Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CODE RED China ‘convinced it needs to hit US with Pearl Harbor-style surprise attack’ to win war over Taiwan, expert warns
The Sun ^ | August 5, 2022 | Tariq Tahir

Posted on 08/05/2022 12:17:01 PM PDT by Perseverando

CHINA is convinced it now needs to hit America "hard and early " in a surprise Pearl Harbor-style attack to invade Taiwan, a leading expert has warned.

Oriana Skylar Mastro, a fellow at Stanford University and a former China analyst at the Pentagon, told The Sun Online how Beijing increasingly views an invasion of the island as inseparable from a war with the US.

It comes as massive Chinese military exercises are currently taking place off Taiwan following the visit by US politician Nancy Pelosi.

She is the third in line to the presidency and the most senior US figure to visit the self-governing island in decades.

Mastro told The Sun Online these types of blockade war games are set to become more commonplace as the threat of war increasingly looms.

She explained that Beijing now believes it also has to fight the US if it is to fulfil its long cherished goal of invading Taiwan and "reuniting" with the mainland.

Mastro believes the most likely way such a conflict would play out is with a Pearl Harbor-style attack on US forces in the region.

It would be designed to try and knock out US forces so they could not react to stop China gaining a foothold in Taiwan, which it regards as its territory.

The strategic gamble would be an attempt to stall a wider war - just as Japan hoped when they attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, drawing the US into World War Two.

It would be one of the chilling factors China would have to weigh up if decides the only way to "reunification" with Taiwan is an invasion.

(Excerpt) Read more at the-sun.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccp; china; pearlharbor; taiwan; ww3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: MercyFlush

Easier just to gradually control the big Taiwanese companies.


21 posted on 08/05/2022 12:30:44 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rural_Michigan

With over90% of pharmaceuticals coming out of China we would be in serious trouble right quick.


22 posted on 08/05/2022 12:30:46 PM PDT by mware (RETIRED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jpp113
they’ll take out our carriers first, then the rest of the fleet.

The Japanese didn't have to worry about ICBMs.
23 posted on 08/05/2022 12:31:05 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

I bet Barry the Muslim is on the phone right now with Biden begging to be there when he waves the white flag and surrenders the USA to his Bosses in China.


24 posted on 08/05/2022 12:31:16 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

The 1942-1945 US Navy and today’s navy are not the same.


25 posted on 08/05/2022 12:31:34 PM PDT by Jim Noble (I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jpp113

They take out our carriers, we nuke China. So this article is BS. Their only play is to go after Taiwan. But I don’t think China can do it. Taiwan is able to defend itself with planes, missiles and drones. It is literally impossible to do an amphibious landing on Taiwan.


26 posted on 08/05/2022 12:32:35 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando; All

The author and the “expert” are full of sh!t.

China KNOWS they are totally outclassed and cannot prevail.

They will not attack US forces directly for at least a couple of decades, if ever.


27 posted on 08/05/2022 12:33:27 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
we don’t need a single soldier on that side of the world to retaliate if attacked.

This article is BS.

Yes, that's all well and true, but we have quite a few soldiers, sailors and Marines on "that side of the world" at the moment. The question is, how many there would still be alive after a "Pearl Harbor" type of attack.

I also found this discussion from August 2, 2022 regarding the CCP, Russia and even North Korea very informative.

Skip the first 8 minutes to cut to the meat, if curious.

BREAKING: China Mobilizing for Taiwan Invasion (Jeff Nyquist Interview)

28 posted on 08/05/2022 12:33:39 PM PDT by Perseverando (Antifa, BLM, RINOs, Islamonazis, Marxists, Commucrats, DemoKKKrats: It's a Godlessness disorder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The 1942-1945 US Navy and today’s navy are not the same.

Amen. That Navy was just bringing on this brand new technology called "radar" then. They could basically SEE the blips, but they weren't quite sure what they were. I believe they mistook them for some of our own Army aircraft.
29 posted on 08/05/2022 12:34:06 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
They take out our carriers, we nuke China. So this article is BS. Their only play is to go after Taiwan.

Yes. To me, their best play right now is to just go into Taiwan and count on us to do nothing to defend it (maybe we send money, and arms ala Ukraine). I honestly don't think they're dumb enough to hit us Pearl-style.
30 posted on 08/05/2022 12:36:17 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

As long as they do not attack Washington DC. We would be helpless. Please, please hope they do not attack DC. </sarcasm font off>


31 posted on 08/05/2022 12:37:33 PM PDT by krizzy (Never underestimate Joes ability to F things up. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

$1000 says that silly Doomsday Clock won’t budge...


32 posted on 08/05/2022 12:37:49 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970
The Japanese didn't have to worry about ICBMs

Neither does China if they attack military targets in the open ocean.

33 posted on 08/05/2022 12:38:18 PM PDT by Jim Noble (I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

expert warns

experts claim

according to experts

bla bla bla


34 posted on 08/05/2022 12:39:10 PM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krizzy

35 posted on 08/05/2022 12:40:27 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MercyFlush

“China is not going to start World War 3 over Taiwan.”

Yeah, it’s not likely.

More likely, they’ll try to Hong Kong them. China will encourage the Democrats to pull back from support of Taiwan, and will enter into a Hong Kong style agreement granting autonomy, etc. Then it will squeeze Taiwan and take it over.


36 posted on 08/05/2022 12:40:46 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“The 1942-1945 US Navy and today’s navy are not the same.”

So?

And the 1942-1945 US Army Air Force and today’s USAF are not the same.

We have far more power today, so we need fewer platforms to deliver knockout blows.


37 posted on 08/05/2022 12:44:17 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

NASA is too busy with “Muslim ‘outreach’”


38 posted on 08/05/2022 12:44:21 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ( Liberty Valance Time. The point of a gun is the only law the left understands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

MREV


39 posted on 08/05/2022 12:44:26 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Hi Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Neither does China if they attack military targets in the open ocean.

If China hits us with a "Pearl Harbor-style surprise attack", say, by sinking a carrier or three, they most certainly have to worry about ICBMs. Or at the very least, quite a few sub-launched.

Could they do a bit of proxy fighting, maybe an "accidental" incident? Perhaps. Might they splash a few rounds around our assets? They might. But they're not going to launch a surprise attack to the scale of Pearl.

If they do, they may as well launch their nukes first.
40 posted on 08/05/2022 12:44:42 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson