, which was the TRUTH.
So, unless you have a similar story and were on the Front Lines of this Unauthorized, Unwarranted Medical Experiment, as so MANY of us were, you don’t have a clue as to what the REST of us were up against.
This Nurse IS a Hero.
Dad? I’m carrying on your fear and loathing when it comes to Mother Government, and I am thwarting her locally wherever I can. I miss you! Every day. *HEART*
On another angle, providing these patients had no other covid injections, it may have confused the embalmed if they were to expire. The embalmed, believing they were embalming a valued corpse but finding no blood clot structures to be removed may have skewed statistics
.......lol, no disrespect intended but you sound like you would have been one of those that argued, back around 1765 to “not throw that tea in the water because it belongs to the King”...............and “don’t disobey the Stamp Act it’s the law”...................and “don’t shoot those pretty British Soldiers they are THE LAW.....and so on.
Bring it forward to our times and I guess you would echo John Roberts and 40 odd lower courts he reigned over looking the other way when 2020 elections were challenged based on the eternal cop out of lawyers called “standing”.
She prolly did ‘em a big favor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.