Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/18/2022 1:48:26 PM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: DFG

Why wouldn’t she trade on insider info? It’s not like the RINOpublicans under Bitch McConnell will do anything about it. Matter of fact, they don’t do much of anything do they, they just allow the DemoMarxists to do whatever the hell they want


2 posted on 07/18/2022 1:50:36 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

lol.


3 posted on 07/18/2022 1:50:58 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

California is a community property state. If her husband owns stocks, the she owns the same stocks.


4 posted on 07/18/2022 1:51:00 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (I got the <ΙΧΘΥΣ>< variant. Catch it. John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

That stinks on ice. We know better.


5 posted on 07/18/2022 1:51:29 PM PDT by W. (Hey, who farted?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

They all do it. Republicans too. They don’t even try to hide it anymore. They are our betters you know. To them, we are just sheep.


6 posted on 07/18/2022 1:51:54 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

anyone in her household should be prohibited from trading on securities in which she votes and can influence their financials.


7 posted on 07/18/2022 1:52:54 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG
What is the family attribution rule?

Family attribution rules. An individual is treated as owning any interest that's owned. by the individual's spouse, children, grandchildren or parents. • A spouse's interest is attributed to the other spouse.

8 posted on 07/18/2022 1:53:24 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

he exercised call options. I havent seen disclosed what he paid for them. The stock is at 160. Exercise price was 150

He could have just sold the call options. Maybe he wanted the stock so he could write calls or puts on it.

He could have just rolled over the calls if he was expecting a big price jump


9 posted on 07/18/2022 1:54:18 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG
In any legitimate private sector setting, where there is the potential for trading on MNPI (material non-public information), businesses set up controls to void this potential.

Frequently, in the financial services industry, employees AND their spouses and family members have to get pre-clearance before trading; if a stock is on a RESTRICTED list, that trade won't be cleared.

In extreme circumstances, for high-ranking personnel (e.g. The head of trading at an investment firm), that employee's personal stock holdings must be moved to ONE brokerage account that is also monitored for improper trades.

Forgetting about all this administration, the fact is that anyone with ethics would NEVER trade on MNPI.

This happened because a) government isn't serious about trading on MNPI, and b) the Pelosi's have no ethics.

15 posted on 07/18/2022 1:58:49 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity’s waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

And of course nothing will happen since her commie drunk husband is a Democrat so its fine..the same ones who say “Well Nancy had no idea what her husband does” are the same ones who say that Justice Thomas needs to be impeached due to what Ginni Thomas believes


16 posted on 07/18/2022 1:59:42 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

Total 100% BS, the definition of insider trading.


17 posted on 07/18/2022 2:00:20 PM PDT by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

What’s Trading on Capitol Hill?

https://www.capitoltrades.com/


18 posted on 07/18/2022 2:01:35 PM PDT by COUNTrecount ("I've always won, and I'm going to continue to win. And that's the way it is." -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

Nothing my husband did was wrong so shut up go away or else.


19 posted on 07/18/2022 2:01:53 PM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

They don’t even care what anyone thinks. OTOH, perhaps for that kind of change, I wouldn’t care either. What fools they are making of America. Criminals.


21 posted on 07/18/2022 2:02:49 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (Maranatha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Nanci Pelosi made a non-responsive response. The concern is whether Pelosi told her husband any non publicly available details of any upcoming semiconductor related legislation that she is privy to. In particular, any details that might favor Nvidia. Nancy Pelosi’s response (at least so far as it was reported) did not answer that concern. This leaves wide open the possibility that she did violate insider trading rules in a most egregious manner by consciously evading the sense of the question and the (self evident and obvious) public concern. It is imho a legalistic and evasive response, not the response of an honest public servant. The verbiage about future bills regarding conflicts of interest is just verbiage since it only addresses potential future bills which may never see the light of day but provide an opportunity to politicians such as Pelosi to deflect and virtue-signal with no commitment and no assumption of responsibility or guilt.


22 posted on 07/18/2022 2:03:02 PM PDT by SteveH (.all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

Has the press ever ask Martha Stewart what she think about pelosi.. and her buddies in government.. getting away with this?


24 posted on 07/18/2022 2:04:15 PM PDT by Leep (Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG
ANNOUNCEMENT FROM US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C., July 18, 2022 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Jaime Lizárraga has been sworn into office as a Commissioner by Chair Gary Gensler. Commissioner Lizárraga was nominated by President Biden earlier this year and confirmed by the U.S. Senate on June 16.

"I’m honored to welcome Jaime to the SEC as a Commissioner," said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. "Jaime is an incredible public servant with decades of experience in economic and financial policymaking. He has a deep understanding of the intersection of policy and the public interest. I look forward to working with him on behalf of the American public."

"At its core, the SEC's mission is about providing working families with the confidence to invest in safe, strong, and transparent markets. I am committed to working with Chair Gensler and my fellow Commissioners to strengthen that mission for the protection of investors and particularly working families," said Commissioner Lizárraga.

Commissioner Lizárraga most recently served as Senior Advisor to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In that role, Commissioner Lizárraga oversaw issues related to financial markets, small business, international finance, and immigration. He also served as Speaker Pelosi’s liaison to, and worked closely with, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

25 posted on 07/18/2022 2:04:25 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG
The Speaker has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,"

yeah, right...

26 posted on 07/18/2022 2:06:27 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG

He’s trying to avoid the subject. She’s the insider information she knows what companies these are gonna go to the subsidies and her husband well he’s the trader who’s buying stocks will financially benefit the both of them because they’re married


29 posted on 07/18/2022 2:12:19 PM PDT by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DFG
California is a community property state, which is a policy that only applies to spouses and domestic partners. This means that all property a couple receives during marriage becomes joint property.
30 posted on 07/18/2022 2:12:48 PM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson