1 posted on
11/07/2022 2:08:06 PM PST by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
Liberals view conservatives as a tax base and nothing else. They are democracy at its worst. They will not let eastern Oregon go and couldn’t care less.
2 posted on
11/07/2022 2:19:29 PM PST by
Dennis M.
To: lowbridge
What does Idaho say about this? Has anyone asked?
3 posted on
11/07/2022 2:23:36 PM PST by
Veto!
(FJB sucks rocks)
To: lowbridge
I wish Eastern Washington would vote to do this too (I live in Western WA).
There are 39 counties and one (Seattle’s King Co.) runs the state politically
4 posted on
11/07/2022 2:28:21 PM PST by
llevrok
(Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
To: lowbridge
A better argument can be made for splitting states up. One or two leftist hellholes usually control the entire state. Prime example: Chicago. Southern IL is very beautiful and conservative, but they get screwed because of Chicago. We can easily add another 20 states within the Continental US.
To: lowbridge
What happened to the State of Jefferson?
8 posted on
11/07/2022 2:46:37 PM PST by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
To: lowbridge
Yeah, sure!
Like that’s going to happen...
10 posted on
11/07/2022 2:56:11 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperatly need him)
To: lowbridge
The federal government controls much of the land in Idaho. As a consequence, that land is not productive to the state GDP or tax base. The feds try to compensate Idaho with something called Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILT) paid to the state government. I suspect much of eastern Oregon has a similar issue. Some is farm land. Some is under federal control. More unproductive land from a GDP/tax perspective, but a significant burden during fire season. I agree that the population likely mirrors Idaho political/cultural values. There might be enough people to contribute another House representative. From a land perspective, it would make Idaho straddle more Pacific timezone than it currently does. Most of the state is Mountain timezone.
11 posted on
11/07/2022 2:59:39 PM PST by
Myrddin
To: lowbridge
Article IV, Section 3:
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
12 posted on
11/07/2022 3:06:18 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("There should have been an age and risk stratification approach." still true)
To: Twotone; VeryFRank; Clinging Bitterly; Rio; aimhigh; Hieronymus; bray; 1malumprohibitum; ...
If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
13 posted on
11/07/2022 3:10:15 PM PST by
Twotone
(While one may vote oneself into socialism one has to shoot oneself out of it.)
To: lowbridge
Too bad our forefathers did not write Oregon’s Constitution.
Our forefathers ALMOST came to blows over giving each state 2 senators regardless of population.
States need to do SOMETHING similar. Perhaps instead of representation by population Oregon should give each county (out of 36) a vote in the House and each Senator one vote.
Then, King County would lose all it’s power and the state wouldn’t have to break up which I don’t think is a good idea, long term.
New York should do the same as should California. If people want to fight about it, fighting (and dying) over this proven concept would be better, in my opinion, than breaking up the state, which could also lead to fighting (and dying).
To: lowbridge
Eastern Washington should start a similar initiative. Make Idaho Great Again.
To: lowbridge
24 posted on
11/07/2022 4:43:11 PM PST by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson