Posted on 11/28/2022 7:01:51 PM PST by RobaWho
Brunson v. Adams was filed out of Ogden Utah. The case has been accepted for review by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS.)
What is this case about? How does it concern me?
Following the 2020 election, certain legislators, Senators and others brought forward evidence and claims suggesting there was some sort of malfeasance during the 2020 election.
Once these claims and evidence were brought forward following the election, Congress was required to pause in order to investigate and ascertain the validity of these concerns. Among other things, this pause would have delayed the January 6th vote by Congress to certify the Electors and thus confirm the results of the election and next President of the United States.
Mike Pence and members of Congress voted NOT to pause nor did they implement an investigation surrounding these claims. Congress proceeded to confirm the Electors and their votes and name Joe Biden as newly elected President.
The case asserts that by failing to fulfill the requirement to investigate, all those who refused to investigate failed to fulfill their Oaths to protect the Country and Constitution. Failure to protect the Country is tantamount to committing treason. Consequently, these officials are open to investigation on such charges and if found guilty they could face the associated penalties.
The case asks that all those who failed to protect the Country be immediately removed from office and barred from holding future public office for the remainder of their lives. This would potentially include the President, Vice President and more than 380 members of Congress. Were this to be granted it could be followed by further investigation into their actions which could lead to criminal proceedings.
Why is this case now before the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court has thousands of cases brought to it for review each year. It is the Court’s decision which cases to take on and typically they review a relatively small number (several hundred per year of the thousands submitted.)
This case is before SCOTUS because they CHOSE to review this case.
Why would this case of all of those brought forward be one of those chosen for review? Most Constitutional professors and those familiar with the Supreme Court would suggest that the Court would be extremely unlikely to take this case on. It’s too controversial, too volatile, too outlandish. So the question remains “why did they agree to review this case?”
Who asked for Congress to pause and investigate?
During the first week of January 2021, prior to January 6th, amidst numerous instances of emerging evidence and concerns, U.S. Senators Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson, James Lankford, Steve Daines, Marsha Blackburn, and Mike Braun, along with Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis, Roger Marshall, Bill Hagerty and Tommy Tuberville, issued a statement calling for a 10-day pause in the Electoral process, and further asked Congress to appoint an Electoral Commission and to perform an emergency audit on the election results from the disputed States.
And I’d like a pink pony for Christmas.
We’ll Go Fund a pony for you, ferdamsure.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sigh... you are so right!!!
There sure are a great deal of eyores here.
I’d like a schrubbery
If that’s a scheming bush, i’m not sure that you want anything to do with it. A nice hedgerow would be nice however. We’ll GoFund that, too.
The relief requested is far too broad in scope. It’s crazy to think that every official who failed to believe the election was stolen will be subject to treason charges?
Another Lucy and the football ploy. 7 of the SCOTUS justices are either in on the big steal of 2020 or they fear for theirs and their family members lives to do their jobs. Tyranny works when the thugs suffer no consequences for their crimes.
“world-changing lawsuit that could remove over 380 elected US politicians, including Biden, Harris & former VP Pence, before the end of 2022?”
This will never happen.
Because IF it did, all the hood rats, ghetopotamuses, antifa, and every other liberal psychopath would go berserk making the riots of 2020 look like a weenie roast.
Probably because the Justices decided they weren't immune to radiation.
They have overturned both. For Executive Orders for example, in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the Supreme Court struck down Executive Order 10340, issued by President Harry Truman, which ordered Secretary of Commerce Charles Sawyer to seize control of a majority of the nation’s steel mills in anticipation of a steelworker strike during the Korean War. The court held that President Truman lacked the constitutional or statutory power to seize private property.
For elections, fraud vitiates everything. Any wronged individual, in this case Kari Lake and the citizens of Arizona, may have the court find for them.
This case is before SCOTUS because they CHOSE to review this case.>>> They chose so they could reject the legals. There is nothing to investigate. The states should have sent competing electors. Congress had no knowledge of any issues if the representatives did not bring up any issues. case close. Even Pense, who should have lobbied some of the states to send competing electors, could do nothing as there were no issues raised by congress. The have sole responsibility for the electors from the states they represent.
https://youtu.be/69iB-xy0u4A
A…. Shrubbery!!
Pink Pony with a Red Sash!
This case will come to nothing.
It’s not going to change anything.
It was stupid of whoever published this to put “fix” in the headline. Nothing’s going to fix things now, and when people read the headline they assume it means the opposite of what the writer intended.
That is a real possibility BUT if FOUR justices think otherwise, then maybe, just maybe we don't live in a Banana Republic after all. I've always thought that they have been given enough rope to hang themselves...
It is all “Hopium and chanting” at this point.
Communism has reached our most inner circles and here we are. The thinking people stand alone.
Courts, Congress, Senate and 3 pathetic generations of american worthless parents & their youths...
They waited until the “Greatest Generation” passed. Think for a second, this wasn’t planned?
1) Supreme Court Clerk CHOSE this case & Clerk assisted with filing
2) Lame Duck Congress planning to expand SC to 15 seats, pack court, reduce lifetime tenure of Justices - an open secret in DC
3) SC votes for plaintiff, it thrives as designed
4) SC denies plaintiff, it becomes irrelevant overnight
5) SC won’t be required to claim “Trump won”
6) SC only claims law was clearly ignored, violated
7) SC lives or dies with this decision in hand
8) Bitch & moan all you wish, these are the facts
1) Supreme Court Clerk CHOSE this case & Clerk assisted with filing
2) Lame Duck Congress planning to expand SC to 15 seats, pack court, reduce lifetime tenure of Justices - an open secret in DC
3) SC votes for plaintiff, it thrives as designed
4) SC denies plaintiff, it becomes irrelevant overnight
5) SC won’t be required to claim “Trump won”
6) SC only claims law was clearly ignored, violated
7) SC lives or dies with this decision in hand
8) Bitch & moan all you wish, these are the facts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.