Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Backs Republican in Pennsylvania Mail-In Ballots Case
epoch times ^
| 11 October A.D. 2022
| Jack Phillips
Posted on 10/11/2022 9:01:54 AM PDT by lightman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
The Supreme Court’s action on Tuesday means that the 3rd Circuit ruling cannot be used as a precedent in the three states covered by this regional federal appellate court—Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware—to allow the counting of ballots with minor flaws such as the voter failing to fill in the date.
1
posted on
10/11/2022 9:01:54 AM PDT
by
lightman
To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...
![](http://www.freerepublic.com/images/flags/us/pennsylC.gif)
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
2
posted on
10/11/2022 9:05:13 AM PDT
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: lightman
Ketanji Brown Jackson - she doesn’t know what a woman is, does she even know what a legal ballot is ?
3
posted on
10/11/2022 9:06:52 AM PDT
by
11th_VA
(XX < > XY)
To: lightman
“Watch the rot not care about your ruling”
4
posted on
10/11/2022 9:07:59 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The head, hands, and heart, serve even further than the purse. )
To: lightman
LAWS? What stinking laws?! Laws only apply to the Republicans never the Democrats! Just take a look at Colorado what’s going on with the 30,000 registration cards sent to illegals. How many of those illegals voted in 2020? The rats can break laws and get away with it but God forbid if the Republicans even think of breaking one! It’s the gulags for Republicans but promotions and tons of money along with book deals for the Democrats!
To: lightman
Rewording this to what I think they're saying...and read a bit about...This decision is a one time thing.
In other words, you've been warned....do it right or your vote will not count.
6
posted on
10/11/2022 9:11:21 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
( )
To: lightman
<>BJustices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, siding with David Ritter, an unsuccessful Republican candidate for a judgeship.
7
posted on
10/11/2022 9:11:30 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: lightman
But the whole issue that brought the case - the 2020 elections - is now “moot” - the cat is already out of the bag.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case as moot.
Yes, it can help in elections going forward but it also cannot be used to dispute a 2020 election - in Pennsylvania, New Jersey or Delaware - that’s moot now.
8
posted on
10/11/2022 9:11:37 AM PDT
by
Wuli
(ur)
To: Wuli
I’m reading that this ruling will NOT apply to the next election. Any case must stand on its own merits...if it gets to the courts.
9
posted on
10/11/2022 9:17:00 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
( )
To: lightman
If a group of conservatives made a concerted effort to steal an election suddenly election security would become a bipartisan issue.
Of course, I am just commenting, not suggesting. Any conservatives that employed democrat election tactics would be prosecuted, spend a couple of years in solitary confinement awaiting trial, and then be sentenced to 20 years in prison.
10
posted on
10/11/2022 9:19:29 AM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(Dementia Joe is Not My President)
To: 11th_VA
Which part of your anatomy is your a@@ and which is your elbow, Judge Brown?
I don’t know. I’m not a biologist.
11
posted on
10/11/2022 9:19:39 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
To: lightman
Sounds like SCOTUS is reminding lower courts of the plenary powers of Congress and the states’ election laws.
12
posted on
10/11/2022 9:20:59 AM PDT
by
RideForever
(Oh damn! Another dangling par ...)
To: lightman
In any game, the side that does not intend to follow rules always wins
13
posted on
10/11/2022 9:24:05 AM PDT
by
Lee25
( )
To: lightman
So, mail-in ballot’s outer envelope requires a signature. Is there signature verification?
14
posted on
10/11/2022 9:25:28 AM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
( Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
To: ConservativeInPA
“ So, mail-in ballot’s outer envelope requires a signature. Is there signature verification”
Silly rabbit, signatures are racist because black people can’t write
15
posted on
10/11/2022 9:29:32 AM PDT
by
dsrtsage
( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
To: RideForever
It took a couple of reads, but that’s how I understand it.
16
posted on
10/11/2022 9:29:50 AM PDT
by
Semper Vigilantis
(I refuse to grow up and you can't make me!)
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
17
posted on
10/11/2022 9:35:51 AM PDT
by
bitt
(<IMG SRC=' 'width=50%>)
To: 11th_VA
To: dsrtsage
Like that guy Malcolm that never learned to spell his last name, so he just wrote ‘X’.
19
posted on
10/11/2022 9:39:25 AM PDT
by
ConservativeInPA
( Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
To: lightman
Many will claim the postmark on a ballot is sufficient.
But many ballots go straight into “drop boxes” and never see the postal system, hence, they never get a postmark.
20
posted on
10/11/2022 9:40:58 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(We are being manipulated by forces that most do not see)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson