Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could Brothers from Ogden, Utah, Have Found a Way To FIX The 2020 Election?
Creative Destruction Media (CDM.press) ^ | Rob Cunningham + Bill Quinn

Posted on 11/28/2022 7:01:51 PM PST by RobaWho

Brunson v. Adams was filed out of Ogden Utah. The case has been accepted for review by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS.)

What is this case about? How does it concern me?

Following the 2020 election, certain legislators, Senators and others brought forward evidence and claims suggesting there was some sort of malfeasance during the 2020 election.

Once these claims and evidence were brought forward following the election, Congress was required to pause in order to investigate and ascertain the validity of these concerns. Among other things, this pause would have delayed the January 6th vote by Congress to certify the Electors and thus confirm the results of the election and next President of the United States.

Mike Pence and members of Congress voted NOT to pause nor did they implement an investigation surrounding these claims. Congress proceeded to confirm the Electors and their votes and name Joe Biden as newly elected President.

The case asserts that by failing to fulfill the requirement to investigate, all those who refused to investigate failed to fulfill their Oaths to protect the Country and Constitution. Failure to protect the Country is tantamount to committing treason. Consequently, these officials are open to investigation on such charges and if found guilty they could face the associated penalties.

The case asks that all those who failed to protect the Country be immediately removed from office and barred from holding future public office for the remainder of their lives. This would potentially include the President, Vice President and more than 380 members of Congress. Were this to be granted it could be followed by further investigation into their actions which could lead to criminal proceedings.

Why is this case now before the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court has thousands of cases brought to it for review each year. It is the Court’s decision which cases to take on and typically they review a relatively small number (several hundred per year of the thousands submitted.)

This case is before SCOTUS because they CHOSE to review this case.

Why would this case of all of those brought forward be one of those chosen for review? Most Constitutional professors and those familiar with the Supreme Court would suggest that the Court would be extremely unlikely to take this case on. It’s too controversial, too volatile, too outlandish. So the question remains “why did they agree to review this case?”

Who asked for Congress to pause and investigate?

During the first week of January 2021, prior to January 6th, amidst numerous instances of emerging evidence and concerns, U.S. Senators Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson, James Lankford, Steve Daines, Marsha Blackburn, and Mike Braun, along with Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis, Roger Marshall, Bill Hagerty and Tommy Tuberville, issued a statement calling for a 10-day pause in the Electoral process, and further asked Congress to appoint an Electoral Commission and to perform an emergency audit on the election results from the disputed States.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2020; brunson; brunsonvadams; election2020; riggedelection; scotus; supremecourt; treason; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
Perhaps the single most powerful court case in US history awaits adjudication by our United States Supreme Court. Ask yourselves just one simple question: Why is the mainstream corporate media remaining DEAD SILENT about this potentially world-changing lawsuit that could remove over 380 elected US politicians, including Biden, Harris & former VP Pence, before the end of 2022? The media silence is quite deafening, wouldn’t you agree?
1 posted on 11/28/2022 7:01:51 PM PST by RobaWho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

We remember how the supremes failed to Take up other 2020 election suits, what makes you think they won’t vacate this case?


2 posted on 11/28/2022 7:06:20 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

Anytime the media is silent on subject, it means they are covering it up.


3 posted on 11/28/2022 7:06:31 PM PST by Parley Baer (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

It’s actually an interesting case, and despite the fact that we all know the Plaintff is correct, the odds are a million to 1 that SCOTUS will take the case. And it’s not like they can undo 2+ years of pedo Joe administration.


4 posted on 11/28/2022 7:12:28 PM PST by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

sounds like the case was submitted to SCOTUS asking them to take the case. They won’t take it.


5 posted on 11/28/2022 7:13:16 PM PST by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

If SCOTUS chose to take this on it is because they are going to squash the concept for good to make sure it can never be used in the future.


6 posted on 11/28/2022 7:13:52 PM PST by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho
All this assumes that we still have a constitutional republic, and that the supremes actually give a damn.

7 posted on 11/28/2022 7:13:59 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

LOL

Some people think the Courts have the authority and power to overturn the Congress and the Executive too.

Hilarious.


8 posted on 11/28/2022 7:15:38 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Anytime the media is silent on subject, it means they are covering it up.

But will the outcome be the same as it usually is?

9 posted on 11/28/2022 7:15:52 PM PST by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

Most likely. SCROTUS as it is now is not anything comservatives can trust to actually reign in election theft.


10 posted on 11/28/2022 7:16:15 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: princess leah; All
We remember how the supremes failed to Take up other 2020 election suits, what makes you think they won’t vacate this case?

SCOTUS didn't want to adjudicate the election itself. This case is not that. What it seeks is a remedy against those in Congress who refused to investigate the fraud. So, SCOTUS gets to stay above it all and declare "Shame on you Congress for not investigating" while it remains aloof. This may be the case they wanted to do that.
11 posted on 11/28/2022 7:16:22 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Initially posted on this last Tuesday.


12 posted on 11/28/2022 7:16:25 PM PST by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
We remember how the supremes failed to Take up other 2020 election suits, what makes you think they won’t vacate this case?

This is about Congress not doing their job properly, not about the election.

Somebody got too smart for their britches and their own failure is now biting them in the ass!

13 posted on 11/28/2022 7:16:56 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
But will the outcome be the same as it usually is?

Well, SCOTUS only needed on more justice to grant cert in the PA case when Amy Barrett was nominated, and she froze once she got on the court. Maybe she will find this case worth hearing.
14 posted on 11/28/2022 7:19:12 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

I have my doubts that the Court will grant Cert on this one.


15 posted on 11/28/2022 7:20:21 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

No, they will not. They tossed….like the first time out because it was without standing. They’ll do the same here! Let’s face it our nation is under judgment by God. It’s not gonna get any better it’s going to get worse.


16 posted on 11/28/2022 7:22:12 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

Who gave two Pence........?


17 posted on 11/28/2022 7:25:11 PM PST by Osage Orange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho
According to Docket Search, it appears that certiorari has been requested but not yet granted.
18 posted on 11/28/2022 7:25:19 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (“And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.” Acts 2:47 -- It's still true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho
The case asks that all those who failed to protect the Country be immediately removed from office and barred from holding future public office for the remainder of their lives.  This would potentially include the President, Vice President and more than 380 members of Congress.  Were this to be granted it could be followed by further investigation into their actions which could lead to criminal proceedings.

And I'd like a pink pony for Christmas.

19 posted on 11/28/2022 7:26:08 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobaWho

Our government except for a small subset of senators and reps is illegitimate.


20 posted on 11/28/2022 7:27:32 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson