Posted on 07/23/2022 12:56:57 PM PDT by dennisw
So, then why are you afraid to name these “world leaders” who supposedly said this, limey?
You can stop spreading the Putinist garbage now.
Russians have the “mongoloid” MINDSET is what Patton meant.
And Russia is about as “Christian” as China is. Some estimates place self-identified Atheists at 50%. Not to mention the rampant alcoholism, prostitution, infidelity, and abortion that are sky-high. Far higher than America. Just because Putin uses it to drum up support makes it about as true as when Hitler did it.
But yes, you do have a point that some libtards are trying to destroy Chrisitanity.
Can there just be ONE reply that talks about who, what, where, when and how about the story, rather than:
a: Globohomo Biden WEF Soros Schwab...
or
b. Putin Puffer RuZZians subhuman commies
???
You ALL are killing Free Republic and are seriously violating the rules.
One of y’all wants to cook another and feed them to cannibals!
Let’s just knock it off!!!
>>>>in a location given as Odesa, Ukraine in this picture obtained from social media
>>Now that’s some solid evidence right there
As I’ve been saying from the very beginning of this,
The Ukrainian media and leadership are lying.
The Russian media and leadership are lying.
The US media and leadership are damn sure lying.
The EU media and leadership are lying.
The Brit media and leadership are lying.
In war, the first casualty is the truth.
What I know is I see no compelling US interests in Ukraine. Other than dirty dealing, money laundering by our leadership, and enrichment for the MIC.
Not an expert on this war. But just maybe those ports are being used to bring in weapons for Ukraine. And some very nasty ones at that.
I agree, it’s pretty bad!
You need to catch up with the rest of the world...and look at our collection of political prisoners from January 6. Biden and the WEF are what endanger us, not Putin.
Quite easy to build lists off the press reports.
UN Secretary General António Guterres, High Representative of the European Union for foreign policy, Josep Borel, Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kalas, U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Bridget Brink, UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, Director-General and CEO of The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) Dr John Chipman, have outright condemned it.
Turkish Defence Minister Hulusi Akar expressed “concern” about the attack but is careful to avoid naming Russia as the instigator - “The Russians told us that they had absolutely nothing to do with this attack and they were looking into the issue very closely... We will continue to fulfil our responsibilities under the agreement we reached yesterday.”
Russia, hilariously, first told Turkey that there was no attack at all on Odessa, then a few hours later rebuked the UN Secretary General for condemning the attack that did happen “without verification” that Russia did it... And now claims that yes it did attack (Western armaments and Ukrainian military kit).
The verification thus far is that there were four Kalibr cruise missiles fired at Odessa; two were intercepted and the other two hit.
There’s also footage of the attack.
https://twitter.com/ricchamps9/status/1550965820829966337
That sure looks like an area full of shipping containers, not military craft, to me. And you can see grain stores to the right of where the explosion hit.
It really is lamentably poor bullshit but follows the exact same pattern as several other Russian strikes.
Deny anything happened at all, then say the other side might’ve done it, then admit they did it but only because there were legitimate military targets.
Every time Russia follows this pattern, it has three narratives - one is true, the other two are bullshit.
If it had conclusive proof it was hitting a military target in ANY of these circumstances, it wouldn’t need to bullshit 2/3 of the time. It’d just provide the proof up front.
It’s not difficult. Ukraine does that a lot... when it says it hit a military target it provides video of the strike so you can see exactly what it was they were firing at and that then puts the burden of proof on Russia to show that what looked like a military target, wasn’t.
Thanks, AB. And allow me to propose a question to both sides:
How’s that defense our southern border going?
Not one of those people you mentioned, is a world leader. Only one even comes close to that, though he is not an elected leader. At least, not elected by the people.
Putin might have found out there are Nazis at those ports along with secret corruption information on Paul Pelosi.
He’s saving us all………….
“Deny anything happened at all, then say the other side might’ve done it, then admit they did it but only because there were legitimate military targets.”
And the Putinistas here will believe all three of these claims.
“..Russia refuses to acknowledge that it is a party to the Minsk agreements, ..”
I think that was because heads of state did not sign the document, but rather their representatives. That gives denial power. The following is a detailed explanation of what all occurred.
https://epicenter.wcfia.harvard.edu/blog/through-ashes-minsk-agreements
Somebody double crossed the Russians
Bad. Move.
Good point.
I was schooled by Irish oriented Anglos Irish. She always said "enunciate" and she was right to us mumbling 12 year olds. right. Marms in NYC.
Correct. This is ye old USSR communism lies threats deception done all over again for 2022. Vlad loves St and loves the way Stalin operated
The old is new again with Vlad’s hypersonic nuke threats.
Just might be!
+++++ And as always remain in light
You too get a remain in light rating for this coming week in advance. You have labored in the FO vineyards so why not?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.