Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

I’m reading there will be lots of lawsuits by fired employees. Not sure how this is legal. Can those with contracts sue if the company is sold to someone else?


3 posted on 11/04/2022 11:24:15 AM PDT by peggybac (My will is what I wanted. God's will is what I got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: peggybac

“I’m reading there will be lots of lawsuits by fired employees. Not sure how this is legal. Can those with contracts sue if the company is sold to someone else?”

As I understand it, the lawsuits are based on the notification time required for a layoff.

But I’ve been involved in layoffs (I did payroll so had to be involved) and don’t recall any lengthy notification process.

Though the laws may have been changed since.


5 posted on 11/04/2022 11:26:18 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac

They have no legal standing. The official seperation date is Feb 2, 2023. That satisfies the WARN Act.

If former employees do try to sue, they will likely lose out of any seperation package. The lawyers and politicians won’t care. They will use this for self-promotion.


10 posted on 11/04/2022 11:28:09 AM PDT by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac

California is an “At-will” employment State. Very few, if any, would be on an employment contract. The only thing they need to worry about is the WARN Act...and giving more than two month’s severance covers that. Most employee lawsuits will go nowhere.


11 posted on 11/04/2022 11:28:18 AM PDT by The Unknown Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac
I’m reading there will be lots of lawsuits by fired employees.

For what, though. He's paying them for a full three months while they are not working.

It's not like he hung them out to dry.

31 posted on 11/04/2022 12:01:45 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac

the lawsuits were all predicated on them being terminated today, and were based on some absurd law requiring 60 days notice. Since that’s not what is actually happening, they have no lawsuits to file.


38 posted on 11/04/2022 12:49:58 PM PDT by NicoDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac

What would their complaint be? They have time to look for another job while they’re still getting paid as employees, although deactivated, and they have more than 60 days notice if February is when they are no longer employed.


42 posted on 11/04/2022 2:23:29 PM PDT by skr (Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac

California is a right to work state. Yes it’s legal and the letter made it very clear it is notice and it is more than sixty days so yes it’s legal

It is a restructuring


49 posted on 11/04/2022 4:19:04 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: peggybac

It has to do with the federal law giving 60 days notice. MusK is giving them 90 day notices. The lawsuits won’t fly.


53 posted on 11/04/2022 4:24:09 PM PDT by EBH ( 1776-2021 Break the Yoke of Woke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson